13' The Role of Chance in Psychology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

13' The Role of Chance in Psychology

Description:

Two pack mules behind the others. First, pick a door. Then, Monty shows what's behind a door not picked always a mule. Now the real choice: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: christin173
Category:
Tags: chance | mule | psychology | role

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 13' The Role of Chance in Psychology


1
13. The Role of Chance in Psychology
  • Stanovich
  • Chapter 11

2
But Before that . . .
3
More on Probability
  • Remember, that human beings are not very good at
    probabilistic reasoning.
  • There are many reasoning fallacies that get in
    the way of our making accurate judgments.

4
Lets Make a Deal
  • Classic television game show from the 1960s and
    70s.

5
The 3 doors
  • Theres a new car behind one door.
  • Two pack mules behind the others.
  • First, pick a door.
  • Then, Monty shows whats behind a door not
    pickedalways a mule.

6
Now the real choice
  • Stick with the original choice or switch?
  • What are the odds?
  • 50-50? . . ?

7
The Solution
  • http//www.stat.tamu.edu/west/applets/LetsMakeaDe
    al.html

8
On to the role of chance . . .
9
Why Do We Seek Out Patterns In Life?
  • Humans feel a strong need to make order out of
    chaos

10
Seinfeld
  • The Statue
  • big coincidences and little coincidences
  • The Opposite
  • You see how it all evens out for me?

11
Randomly generated shapes are given structure
  • Rorscach test
  • Stanovich strongly in the anti-inkblot camp
  • There are actually certain times when this test
    is useful.
  • Interpretation is based on empirical data.
  • Rorschach test evaluated in the context of other
    tests too.

12
More shapes
  • What do you see?

13
More shapes
  • What do you see?

14
More shapes
  • What do you see?

15
More shapes
  • What do you see?
  • People like to see a pattern / impose structure.

16
Conspiracy theories
  • Layers layers of explanations to explain
    randomness

17
Top Ten Conspiracy Theories of 2002, by Mike
Ward, www.alternet.org
  • For about thirty minutes after his chief of
    staff told him that America was under attack,
    George W. Bush continued to sit in an elementary
    school classroom listening to a second-grader
    tell a story about a pet goat. He did a marvelous
    job of looking completely unsurprised. Meanwhile,
    four hijacked jumbo jets were able to fly
    off-course across several states without
    encountering any opposition from the most
    powerful and responsive air force in the world.
  • Less than a month later, on the pretext of
    pursuing terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden,
    the Bush administration began what it called a
    "war" on the impoverished and already war-torn
    country of Afghanistan. It turns out this assault
    had been in the works well before September 11
    took place. . .

18
The Illusion of Control
  • Lottery tickets
  • Do you pick your own numbers?
  • Lottery popularity dramatically increased when
    people were allowed to pick their numbers
  • If subjects picked their own tickets, they wanted
    4x as much money to sell them back
  • Just-World Hypothesis
  • People get what they deserve

19
Accept Error to Reduce Error
  • 70 red light 30 blue light
  • If guess red in all 100 trials you will be
    correct 70
  • If guessed red 70 and blue 30 in 100 trials
  • 70 trials will be red, you will be correct
    .70x7049 times
  • 30 trials will be blue, you will be correct
    .30x309
  • On all 100 trials, you are correct 58 times
  • 58 vs 70 (Neither is 100 accurate but 70 is
    better)

20
Clinical vs Actuarial Prediction
  • Clinical predictions are not as accurate as
    actuarial predictions
  • Even when
  • The clinician has all the information that goes
    into the actuarial equation
  • The clinician has extra information
  • The clinician has equation and is asked to modify
    the prediction (actually clinician increases
    error)

21
Does it always matter?
  • Psychologists and psychiatrists write reports and
    testify in court about offenders
  • The court wants to know can the person benefit
    from rehabilitation? What would help them? Are
    they at risk to re-offend?
  • Forensic Psychologists do in fact use actuarial
    measures of general criminal recidivism, risk of
    violence, risk of sexual violence, etc. AND
    clinical judgment

22
Should we do this?
  • Debate.
  • What do you think?
  • Explain why.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com