Dr. Matthew Ikl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr. Matthew Ikl

Description:

A Pragmatic Approach to Calculating 'Weight of Evidence' ... 100 gerbils of unknown color; 10 gerbils of known color, 5 of which are blue; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Owne522
Learn more at: http://www.agiri.org
Category:
Tags: gerbil | ikl | matthew

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr. Matthew Ikl


1
Imprecise Probabilities and Their Role in General
Intelligence A Pragmatic Approach to Calculating
Weight of Evidence Combining Imprecise
Probabilities and Confidence Intervals
Dr. Matthew Iklé Department of Mathematics and
Computer Science Adams State College
2
Probability Theory
  • A Principled Foundation for Artificial General
    Intelligence
  • BUT Constraints are placed by
  • The need to operate within realistic
    computational resources.
  • The current, incomplete state of probabilistic
    mathematics.
  • THUS Probability theory requires augmentation
    with heuristic approaches to be pragmatic for
    general intelligence.

3
Probabilistic Logic Networks (PLN)
  • A Logical Inference System
  • Combines rigorous probabilistic formulas with
    heuristic rules.
  • Reasoning based on uncertain knowledge and/or
    reasoning leading to uncertain conclusions.
  • Ability to encompass within logic things such as
    induction, abduction, analogy and speculation,
    and reasoning about time and causality.
  • Effectively propagates uncertainties through
    complex inferences involving quantifiers,
    higher-order functions, etc.
  • Designed for integration with a general-purpose
    cognition process (in the Novamente AI system)

4
Probabilistic Logic Networks (PLN)
  • A Rich Set of Inference Rules
  • Deduction, Bayes Rule, Unification,
    Intensional/Extensional Inference, Belief
    Revision,
  • Each rule comes with uncertain truth value
    formulas, calculating the truth value of the
    conclusion from the truth values of the premises
  • Inference is controlled by highly flexible
    forward and backward chaining processes able to
    take feedback from external processes and thus
    behave adaptively

5
Belief Revision
  • One simple, but critical rule within PLN and
    other uncertain inference systems
  • Allows the combination of two different estimates
    of the truth value of the same proposition, to
    form a composite estimate
  • Is awkwardly handled within standard
    probabilistic approaches
  • Different estimates may come from different
    external sources, OR from different internal
    inference trails

6
Belief Revision A Heuristic Rule
  • lts,dgt -- ltstrength, weight of evidencegt
  • count n k d/(1-d) d n/(nk), assume k10
  • eat (cat, mouse) lt.8,.7gt // data source 1
  • eat(cat, mouse) lt.2,.4gt // data source 2
  • -
  • eat(cat, mouse) lt.58, .75gt // sources 1 and 2
  • (.8 .7 .2.4)/(.7.4) .58
  • d1.7 --gt N1 23
  • d2.4 --gt N2 7
  • N N1 N2 30 (assuming no dependence)
  • d .75

7
Weight of Evidence
  • What is it?
  • Why is it important?
  • E.g. belief revision
  • One approach weight of ev. interval width
  • .2,.8 means less evidence than .4,.6
  • Pei Wangs NARS system
  • Imprecise probabilities
  • Heuristic approaches (Izabela Freire Goertzel)

8
Imprecise Probabilities
  • The foundation of one approach to weight of
    evidence calculations within PLN
  • Peter Walleys Imprecise Beta-Binomial (IBB)
    theory, developed in his seminal work,
    Statistical Inference with Imprecise
    Probabilities, 1991.
  • Uses a parametrized envelope of
    (Beta-disribution) priors rather than assuming a
    single prior.

9
Imprecise Probabilities
  • Advantages of Imprecise Probabilities in General
  • Weakness of the traditional approach to
    statistics with its reliance on often unmotivated
    assumptions regarding the functional forms of
    probability distributions.
  • More natural and consistent with uncertain and
    incomplete information.
  • Standard Bayesian methods offer no generally
    viable way to assess or reason about
    second-order uncertainties or
    weight-of-evidence (eloquently pointed out by
    Pei Wang).

10
Imprecise Probabilities are not (quite) the
entire answer
  • Disadvantages of Imprecise Probabilities
  • Overly conservative.
  • Professing ignorance rather than giving guidance
    for practical decision-making.
  • Even with significant information to the
    contrary, imprecise probability intervals rapidly
    expand to 0,1.

11
The PLN Approach
  • A Hybrid of Imprecise Probabilities and
    Traditional Confidence Intervals
  • Walleys key ideas provide a solid foundation.
  • Natural generalization of Walleys parametrized
    distributions.
  • All distributions replaced by envelopes of
    distributions.

12
Three Basic Stages
  • To calculate the weight of evidence associated
    with the conclusion of an uncertain inference
    rule (e.g. deduction, Bayes rule,)
  • Translate premise strength (probability) values
    s, count (weight-of-evidence) values n, and
    standard confidence levels b, into initial
    intervals L,U.
  • Calculate final L,U interval using the
    inference rule and Monte-Carlo methods (see next
    slide)
  • Translate final L,U interval back to get final
    strength, count, and confidence level values.

13
Monte-Carlo methods
final probability interval
initial probability interval
Imprecise Probability level
Translation layer
strength, count, confidence level
strength, count, confidence level
AI engine level
14
An Example
  • Suppose we have
  • 100 gerbils of unknown color
  • 10 gerbils of known color, 5 of which are blue
  • and 100 rats of known color, 10 of which are
    blue.
  • We wish to estimate the probability of a randomly
    chosen blue rodent being a gerbil, using Bayes
    rule
  • P(gerbil blue) ?

15
Experimental Results
PLN Approach
16
Experimental Results
Bayesian (Standard Confidence Interval) Approach
Walleys Approach
17
The PLN Approach
  • Advantages of the PLN Hybrid Method
  • Introduction of traditional Bayesian confidence
    intervals at each stage provides an easily
    configurable way to control the expansion of the
    probability intervals.
  • Both Walleys IBB theory and standard Bayesian
    inference follow from the PLN approach as special
    cases.
  • Allows for the modeling of all probabilities by
    any family of distributions.
  • Allows for considerably more flexibility in
    accounting for known and unknown quantities.

18
Conclusions
  • The PLN Hybrid Method
  • Combines the solid philosophical underpinnings of
    imprecise probability theory with the
    practicality of standard Bayesian methods.
  • Provides the ability to adjust interval widths
    based on confidence levels.
  • Interoperates smoothly with non-probabilistic
    heuristic methods.

19
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com