Title: Preliminary School Closure Feasibility Study
1Preliminary School ClosureFeasibility Study
- SD No. 67 (Okanagan Skaha)
- January 2004
2Context Why was a preliminary feasibility study
needed?
- 2003/2004 final step to reconfiguration plan
- Declining enrolment past and future
- The increasing number of vacant classrooms
- Working with a revised provincial Funding
Allocation System - Funding constraints
- Service cuts
- Capital plan/facility planning
32003/2004 Final Step to Reconfiguration Plan
- Open KVR
- Open SLMS, SMS
- Open McNicoll Middle
- Open PMSS
4Is there a history of school closure in the
District?
- As part of reconfiguration
- OConnell was closed
- K-5 distributed to Carmi and Queens Park
- Snowdon was closed
- K-5 distributed to Parkway and Wiltse
- McDonald was closed
- K-5 distributed to Trout Creek and Giants Head
- All were guided with a transition process
5Declining Enrolment
6Elementary (K-5) EnrolmentPenticton Zone
1992-2012
7Birthrate at Penticton Regional Hospital
8Surplus Elementary Seats- Penticton Zone
9Financial Allocation System
- The money is the money.
- Custodial and maintenance no longer based on
facility number and size. - Declining enrolment will increase the funding
problem for custodial and maintenance. - Almost total reliance on pupil FTE for all
funding. - Several special education categories consolidated
into per pupil grant.
10Funding Constraints Service Cuts
- 2002 shortfall of 2.25 million
- Across the board service cuts of 2.5
- 2003 shortfall of 1.5 million
- Service cuts in secondary staffing, shortened
school year for custodial, clerical, and bus
services, cut career orientation, plus use of one
time grant.
11Other Contextual Issues
- Reconfiguration has created more surplus
elementary facility space. - 2003 Report to Board projects a school closure
could save up to 200,000 annually. - September 2003 Board passed Policy 750 to govern
any potential school closure. - September 2003 Board directed development of a
Preliminary Feasibility Report on School Closure.
12What question is addressed by the Preliminary
School Closure Feasibility Study?
The question From a facility focus, could a
school be closed
13Is there surplus facility space?
- Secondary there is NOT sufficient surplus space
to allow for the closure of a secondary school. - Middle there is NOT sufficient surplus space to
allow for the closure of a middle school. - Elementary there IS sufficient surplus space to
allow for the closure of one or more elementary
schools. - Elementary will be examined in 4 zones Kaleden,
Naramata, Penticton, and Summerland.
14Surplus Facility Space Elementary
- Summerland there is no time during the
projection period to 2012 when an elementary
school could be closed in Summerland. There is
not sufficient surplus facility space.
15Surplus Facility Space Elementary
- Kaleden Naramata either or both could be
accommodated in Penticton zone schools. - The loss of the small community grant and the
increased busing costs with such a move greatly
reduce savings. - The value of having a school as part of any small
community must be given considerable weight. - A low priority option.
16Surplus Facility Space Elementary (Penticton)
- Penticton there is sufficient surplus facility
space in the Penticton zone elementary schools to
close one or more schools. - In 2004 it is anticipated that there will be 350
surplus elementary seats in Penticton. - This number is expected to grow to 490 by 2008
(enrolment low point). - 2003 kindergarten numbers 15 below projections .
17 Facility Site Considerations
- Reviewed facility audit results for all Penticton
zone schools. - Nkwala Carmi significantly lower than the
others. - Nkwala facility and site audit results
considerably lower than Carmi.
18Preliminary Factors Supporting the Closure of
Nkwala
- No multi-purpose space available.
- Existing library facility below standard.
- Learning assistance and special education spaces
below standard. - Administrative office spaces below standard.
- No fire sprinkler system exists.
- Deficient HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and
lighting systems. - Site lacks space for access, parking, renovation.
19More Preliminary Factors Supporting the Closure
of Nkwala
- There is a zonal surplus of elementary seats.
- Nkwala is surrounded by alternative neighborhood
schools Carmi, Uplands and Columbia. - Closure of a school will significantly reduce
further cuts due to 200,000 operating savings.
20Preliminary Factors of Concern in a Nkwala Closure
- Pupil travel routes to Uplands, Carmi, and/or
Columbia. - Loss of the contribution of Nkwala to the
community of Nkwala. - Nkwalas positive history of contribution and
service. - Balance of interests District/Nkwala community.
- Timelines.
- These factors form part of the consultation
phase.
21Timeline
- January 12 - Regular Board Meeting
- Receipt of report
- Decision whether to proceed with consultation
phase
22Further Timeline Details
- Sixty day consultation period
- Notice of public forum(s)
- Community briefing(s)
- Public Board Meeting - 1st Reading of By-Law
- Public Board Meeting/final reading of By-Law (14
days between meetings)
23Timeline Considerations
- Contractual deadlines for notice of lay-off or
transfer - Sufficient time to make the changes
- Appropriate notice period to parents
- Time to prepare the students
- Time for school transition process
- Time to close with honours
24Preliminary School Closure Feasibility Study
- Provides information on whether a Penticton
elementary school could be closed from a
facility perspective only. - Provides information on the timelines associated.
- Answers What could be done? but does not answer
What should be done?
25Consultation Process Time for
- the community to be informed by the District.
- the community to develop perspectives on the
issue. - the Board to hear community perspectives on the
issue. - collection of other information.
- Board consideration and deliberation.
26Does this Preliminary School Closure Feasibility
Report Recommend a Closure?
- The report concludes
- A closure is possible from a facility perspective
- Nkwala is the top candidate. - The closure would lead to financial savings.
- Savings would come from administrative, clerical,
and custodial/ maintenance services. - The quality of service to students will be
protected by a closure.
27What Are the Next Steps?
- January submission of the Report to the Board
the public - January 12 Board decision on action to be taken
on the report consultation - Establish Nkwala Closure Advisory Committee
28Nkwala Closure Advisory Committee
- Membership
- 2 Nkwala Parents
- 2 Teachers
- Principal
- Liaison Trustee
- CUPE Rep
- Secretary-Treasurer
- Assistant Superintendent (Chair)
29Nkwala Closure Advisory Committee
- Purpose
- Advise the District on the agenda for the public
forum. - Provide information and advice to the
Superintendent related to the school closure
decision-making process and, if applicable, the
school closure process. - Raise questions related to the closure process.
- Provide information to the Nkwala parents through
minutes and newsletters as appropriate.
30Timeline for a June 2004 closure
- January 12-March 31 consultation period
- January 26 Advisory Meeting
- January 27 Community Forum
- March 1 Regular Board Meeting/notice to amend
catchment areas - March 11 Community Forum
- April 5 Regular Board Meeting - first reading of
By-Law (50 days notice) - April 5 Regular Board Meeting/amend transfer
dates - April 30 student transfer application deadline
as amended - April 19 Special Board Meeting - final reading
of By-Law
31Consultation Process Time for
- the community to be informed by the District.
- the community to develop perspectives on the
issue. - the Board to hear community perspectives on the
issue. - collection of other information.
- Board consideration and deliberation.
32Preliminary School ClosureFeasibility Study
- SD No. 67 (Okanagan Skaha)
- January 2004