Atkinson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Atkinson

Description:

'Memory is a byproduct of perceptual analysis' ... Semantic processing is (usually) better than non-semantic (sensory-physical) processing ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: dha38
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Atkinson


1
Atkinson Shiffrin theory
Control processes
Sensory Store
STM
LTM
Forget?
forget
forget
2
Atkinson Shiffrin theory
  • Limited capacity of STM
  • Limited duration of STM
  • Acoustic storage
  • Research generated focus was on quantitative
    factors (how many items can fit into STM how
    fast do items fade from STM, etc.)

3
Levels of Processing Theory
  • Demo experiment
  • Memory is a byproduct of perceptual analysis
  • Intent to remember is not necessary how info
    processed is what matters
  • Semantic processing is (usually) better than
    non-semantic (sensory-physical) processing

4
Is nonsemantic ever better?
  • Bransford if nature of info to be remembered is
    nonsemantic, then nonsemantic encoding can be
    better if retrieval cues given, then cues in
    same mode as encoding can be better

5
How does LOP differ from AS?
  • Qualitative nature of encoding is what matters
    most (more than quantitative, such as how long
    you study)
  • No separation between short- and long-term
    memory memory fades as a function of the level
    to which info was process shallow processing
    fades quickly deep processing fades slowly

6
Levels of Processing and Elaboration
  • Making associations interconnecting target info
    with other concepts
  • Craik Tulving study with sentence frames
    varying in complexity (elaboration)
  • Self-reference effect relating info to self
    elaborates it by integrating it with self-schema

7
Precise elaboration
  • Bransford Stein not just any elaboration
    helps elaboration must make info less arbitrary
  • Arbitrary isolated facts without understanding
    of why how
  • Precise elaboration cognitive processes that
    aid discovery of such integrating explanatory
    ideas

8
Precise Elaboration
  • Implications of precise elaboration we should
    require ourselves to generate seek answers to
    how and why questions when learning
    information
  • We should look for connections, analogies to
    understand info more deeply
  • Deep understanding is main way we can remember
    what we learn over long time periods

9
Encoding Specificity
  • Degree of similarity between encoding and
    retrieval conditions
  • More similar, better memory
  • Examples recognizing people depends on knowing
    context you know them from

10
Encoding Specificity
  • Similarity of physical context can
    matterBaddeleys on-land vs. underwater memory
    studies
  • Similarity of mental context probably matters
    more. Perceived similarity of context more
    important than actual similarity of context.

11
Emotions Mood Pollyanna Principle
  • Tend to remember more pleasant than unpleasant
    memories (word lists autobiographical studies)
    unpleasant memories fade faster
  • Info associated with violence less-well
    remembered than if associated with neutral
  • Faster recall of pleasant stimuli (order of
    recall)

12
Mood Congruence
  • Is info similar or different to mood you are in
    when trying to recall?
  • Memory better when similar
  • May be why it is hard to get out of bad mood
    tendency to recall negative memories when in bad
    mood

13
Mood-dependent Memory
  • Compares mood at encoding with mood at retrieval
  • Same yields better memory
  • Not a robust effect, however

14
Explicit vs. Implicit Memory
  • Explicit conscious attempt to encode retrieve
    info recall recognition typical
  • Implicit retrieval is a byproduct of a
    cognitive task, without subjects awareness that
    they are retrieving previously-presented info
    priming tasks common

15
Explicit Implicit Memory
  • Dissociation when variable has large effect on
    one task but not on another
  • LOP effects large on explicit, but often small or
    null on implicit tasks
  • Amnesia weak on explicit often do more
    normally on implicit
  • Is memory for having eaten explicit or implicit?
    (experiment has been done)

16
Expertise
  • Experts have better memory in their own area of
    expertise, but only there
  • Why?
  • Knowledge structure (helps comprehension, deep
    processing), vivid mental imagery, organizing
    strategically rehearsing info, good at
    reconstructive memory

17
Examples of expertise effects
  • Professional actors much rehearsal, but also
    focus on why these specific words used to portray
    thoughts motives of character
  • Own race bias we are better at identifying
    members of our own race than others
  • Demo memory for a common object

18
Autobiographical memory
  • flashbulb memoryrecall for surprising,
    emotional event
  • Recent research just as inaccurate as ordinary
    memories, but tend to be highly confident that
    memory is accurate for flashbulb memories (note
    especially the Talarico Rubin study)

19
Autobiographical memory
  • Consistency bias we reconstruct past from
    present perspective tendency is to remember our
    previous opinions, etc. as more similar to
    current ones than the actually were
  • Source monitoring what is source of info that
    is in memory?

20
Autobiographical memory
  • Source monitoring actual experience or
    imagination or dream or movie or some other
    source?
  • Thinking about imagining an event can make us
    think we actually experienced it

21
Constructive Reconstructive memory
  • Constructive memory demos (Jenkins study word
    list study)
  • What goes into memory storage is result of input
    interacting with various cognitive processes
    (inferences, integration, etc.)
  • Reconstructive memory example of eyewitness
    testimony

22
Eyewitness testimony
  • Juries tend to believe eyewitnesses
  • Experimental evidence suggests that eyewitness
    testimony can be unreliable
  • Misinformation effect Loftus studies (e.g.,
    bumped vs. smashed into car)
  • Represents an example of source monitoring error
    in reconstructive memory

23
Eyewitness testimony
  • Recovered memory/false memory false memories
    can be created in lab retractions of testimony
    have occurred after parents jailed from
    recovered memories
  • Role of questionable techniques in
    eliciting/creating memories (hypnosis,
    encouragement, repeated attempts to retrieve,
    imagining)

24
Evidence for Recovered Memories
  • Some cases of documented childhood sexual abuse
    person later shows no memory for abuse
  • Theory betrayal trauma (Freyd)to be able to
    maintain relationship with caretaker can require
    forgetting abuse

25
What to conclude?
  • Both false memories and recovered memories can
    occur dont know relative frequencies
  • Without independent evidence actual occurrence of
    events causing trauma, caution appropriate when
    evaluating recovered memories
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com