Remarks on Bringsjord - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Remarks on Bringsjord

Description:

Professor of Logic, Cognitive Science, and Computer Science ... Demonstrating this w/ OTTER... First please note: Selmer's Hypotheses ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: selmerbri
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Remarks on Bringsjord


1
Remarks on Bringsjords NIMD RD
  • Selmer Bringsjord
  • (w/ JW, WG, MS,)
  • Professor of Logic, Cognitive Science, and
    Computer Science
  • Rensselaer AI Reasoning (RAIR) Laboratory
    (Director)
  • Department of Cognitive Science (Chair)
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)
  • Troy NY 12180 USA
  • 4.24.03 _at_ RPI

2
Old InaccurateTop-Level Architecture Sketch
3
New Top-Level Architecture
recursive!
NOTE Nothing in this architecture implies what
runs on what machine. E.g., data collected from
the cockpit controlled by a human might well stay
on the same machine responsible for running the
game.
4
Top-Level Architecture Sketch
Need both pair of P/A arrows perpetually
horizontal makes assisting human IA possible
vertical makes simulating reasoning of human IA
possible
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Scenario Structure Needed
8
Remember Scenario Has to be Formalized
Proof 1
9
Step 2 in Scenario Formalization
Proof 2
10
Demonstrating this w/ OTTER
First please note
11
Selmers Hypotheses
  • Non-analysts with three or more courses in formal
    logic will outperform trained analysts with years
    of experience when both groups performance is
    measured in connection with well-defined
    scenarios.
  • (It would be most interesting to have three
    groups to compare non-analysts trained in
    formal logic, experienced analysts, and
    experienced analysts explicitly training in the
    Wigmorean style.)
  • The standard training of analysts is more
    efficacious when extensive training in formal
    logic (three or more courses) is added.

12
(Mini) Scenario 1
(1) The following three assertions are either all
true or all false If Billy is an Al Qaeda
sleeper, Doreen is. If Doreen is an Al Qaeda
sleeper, Frank is as well. If Frank is an Al
Qaeda sleeper, so is Emma. (2) The following
assertion is definitely true Billy is an Al
Qaeda sleeper.
Can it be inferred from (1) and (2) that Emma is
an Al Qaeda sleeper?
13
(Mini) Scenario 2
If one of the following assertions is true then
so is the other (1) There is an Al Qaeda
sleeper in United Airlines baggage crew if and
only if there is an employee who is a member of
Ayran Brotherhood in UAs baggage crew. (2)
There is an Al Qaeda sleeper in UAs baggage
crew. Which is more likely to be in the UA crew,
if either the sleeper or the employee who is a
member of AB?
14
(Mini) Scenario Schema
Give information corresponding to givens in an
established scenario, such as Wigmore. Then give
a stem, and 5 options, with one key, and 4
distractors. Testing IAs can then be done
by piggybacking on established tests.
15
THE END
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com