Philosophy%20of%20Mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy%20of%20Mathematics

Description:

Benacerraf, P., 'Mathematical Truth', in The Philosophy of Mathematics, Hart, W.D., (Ed. ... Hart, W.D., (Ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics, (1996), Oxford ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: martinfl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy%20of%20Mathematics


1
Philosophy of Mathematics
  • Efrah Ismael
  • Philosophy of Mathematics
  • 5400

2
References
  • Benacerraf, P., "Mathematical Truth", in The
    Philosophy of Mathematics, Hart, W.D., (Ed.),
    (1996), Oxford University Press, New York, p.
    14-30.
  • Coffa, J.A., The Semantic Tradition from Kant to
    Carnap To the Vienna Station, (1991), Cambridge
    University Press, New York.
  • Davis, P.J., Hersh, R., The Mathematical
    Experience, (1990), Penguin Books, Toronto.
  • Hart, W.D., (Ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics,
    (1996), Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Shapiro, Stewart, Philosophy of Mathematics
    Structure and Ontology, (2000), Oxford University
    Press

3
  • Dieudonné characterizes the mathematician as
    follows
  • we believe in the reality of mathematics, but
    of course when philosophers attack us with their
    paradoxes we rush to hide behind formalism and
    say "mathematics is just a combination of
    meaningless symbols" . . . Finally we are left in
    peace to go back to our mathematics, with the
    feeling each mathematician has that he is working
    on something real. (Dieudonné in Davis and Hersh,
    1981, p. 321)

4
  • Davis and Hersh, also, describe mathematician as
  • the typical mathematician is a realist on
    weekdays and a formalist on Sundays. That is,
    when he is doing mathematics he is convinced that
    he is dealing with an objective reality . . . But
    then, when challenged to give a philosophical
    account of this reality, he finds it easiest to
    pretend that he does not believe in it after all.
    (Davis and Hersh, 1981, p.321)

5
  • As Coffa notes,
  • the semantic tradition consisted of those who
    believed in the a priori but not in the
    constitutive powers of the mind . . . the root of
    all idealist confusion lay in misunderstandings
    concerning matters of meaning. Semanticists are
    easily detected They devote an uncommon amount
    of attention to concepts, propositions, and
    senses . . . (Coffa, 1991, p.1)

6
All these authors were questioning
  • about what objects mentioned in mathematical
    statements exist,
  • about what mathematical statements we can know,
  • about what mathematical statements are true or
    false.

7
mathematical practice and philosophical
theorizing
  • Stewart responds to the concern
  • philosophy-first
  • the principles of mathematics receive their
    authority, if any, from philosophy. Because we
    need a philosophical account of what mathematics
    is about only then can we determine what
    qualifies as correct mathematical reasoning.

8
philosophy-last
  • holds that mathematics is an autonomous science
    that doesnt need to borrow its authority from
    other disciplines.
  • On this view, philosophers have no right to
    legislate mathematical practice but must always
    accept mathematicians own judgment.

9
What Place Does Philosophy Have in Teaching
Mathematics?
10
What is Mathematics? B. Russell
  • Mathematics may be defined as the subject in
    which we never know what we are talking about,
    nor whether what we are saying is true.
  • Bertrand Russell, Mysticism and Logic (1917) ch.
    4

11
What is Philosophy of Mathematics?
  • Ontology for Mathematics Being
  • Ontology studies the nature of the objects of
    mathematics.
  • It is the claim that mathematical objects exist
    independently of their linguistic expression.
  • What we are talking about.
  • What is a number?
  • What is a point? line?
  • What is a set?
  • In what sense do these objects exist?

12
What is Philosophy of Mathematics?
  • Epistemology for Mathematics Knowing
  • Epistemology studies the acquisition of knowledge
    of the truth of a mathematical statement.
    whether what we are saying is true.
  • Does knowledge come from experience and evidence?
  • Does knowledge come from argument and proof?
  • Is knowledge relative or absolute?

13
Platonism
  • Platonism is one of the main theories in the
    philosophy of mathematics, and is one the major
    explanations of what mathematics really is. 
  • The question it attempts to answer is whether
    mathematical truth has an independent existence
    do
  • mathematicians discover mathematical truths that
    are, in some sense, out there to be found, or do
    they invent or create them?
  • The answer to this question will determine the
    very way in which mathematician will look at his
    or her subject, and it is also part of the
    question of whether mathematics is a science or
    an art, or even possibly a game.
  • The Platonist position, based (as the name
    implies) on ideas in the works of Plato, is that
    mathematical truth is discovered.  The idea is
    that mathematics consists of absolute truths,
    which were a prior (needing no other foundation,
    but being inescapable consequences of logical
    deduction).
  • This position was reiterated by Kant in the 18th
    century, particularly with respect to Euclidean
    geometry.

14
What is Philosophy of Mathematics?
  • According to Plato, knowledge is a subset of that
    which is both true and believed

15
What is Philosophy of Mathematics?
  • Formalism / Deductivism-
  • is a school of thought that all work in
    mathematics should be reduced to manipulations of
    sentences of symbolic logic, using standard
    rules. 
  • It was the logical outcome of the 19th-century
    search for greater rigor in mathematics. 
    Programmes were established to reduce the whole
    of known mathematics to set theory (which seemed
    to be among the most generally useful branches of
    the science). 
  • First attempts to do this included those of
    Bertrand Russell and A.N. Whitehead in Principia
    Mathematica (1910), and the later Hilbert
    Programme.

16
Semantic
  • is a discipline concerned with inquiry into the
    meaning of symbols, and especially linguistic
    meaning.
  • Semantics in this sense is often contrasted with
    syntax,
  • which deals with structures, and pragmatics,
  • which deals with the use of symbols in their
    relation to speakers, listeners and social
    context.

17
Roles for Philosophy in Teaching and Learning
  • For the Teacher/Mentor (T/M)
  • Awareness of issues can alert the T/M to
    excessively authoritarian approaches.
  • Alternative philosophical views can allow the T/M
    to use and/or develop alternatives to traditional
    approaches.
  • Philosophical issues can illuminate the value of
    and need for developing a variety of mathematical
    tools for solving problems.

18
Roles for Philosophy in Teaching and Learning
  • For the Student/Learner (S/L)
  • Helps the S/L understand the context, goals, and
    objectives of the mathematics being studied.
  • Opens the S/L to considerations of the human
    values and assumptions made in developing and
    using mathematics.
  • Alerts the S/L to the use of authority and the
    value of different approaches to mathematics.

19
Exploring Examples
  • Following are few examples of topics that can be
    used to introduce and explore some philosophical
    issues in mathematic subjects at a variety of
    levels.
  • Consider how these examples can be expanded or
    transformed to other aspects of the philosophy of
    mathematics.
  • Consider how these examples can be expanded or
    transformed to other mathematics topics and/or
    courses.

20
The Square Root of Two
  • Questions for Open Discussion
  • Ontological
  • Definition?
  • Does it exist?
  • What is the nature of this object?
  • Epistemological
  • How do we know it exists?
  • How do we know it is between 1 and 2
  • How do we know it is not a rational number?

21
Squares, Diagonals, and Square Roots
  • Learning Objectives
  •   Students will
  • Measure the sides and diagonals of squares.
  • Make predictions about, and explore the
    relationship between, side lengths and diagonals.
  • Formulate a rule for finding the length of a
    diagonal based on the side length.

22
Teacher Reflection
  • As the students were measuring the sides and
    diagonals of their squares, what did you observe
    about accuracy and precision? If students had
    trouble measuring their shapes, what can you do
    in the future to improve this skill?
  • What alternative patterns or methods did students
    discover that you did not anticipate? If the
    students did not discover alternate patterns, do
    you think there are any? Could you have led the
    students in another direction?
  • How did the students demonstrate understanding of
    the materials presented?
  • Were concepts presented too abstractly? Too
    concretely? How will you change the lesson if you
    teach it in the future?

23
2005 Curriculum Expectations
  • Grade 6-8
  • Measurement
  • Select and apply techniques and tools to
    accurately find length, area, volume, and angle
    measures to appropriate levels of precision.
  • Understand, select, and use units of appropriate
    size and type to measure angles, perimeter, area,
    surface area, and volume.

24
2005 Curriculum Expectations
  • Grade 6-8
  • Geometry
  • Understand relationships among the angles, side
    lengths, perimeters, areas, and volumes of
    similar objects.
  • Use geometric models to represent and explain
    numerical and algebraic relationships.

25
The EndThank you?
  • Questions?
  • Comments?
  • Discussion?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com