Title: P1252122141OYSwg
1Industrial Microbiology INDM 4005 Lecture
15 24/03/04
2Process variables
3Introduction
- In 1995 the symposium,
- Immobilised Cells Basics and Applications
- was organised under the auspices of the working
party of applied catalysis of the European
Federation of Biotechnology - Symposium covered the path from basic
physiological research to bioprocess applications - Immobilised cells, Springer lab manual Wijffels,
R.H
4Introduction
- In a previous lecture we learnt that higher
dilution rates can lead to - - higher biomass productivity
- But
- - higher substrate concentrations in the
effluent and lower biomass concentrations in the
reactor - When the dilution rate exceeds the critical
dilution rate then washout occurs.
5Introduction
- These factors result in a number of problems.
- E.g in continuous wastewater treatment processes
- Minimum reactor volume is set by the critical
dilution rate. - High dilution rates will lead to an effluent
containing high concentrations of "substrate" and
the effluent will therefore contain not have been
treated properly. - Low cell concentrations at high dilution rates
will also make the reactor sensitive to
inhibitors in the feed. Inhibitors would cause
the specific growth rate of the cells to drop and
cause the cells to washout. The lower the
concentration of cells, then the faster the cells
will washout.
6Introduction
- In chemostat processes similar consequences can
occur. If the substrates are expensive, e.g
animal cell culture, high dilution rates can
dramatically affect process profitablility. - Immobilizing cells in the fermenter ensures that
cells do not washout when the critical dilution
rate is exceeded. - By immobilizing the cells in the fermenter, high
cell numbers can be maintained at dilution rates
which exceed µm. - Therefore in an immobilised continuous fermenter
system high cell counts can be maintained leading
to higher biomass productivity as compared to a
normal chemostat.
7Advantages over suspension cultures
- (1). Immobilisation provides high cell
concentration - (2). Immobilisation provides cell reuse and
eliminates the costly processes of cell
recovery and cell recycle - (3). Immobilisation eliminates cell washout
problems at high dilution rates - (4). Combination of high cell concentrations and
high flow rates allows high volumetric
productivities - (5). Favourable microenvironmental conditions
- (6). Improves genetic stability
- (7). Protects against shear damage
8Advantages of immobilised cell reactors
- Being able to maintain high cell concentrations
in the reactor at high dilution rates provides
immobilised cell bioreactors with advantages over
chemostats. - More biomass means that the fermenter contains
more biocatalysts, thereby high bioconversion
rates can be achieved. - Immobilised cell bioreactors are also more stable
than chemostats.
9A higher cell concentration in the immobilised
bioreactor prevents the microbial population from
completely washing out.
Inhibitor enters inlet feed
Immobilised bioreactor
Biomass
Chemostat
Time
10- In a chemostat, a temporary (transient) increase
in the dilution rate will cause a rapid drop in
cell numbers. The entry of a slug of toxic
substances in the feed will have the same effect.
It will take time for the cells numbers to build
up again. Since the cells are not as easily
washed out of an immobilized cell reactor, the
recovery time will be more quicker and fall in
biomass concentration will be smaller.
11- If the toxic substance is a substrate (eg. in the
waste treatment of toxic wastewaters), high cell
concentrations will be able to more rapidly
utilize any slug of toxins which may enter the
reactor. The resultant sag in biomass
concentration will be smaller and the rise in
concentration of the inhibitory substance will
also be much smaller with immobilized cell
reactors.
12- The higher productivity and greater stability of
immobilized fermenters thus leads to smaller
fermenter requirements and considerable savings
in capital and energy costs.
13Limitations
- (1). Often the product of interest has to be
excreted from the cell - (2). Complications with diffusional limitations
- (3). Control of microenvironment conditions is
difficult due to heterogeneity in the system - (4). Growth and gas evolution can lead to
mechanical disruption of the immobilised matrix
14Types of immobilisation
- Active immobilisation
- Passive immobilisation
15Active immobilisation
- Is entrapment or binding of cells by physical or
chemical forces - Physical entrapment within porous matrices is the
most widely used method of cell immobilisation - Immobilised beads should be porous enough to
allow transport of substrates and products in and
out of the beads
16Active immobilisation
- Beads can be prepared by
-
- 1) Gelation of polymers
- 2) Precipitation of polymers
- 3) Ion exchange gelation
- 4) Polycondensation
- 5) Polymerisation
- 6) Encapsulation
17Passive immobilisation
- Biological films
- The multilayered growth of cells on solid support
surfaces - The support material can be inert or biologically
active - Biofilm formation is common in natural and
industrial fermentation systems, i.e biological
wastewater treatment and mold fermentations
18Description of support material
- The Hydrogels
- Natural
- Carrageenan
- Alginate
- Agar
- Gelatin
- Synthetic
- Polyvinyl alcohol
- Polyurethane
- Polyethylene glycol
19Carrageenan
- Extracted from seaweed and a gel is derived by
stabilisation with K ions or by thermogelation
(reducing the temperature at low ion
concentration) - Carrageenan consists of alternating structures of
D-galactose 4-sulphate and 3,6-anhydro-D-galactose
2-sulphate - Carrageenan matrix becomes weak when disturbing
ions are present
20The seaweed Chondrus crispus. Image width ca 15
cm.
21Alginate
- Alginate is derived from algae and is stabilised
by divalent cations - It consists of 1-4 bonded D-mannuronic and
L-guluronic acids groups - Gels are formed due to binding of divalent metal
cations to the guluronic acids groups - Most commonly used cation is Ca2
22Laminaria hyperborea forest. Image width ca 3 m.
23General characteristics of natural hydrogels
- Cells survive mild immobilisation methods
- Cells grow easily in matrix
- The diffusion coefficients of substrates are high
- Relatively cheap
- The matrixes are soluble
- Relatively weak
- Biodegradable
24Synthetic gels
- Lately several gel-forming synthetic pre-polymers
have been developed - Polymerisation or crosslinking is carried out in
the presence of the microorganism - Rather hostile process leads to activity losses
25General characteristics of synthetic gels
- Low or no solubility
- Low or no biodegradability
- Strong
- Diffusivity of substrates relatively low
- Recovery of immobilised cells relatively low
- Relatively expensive
26Bioencapsulation or Gel Immobilised cells
- Process intensification
- results in high level of biomass which improves
productivity - cells recovered easily
- higher flow-through rates in continuous systems
- Protection
- cells protected from stress e.g. pH, temp etc.
useful in inoculum delivery
27Immobilised vs free cells
- YEASTS - immobilised produce more ethanol
- RECOMBINANT CULTURE - plasmid stability improved
on immobilisation
28Bead entrapment - gel matrix and products
- Non-toxic
- Agarose
- Calcium alginate
- Carrageenan
- can be toxic
- Polyacrylamide -
- Polyvinyl alcohol
- PRODUCTS
- antibiotics
- ethanol
- citric acid
- penicillin
- phenol degradation
29Entrapment (beads) vs encapsulation (capsules)
- Entrapment
- cells leak
- large beads, surface layer of growth
- biomass disrupts matrix (limits to 25 by volume)
30 Pregel dissolving 2 step method
- calcium alginate bead containing cells formed
first - then coated in poly-L-lysine crosslinked with
sodium alginate - finally calcium alginate core dissolved using
sodium citrate method
31Liquid-droplet one step method
- Opposite of conventional bead formation
- cells curing solution (calcium chloride)
dropped into sodium alginate solution - results in a gel skin formed on surface of the
drop with cells contained in liquid centre - cells are allowed to grow to increase level of
biomass encapsulated
32Mass production - industrial scale
- Dropping methods have limitation - can be
improved by - increasing number of needles
- liquid jet-based method - form drops by
- vibration
- cut with wires
- Centrifugal force vs gravity
- concentric - cells, polymer and air extruded
separately
33Types of immobilized cell reactors
- There are many types of immobilized cell reactors
either in use or under development. - In this section we will look at four major
classes of immobilized cell reactors - Cell recycle systems
- Fixed bed reactors
- Fluidized bed reactors
- Flocculated cell systems
34Cell recycle systems
- In a fermenter with cell recycle the cells are
separated from the effluent and then recycled
back to the fermenter thus minimising cell
removal from the fermenter
35Cell recycle system
Fresh feed
Biomass separation system
Effluent
Fermenter
Biomass recycle
36Cell recycle systems
- Cell recycle is used in activated sludge systems.
A portion of the cells are separated in a
settling tank and returned to the activated
sludge fermenter. - Biomass recycling for product or biomass
production is more difficult due to the need for
maintaining sterility during cell separation.
Centrifugation which is a faster process than
settling would be used to separate the cells. - Biomass recycle systems can be easily modelled.
37Fixed bed reactors
- In fixed bed fermenters, the cells are
immobilized by absorption on or entrapment in
solid, non-moving solid surfaces.
38Fixed bed reactors
- In one type of fixed bed fermenter, the cells are
immobilized on the surfaces of immobile solid
particles such as - plastic blocks
- concrete blocks
- wood shavings or
- fibrous material such as plastic or glass wool.
- The liquid feed is either pumped through or
allowed to trickle over the surface of the solids
where the immobilized cells convert the
substrates into products.
39Fixed bed reactors
- Once steady state has been reached there will be
a continuous cell loss from the solid surfaces.
These types of fermenters are widely used in
waste treatment - In other types of fixed-bed fermenters, the cells
are immobilized in solidified gels such as agar
or carrageenin
40Fixed bed reactors
- In these fermenters, the cells are physically
trapped inside the pores of the gels and thus
giving better cell retention and a large
effective surface area for cell entrapment. - In order to increase the surface area for cell
immobilization, some researchers have
investigated the use of hollow fibres and pleated
membranes as immobilization surfaces. - Industrial applications of fixed bed reactors
include - waste water treatment
- production of enzymes and amino acids
- steroid transformations
41Fixed bed reactors
- One advantage fixed bed reactors is that
non-growing cells can be used. - In such systems, the cells enzymatically act on
substrates in the feed. - The cells can be either inactivated or not fed
nutrients required for growth.
42Fluidised bed reactors
- In fluidized-bed fermenters the cells are
immobilized on or in small particles. - The use of small particles increases the surface
area for cell immobilization and mass transfer. - Because the particles are small and light, they
can be easily made to flow with the liquid (ie.
fluidised).
43Fluidised bed reactors
Small moving particles
44Fluidized bed reactors
- The fluidisation of the particles in the reactor
leads to the surface of the particles being
continuously turned over. This also increases the
mass transfer rate. - Fluidised beds are typically categorized as
either being a - 2 phase system which are not aerated and
- 3 phase system which is aerated by sparging
- Fluidized bed bioreactors are used widely in
wastewater treatment.
45Fluidized bed reactors
- Fluidized bed bioreactors are also used for
animal cell culture. - Animal cells are trapped in gels or on the
surface of special particles known as
"microcarriers". - Fluidized bed reactors are one example of
perfusion culture technology used for animal cell
culture.
46Comparing fluidised bed and fixed reactors
- Fluidised bed reactors are considerably more
efficient than fixed bed reactors for the
following reasons - 1) A high concentration of cells can be
immobilized in the reactor due to the larger
surface area for cell immobilization is available
- 2) Mass transfer rates are higher due to the
larger surface area and the higher levels of
mixing in the reactor. - 3) Fluidised bed reactors do not clog as easily
as fixed bed reactors.
47Comparing fluidised bed and fixed reactors
- Fluidised bed reactors are however more difficult
to design than fixed bed reactors. - Design considerations include
- Setting the flow rate to achieve fluidisation
- Ensuring that bubble size remains small during
the fermentation. - Prevention of the cells from falling or
"sloughing" off the particles. - Minimising particle damage.
48Flocculated cell reactors
- In flocculated cell reactors, the cells are
trapped in the reactor due to an induced or
natural flocculation process. In flocculation
cells tend to group together causing them to come
out of solution and to sink towards the base of
the reactor. - Flocculated cell reactors are used widely in
anaerobic waste treatment processes. - In these reactors, the methanogenic and other
bacteria form natural flocs. The flocs move due
to the release of methane and carbon dioxide by
the cells.
49Flocculated cell reactors
- Large scale anaerobic flocculated cell systems,
known as Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket
processes are widely used in Europe for the
anaerobic digestion of high strength industrial
wastewaters. - The reactors are typically egg-shaped.
50Flocculated cell reactors
Cells form flocs which gently fall and rise with
gases they produce
51 Some applications
- ENCAPSEL - retained antibody plus mamalian cells
in capsule during growth in bioreactor - Artificial seeds - polymer coating protects plant
embryo
52Artifical cells/organs
- Leukocytes antibodies cannot penetrate into
membranes ? immunological rejection avoided - Encapsulated hepatocytes placed into rat with
defect in bilirubin uridine diphosphate
glucuronyltransferase - Genetically engineered encapsulated E. coli into
rats with renal failure (lowered plasma urea)
53Biosorbents
- Remove heavy metals
- AlgaSORB - immobilised algae cells in silica gel
beads - S. cerevisiae and Zoogleoa ramigera immobilised
in calcium alginate capsules used in removal of
lead and cadmium
54RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY and PROCESS
INSTABILITY
- Smallest unit of reaction is gene / plasmid
- Specialist cultures have been developed
- Non-robust nature e.g. plasmid instability
- Generalist cultures represent the competing
contamination
55BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS
(changing environmental conditions)
- Waste-treatment, Bioremediation
- Biological control
- Oil-breakdown
- Agricultural e.g. rhizobium, mycorrhiza, silage
- Food e.g. meat fermentation, yogurt
56CONVENTIONAL STRATEGY FOR STABILIZATION OF
BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES (e.g. STR)
- Eliminate contamination / competition
- Regulate process environment
-
HOMOGENEITY PARADIGM OFTEN DOMINATES MICROBIOLOGY
57STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME PERTURBATIONS
1. Modification of cell physiology And
biochemistry to produce a Supercompetitor
Genetic 2. Create microenvironments to help the
inocula Microbial ecology
58ECOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF ANY INOCULA is
influenced by
- INTRACELLULAR PERTURBATION
- Modification of replicon
- Modification of extrinsic factors e.g nutrient
limitation, selective agents etc. - EXTRACELLULAR PERTURBATIONS
- Modification of process factors
- Growth in bioreactor
- Harvesting, storage and transport conditions
- Delivery to ultimate site of action
59COMBINED STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME PERTURBATIONS
- Modification of cell physiology
- Create microenvironments
- - to optimize activity of desired culture
- Protect
- - to optimize adaptation and release to new
environment - Controlled / sustained delivery
60CONSIDER SPATIALLY ORGANIZED MICROBIAL
POPULATIONS and STABILITY (in nature)
- DIMENSIONS MAY BE
- Vertical
- peat, soil, water etc.
- Horizontal
- colony formation
- Radial
- activated sludge flocs, yeast flocs
61STABILISATION FROM ICT
- Protective effect from encapsulation within a
matrix - Manipulation of diffusion rates
- Co-immobilization of different phases, food
sources, selective chemicals and/or protectants - Cell release in defined / controlled patterns
62GEL-IMMOBILIZED CELLS AND ARTIFICIAL MICROCOSMS /
MICROENVIRONMENTS
- Combine ecological mechanisms based on
- enhanced stress resistance
- juxtapositioning of cells
- protection afforded within aggregates/flocs
- Are based on space and/or time dimensions
- targeted delivery
- controlled release
63MICRONICHES existing in ALGINATE GELS
- PROFILE INFLUENCED BY
- Removal rate and diffusivity of molecules
- Bead characteristics
- Matrix properties
- Homogeneity of matrix
- Diameter
- Microbial characteristics
- Morphology
- Biomass density
- Biomass activity
64CHARACTERISTICS OF GEL
- PROPERTIES OF BOTH LIQUID AND SOLID
- Shape retention,
- Resistance to mechanical stress.
- PHYSICALLY IMMOBILIZED WATER
- Similar to semi-permeable membrane,
- Water soluble molecules can diffuse,
- Water moves in / out (dry) depending on
external environment.
65SUSTAINED / CONTROLLED DELIVERY
- DEGREE OF PROTECTION
- Profiles of substrate, end-products, metabolites
- Co-immobilisation of beneficial cultures, complex
nutrients, protectants, selective chemicals and
pH or osmotic regulators. - DEGREE OF CELL RELEASE
- Rate of outgrowth, polymer characteristics,
gelation process, particle characteristics,
biomass activity, macroenvironment. - (McLoughlin, A.J., Adv. Biochem. Eng. /
Biotechnol., 1994)
66Summary
- Why use immobilisation advantages over
suspension cultures - Some limitations of ICT
- Types of immobilisation
- Immobilisation matrixes
- Types of immobilised cell reactors
- Applications of immobilised cells
67Conclusions
- ICT ADVANTAGES
- 1. Increased reaction rates e.g. higher flow
rates - 2. Higher cell densities
- 3. Repeated use of biocatalyst
- 4. Minimal cost for cell separation