SC Johnson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

SC Johnson

Description:

SCJ will supply and equip employees and dependents with the tools and incentives ... Hospital and surgical teams with a collaborative relationship focused on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:515
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: scjohn
Category:
Tags: johnson

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SC Johnson


1
SC Johnson Son, Inc.
  • Center of Excellence
  • Health Care Strategy
  • Kevin W. McCabe, M.D.
  • Corporate Medical Director
  • August 16, 2006

2
SC Johnson, A Family Company
  • Racine, Wisconsin

3
SC Johnson, A Family Company
  • Founded in 1886 as a manufacturer of parquet
    flooring, S. C. Johnson Son, Inc. is a leading
    provider of innovative consumer products that
    make life easier and homes cleaner, safer and
    healthier for families around the world.

4
SC Johnson, A Family Company
  • In 1998 we framed our health care strategy around
    the question. . .

5
SC Johnson, A Family Company
  • How do we reduce health care inflation to a rate
    that we can afford so we can continue to provide
    health care benefits to our employees?

6
SC Johnson Health Care Strategy
  • In answer, we developed a Health Care Strategy
    that centers around the following 4 concepts

7
SC Johnson Health Care Strategy
  • Employees and dependents have a responsibility
    to be better stewards of their health and
    healthcare.

8
SC Johnson Health Care Strategy
  • Employees and dependents need to be more
    conscientious consumers of health care.

9
SC Johnson Health Care Strategy
  • SCJ will supply and equip employees and
    dependents with the tools and incentives to
    become better stewards and consumers.

10
SC Johnson Health Care Strategy
  • SCJ will work with local providers to improve the
    quality of care.

11
Healthcare Principles The Ideal State
  • The patient should be in a position to be his/her
    own best health advocate.
  • Doctors and hospitals should provide both the
    highest quality health care and keep patients
    well including measuring and reporting how
    effectively they accomplish both.
  • SCJ will actively enable the patient and
    providers to achieve these goals and as the
    primary payer of health care costs, SCJ expects
    accountability from both parties.

12
SCJ Actions Taken to Support the Ideal State
  • Actions supporting the patient as his/her own
    best health advocate are
  • Smart Steps Disease Management
  • Mayo E Healthcare/Ask Mayo clinical support tools
  • Prescription drug formulary and mail order
    programs
  • Healthy Choice program with health risk
    assessment Smart Steps Disease Management and
    lifestyle coaching
  • Medical Centers of Excellence (MCOE) Programs
  • Updated preventive care schedule
  • Health Saving Account option (Flex 6)
  • Overarching employee communication efforts

13
SCJ Actions Taken to Support the Ideal State
  • Actions supporting providers in delivering the
    highest quality care are
  • Active Health Management (AHM)
  • Medical Centers of Excellence (MCOE) Programs
  • Continue a dialog with All Saints regarding their
    role as a community hospital
  • UR/case management

14
Why Medical Centers of Excellence?
  • The quality and cost of health care varies
    dramatically from one institution to the next.
  • There is no relationship of cost to quality.
  • 1999 Institute of Medicine Report, To Err is
    Human estimated that medical errors in hospitals
    cause between 44,000-98,000 avoidable deaths each
    year and even more injuries.
  • As opposed to most industries where the
    manufacturer pays to fix mistakes, mistakes in
    hospitals lead to more care and more charges that
    the patient (customer) pays for.

15
Why Medical Centers of Excellence?
  • (continued)
  • These quality problems exact a human toll, not
    only in terms of lost lives and pain and
    suffering, but also create a huge economic burden
    in terms of direct costs of treating
    complications and in indirect costs of lost
    productivity and premature death.
  • The Juran Institute estimates that 30 of all
    direct health care outlays today are the result
    of poor quality care consisting of overuse,
    misuse and waste.

16
Why Medical Centers of Excellence?
  • (continued)
  • With national health expenditures roughly 1.7
    trillion in 2004, the 30 figure translates into
    510 billion spent each year as the direct result
    of poor quality.
  • We would like to improve the odds of
    employees/dependents getting quality care.

17
Center of Excellence Goals
  • To educate employees that there are differences
    in quality among providers.
  • To help employees see differences in qualities
    can have very significant effect on outcomes.

18
Center of Excellence Goals
  • To encourage the notion that employees must take
    responsibility to be better informed and more
    engaged managers of their own health.
  • To create a desire in employees to seek out COEs.

19
Centers of Excellence
  • A regional Centers of Excellence program will
  • Target high cost procedures where substantial
    variation in quality and cost of care exist.
  • Utilize SCJs presence and reputation to get
    health care providers to compete on quality and
    value.

20
Centers of Excellence, Plan Design
  • Applies to all Flex choices
  • Provider steerage mechanism
  • Current steerage is 2x out of pocket maximum when
    non COE providers are used.
  • Geography includes
  • SE Wisconsin
  • Lake County, Illinois
  • Bay City, Michigan

21
Centers of Excellence, Plan Design
  • COE selection criteria was developed by a team
    consisting of outside consultants from Towers
    Perrin, key people from the SCJ Benefits
    Department and Corporate Medical Services.
  • Selection Criteria was divided into 2 sections
  • Clinical Quality Criteria - 65 pts.
  • Health System Structure - 32 pts.

22
Selection Criteria
  • The key factors driving selection decision were
  • Specific clinical criteria that is measurable and
    reportable, such as high case volume in the
    specified procedure, low mortality rates, low
    complication rates and appropriate length of
    stay.
  • Hospital and surgical teams with a collaborative
    relationship focused on delivering consistent
    high quality care.
  • Hospital and surgical teams willing to work with
    SCJ on expediting patient consultations and
    surgical procedures, as clinically appropriate.

23
Selection Criteria
  • (continued)
  • The key factors driving our selection decision
    were
  • Hospital is willing and able to provide relevant
    clinical data on SCJ MCOE cases as well as
    overall quality measures.
  • Hospitals interested in patient satisfaction with
    care.
  • Hospitals with recent or planned investments in
    facilities or treatment that specifically support
    a high quality of care for each designated MCOE
    would be viewed favorably.

24
Reporting and Participation Standards
  • We asked for the following information
  • Describe your systems ability to support MCOE
    data gathering and reporting of quality and
    volume indicators.
  • Will you be able to provide reports showing case
    volume and mortality and complication rates?
  • Will you be able to track outcome results (i.e.,
    readmission rates, follow up care required)?
  • Can you provide aggregate quality reports?

25
Complications
  • At both hospital and physician level, we sought
    information about
  • Blood clots
  • GI hemorrhage/ulcer
  • Would infections
  • Nosocomial infections

26
Clinical Quality
  • How is clinical quality defined at your
    institution? Provide organizational chart of
    your quality committee.
  • Do you provide quality data to the state,
    Leapfrog Group or other monitoring entity?
  • What quality measures do you measure and track?
  • Did you know how your performance for the
    targeted services compares to other institutions?
  • Provide quality data for the most recent 6
    quarters.
  • Provide prior fiscal years data for volume,
    mortality, complication rates and ALOS (average
    length of stay).

27
Clinical Quality
  • (continued)
  • Do you staff ICU/CUU with intensivists?
  • Do you have an automated order entry system?
  • Is your facility a magnet hospital?
  • What are your RN staff turnovers and vacancy
    rates?
  • Do you have common standard orders that all
    physicians use?

28
Hospital Structure and Surgeon Collaboration
  • Do you have a chief of the surgical subspecialty
    department? Please describe his/her role.
  • How many surgeons have privileges to perform the
    MCOE covered procedures?
  • Complete chart for volume of surgery for 2003 and
    2004 for each physician.
  • Describe hospitals relationship with surgeon
    (i.e., employed, independent).
  • Would your facility be willing to name a subgroup
    of surgeons for the COE?

29
Hospital Structure and Surgeon Collaboration
  • (continued)
  • What criteria does your institution use to grant
    surgical privileges?
  • Do your require all physicians to treat patients
    via protocols?
  • How do you monitor physician compliance with
    protocols?
  • Describe any efforts under way to reduce medical
    errors.

30
Hospital Structure and Surgeon Collaboration
  • (continued)
  • If selected as an MCOE are you willing to discuss
    and implement a warranty of care?
  • Has your program received any awards (i.e., US
    News and World Report - Best Hospitals)?

31
MCOE Committee Selection Process
  • Committee reviewed all RFIs.
  • Weighted the answers with hospital and surgeon
    volume getting the most weighting.
  • Reduced the list to 3-4 hospitals for each COE.
  • Toured the finalist hospitals, met staff and
    surgeons.
  • Summarized the visits and voted on which
    hospitals would be included in MCOE.

32
MCOE Committee Selection Process
  • Launched extensive communication to employees as
    COEs were selected for
  • Joint Replacement
  • Back Care
  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Coronary Bypass Surgery and Angioplasty
  • Joint Replacement Program was initiated in
    January 2004.

33
Centers Of Excellence - Obstacles
  • Concept of guarantee of care
  • Employee buy in that COEs are for their benefit
  • Employees need to believe COEs are not a health
    care take away

34
How Is It Working So Far?
  • What are the indicators used to track progress?
  • Centers need to provide quality outcome data on a
    yearly basis.
  • Well be tracking our joint replacements to see
    if there is steerage toward COEs.
  • Centers will provide us with patient satisfaction
    data.

35
SC Johnson, A Family Company
  • QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com