Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity In Kidney Allograft Protocol Biopsies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity In Kidney Allograft Protocol Biopsies

Description:

... (diagnosis rendered ... Diagnosis *C4d ve in 1 of 189 biopsies (NP, AR IB) Protocol Biopsies. Total ... A diagnosis of CNIT requires aggressive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:170
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Neer4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity In Kidney Allograft Protocol Biopsies


1
Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity In Kidney
Allograft Protocol Biopsies
  • Neeraja Kambham M.D.
  • Stanford University

2
Calcineurin Inhibitor Toxicity (CNIT)
  • CNI toxicity is a very important cause of chronic
    allograft nephropathy (CAN)
  • Later phase of CAN (i.e. gt 1 year post txp) is
    likely due to CNIT, and its contribution
    progressively increases (Nankivell et al.)
  • Acute phase of CNI toxicity is reversible, but
    chronic phase is probably irreversible

3
CNI Toxicity
  • Functional
  • Structural
  • Acute tubulopathy (proximal tubules),
    endothelial injury (thrombotic microangiopathy)
  • Chronic arteriolopathy, tubular atrophy, striped
    fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis

4
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Toxicity
  • Can it it be scored objectively?
  • Is it clinically useful?
  • Does it correlate with subsequent graft function?
  • Is it better than Banff Chronicity score?

5
Study Design
  • 50 consecutive pediatric renal transplant
    patients (November 1999- December 2004)
  • Patients on Steroid free immunosuppression
    protocol
  • Immunosuppression Extended Daclizumab induction
    Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate mofetil maintenance
  • Biopsies Protocol 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (P)
    also as indicated clinically (NP)

(Sarwal MM et al Transplantation. 76 (9) 2003)
6
(Sarwal MM et al Transplantation. 76 (9) 2003)
7
Study Design
  • 231 biopsies (PNP) scored in a blinded fashion
  • 27 were inadequate (diagnosis rendered on 5)
  • CNI toxicity (CNIT) score in biopsies with
    histological evidence of CNI toxicity
  • Banff chronicity score (BChS) cg, ct, ci, cv
  • Modified Banff chronicity score (MBChS) gs, ct,
    ci, cv
  • Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI)
  • C4d Stains on paraffin embedded tissue

8
Diagnostic Categories
  • CNI Toxicity
  • Acute Rejection
  • graded by Banff criteria
  • Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
  • Unclear etiology of chronic damage
  • Any tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis gt 5
  • No Significant Abnormality
  • No tubular atrophy interstitial fibrosis lt 5
  • Other ATN, glomerulonephritis, reflux

9
Acute Rejection (n29)
  • Non-protocol Biopsies 21 (9 )
  • Borderline 13
  • IA 6
  • IB 2
  • Protocol Biopsies 8 (4.8 )
  • Borderline 4
  • IA 3
  • IB 1

Includes clinical subclinical acute rejections
10
Features of CNI Toxicity
  • Tubular isometric vacuolization
  • Arteriolar medial/peripheral hyaline
  • Striped pattern of tubular atrophy and
    interstitial fibrosis

Ischemic collapse of glomeruli, Tubular
dystrophic calcifications, juxtaglomerular
apparatus hyperplasia
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
CNI Toxicity Scoring
17
Results (PNP Biopsies)
C4d ve in 1 of 189 biopsies (NP, AR IB)
18
Protocol Biopsies
19
Diagnostic features of CNIT (n70)
TV tubular vacuoles AH arteriolar hyaline SF
striped fibrosis
20
End points for graft function
  • CNIT, BChS, MBChS and CADI correlated with
  • Creatinine Clearance (by Schwartz method)
  • Hypertension of anti-HTN agents to normalize
    blood pressure
  • Proteinuria
  • CNIT score also correlated with Tacrolimus trough
    levels (ng/ml) and dosage (mg/kg)

21
Follow up
  • Mean follow up period 25.7 months (range 24-44
    months)
  • 2 patients died with functioning grafts
  • None had urine protein/creatinine ratio gt 1
  • Mean Creatinine Clearance at 24 months 88.2
    ml/min (range 46-135)
  • Mean anti-HTN agents 0.27 (range 0-2)

22
Results
  • By Pearson parametric correlation (one side test)
  • CNI Toxicity Score at 3 months significantly
    correlates with 12 mo CrCl (p0.021, r2-0.54)
    and 24 mo CrCl (p0.03, r2 -0.58)

23
Results
  • No correlation with hypertension, Tacrolimus dose
    or levels
  • CADI, BChS and MBChS did not correlate with
    outcome
  • CNIT and MBChS seem to correlate with each other

gs, ct and ci are common parameters in both
24
Scoring of Protocol Biopsies
25
Parameters of CNIT Score
Gsglomerulosclerosis cttubular atrophy
ciinterstitial fibrosis aharteriolar hyaline
tvtubular vacuolization
26
Can we create a CNIT scoring model ?
  • We reduced the of parameters to create the
    model for CNIT score
  • -0.161.05 gs 2.05 ct 0.94 ah 1.03 tv

(Plt0.001 r2-0.95)
Gs glomerulosclerosis ct tubular atrophy ah
arteriolar hyaline tv tubular vacuolization
27
Testing the validity of the model
  • Identified 14 patients with CNI toxicity on 3
    month protocol biopsy with at least 12 months
    follow up
  • Patients on steroid based (3) and steroid free
    (11) immunosuppression
  • 11 patients had 24 mo post- txp follow up

28
Validity..
  • Mean CNIT score (calculated using model) 4.08
    (range 1.97-9.28)
  • 3 month CNIT score correlated significantly
  • 12 mo CrCl (p 0.02 r2 -0.54)
  • 24 mo CrCl (p 0.004 r2 -0.75)

29
CNIT Score Correlation with 12 mo CrCl (p0.02)
30
CNIT Score Correlation with 24 mo CrCl (p0.004)
31
Scoring System
  • Is linear scoring of parameters better?
  • Image analysis may be helpful
  • Need to validate the data with more protocol
    biopsies (steroid free and steroid based
    regimens)
  • We are probably underestimating the incidence of
    CNI toxicity

32
Conclusions
  • CNIT score helpful in objective grading
  • A diagnosis of CNIT requires aggressive
    monitoring of CNI therapy
  • Need to modify maintenance immunosuppression
  • Arteriolar hyaline most important factor and
    likely irreversible cause of progressive loss of
    graft function

33
Acknowledgements
  • Minnie Sarwal M.D., Ph.D.
  • Suja Nagarajan, M.D.
  • Sheryl Shah
  • Li Li
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com