11 September 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

11 September 2006

Description:

(Finch, 1998, p. 139) Signification relationships. inside the language; Reference relationships ... Finch, G. (1998). How to study linguistics. London: Macmillan. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: HKI97
Category:
Tags: finch | september

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 11 September 2006


1

LING 2003 Semantics Lecture 1 INTRODUCTION TO
SEMANTICS
  • 11 September 2006
  • By Dr. Olga Zayts
  • zayts_at_hkucc.hku.hk

2
Lecture overview
  • Course description assessment.
  • Definition of semantics and the scope of
    semantics minimum meaningful units.
  • Linguistic and non-linguistic approaches to the
    study of meaning. Origin of semantics.
  • Pragmatics distinguished from semantics.
  • Introduction of some semantic terminology
    utterances, sentences and propositions literal
    and non-literal meaning.

3
Definition of semantics
  • Semantics is generally defined as the study of
    meaning (see, for example, Lyons, 1977 1
    Hurford, Heasley, 1983 1)
  • Saeed (2003 3) Semantics is the study of the
    meaning of words and sentences.
  • Griffith (2006 1) Semantics is the study of
    the toolkit for meaning knowledge encoded in
    the vocabulary of the language and in its
    patterns for building more elaborate meanings, up
    to the level of sentence meaning. (my emphasis)

4
Scope of semantics
  • Linguistics involves different levels of
    analysis
  • phonemes (phonology)
  • morphemes (morphology)
  • words
  • Phrases (syntax)
  • Sentences (syntax)

semantics
5
Linguistic meaning phonemes and morphemes?
  • Traditionally the first two levels of analysis
    are dismissed in semantics as words are
    considered to be the minimal meaningful units.
  • Some linguists talk about phonetic meaning (e.g.
    linguists from the St. Petersburg State
    University (Prof. Voronin) are insisting on the
    necessity of separating a linguistic discipline
    phonosemantics).

6
Linguistic meaning morphological level
  • Onomatopoeia lexical items that imitate the
    sounds they represent. In English they can be
    grouped on the basis of initial consonants,
    vowels or final consonants (CEL, 1997 176)
  • Examples
  • /sl-/ slime, slither, slug, sloppy
  • Words beginning with /sl-/ are said to convey
    unpleasant associations.
  • Slime thick, soft, slippery liquid, esp. mud
    (OALD, 1993 1199).
  • Slither slide or slip unsteadily (OALD, 1993
    1200).
  • Slug small creature like a snail without a
    shell that moves slowly and lives a slimy trail
    (OALD, 1993 1202).
  • Sloppy 1) careless and untidy in dress 2) done
    in a careless and untidy way 3) covered with
    spilled water (OALD, 1993 1201).

7
Linguistic meaning phonemes and morphemes?
  • Some elements of meaning can be also found on the
    morphological level
  • Paronyms words, which are derived from the same
    root. These words have associated meanings and
    are very similar in form. (Adj paronymous,
    paronymic).
  • A lot of mistakes in speech and writing are due
    to mixing up paronyms. Check dictionaries of
    easily confused words dictionaries of common
    errors, dictionaries of tricky words.
  • Examples
  • Proscribe/prescribe Latin root scribere,
    scriptus (to write) different prefixes pro-
    pre-.
  • Proscribe state officially that something is
    dangerous or forbidden The sale of narcotics is
    proscribed by law (OALD, 1993 1002).
  • Prescribe advise or order the use of something
    (especially a medicine, remedy, etc.) The doctor
    prescribed some pills to help me to sleep (OALD,
    1993 979).
  • Affect/effect Latin root facere (to make, to
    place) different morphemes af- ef.
  • Affect have an influence produce an affect on
    somebody/something The change in climate may
    affect your health (OALD, 1993 19).
  • Effect bring something about cause to occur
    effect a cure a change a sale (OALD, 1993 386)

8
Minimal meaningful unit
  • We can speak about certain meanings on the
    phonological and morphological level
  • The minimal meaningful unit is a word. In our
    course we will also consider the syntactic level
    (the meaning of phrases and sentences)

9
Non-linguistic approaches to the study of meaning
  • The study of meaning is a concern of various
    academic disciplines (Cruse, 2000 10 11)
  • Philosophy
  • Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Sociology
  • Anthropology, etc.
  • There is a certain degree of overlapping in the
    study of meaning by various disciplines, but they
    all have some idiosyncratic (unique) features.

10
Origin of semantics
  • We attribute the term semantics to philosopher
    Charles Morris
  • He was concerned with study of the science of
    signs (semiotic).
  • Morris distinguished 3 branches of semiotics
  • Syntactics (or syntax), which studies the formal
    relation among different signs
  • Semantics, the study of the relation between the
    signs and the objects they denote
  • Pragmatics, the study of the relation of signs to
    their interpreters, i.e. people.

11
Signs
  • Syntactics, semantics, pragmatics are all
    concerned with the study of signs
  • Three different types of signs a sign can
    resemble the object (icon), it can point to or be
    attached to the object (index), or it can be only
    arbitrary or conventionally associated with the
    object (symbol).

12
Signs
Written language ? ? ? ? F J U
13
Signs
  • Words are examples of verbal symbols.
  • Language represents mans most sophisticated use
    of signs (Saeed, 2003 5).

14
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • From the linguistic viewpoint there are three
    major interpretations of meaning (Lepschy, 1970
    38 39)
  • Language is seen as a two-plane system consisting
    of the relationship between form and meaning
    (expression and content). According to this view
    meaning can be described either independently or
    in necessary connection with the expression, but
    in any case as an autonomous entity. This is the
    most traditional view of the language, and the
    linguists that we can name here are Ferdinand de
    Saussure and Hjelmslev.

15
SIGN TREE
Signification ? relationships inside the
language Reference ? relationships between
language the world
treeness Mental Image Sense
Signified
Reference
Signification
Physical object
Referent
/tri/ Sound Image Physical form
Signifier
(Finch, 1998, p. 139)
16
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Saussures idea that words in a language are
    referentially linked to other words in a language
    (Saeed, 2003 12). The meaning of the word is
    defined by what it can be used to refer to and
    from its relationship to other words.
  • Example Eng. sheep mutton Fr. mouton

signified
signified
signified
signifier
signifier
signifier
17
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • This interpretation of meaning includes
    componential analysis of meaning, i.e. when
    researchers identify an inventory of semantic
    features, which serve as components of an
    unlimited number of meanings

18
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Examples
  • My friend studies linguistics at HKU.
  • My cat studies linguistics at HKU.

19
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Meaning is seen as the relationship
    (correspondence or lack of correspondence)
    between language and reality, between the
    utterance and the state of affairs it refers to.
    This viewpoint has been mainly adopted in the
    formal (logical) semantics.

20
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Example
  • The house is on fire.
  • The fire brigade are on the way.
  • The house is on fire and the fire brigade are on
    the way.
  • If both sentences a and b are true, then the
    compound c is also true. This relationship can be
    represented in logical semantic in the following
    way
  • p q pq
  • T T T
  • T F F
  • F T F
  • F F F
  • (pq means p and q)

21
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Meaning is the way signs are used. This
    understanding of meaning is connected with the
    previous one, as it sees meaning as the relation
    between signs and reality both linguistically
    (linguistic context) and non-linguistically (the
    context of situation).
  • This view has been widely supported. But it
    contains some challenges
  • Example
  • Chinese teacher loves her job very much.

22
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • Dealing with challenges distinguish between
    word/sentence meaning and speakers meaning. This
    approach suggests that words/sentences have a
    certain meaning independent of their usage.
  • The first type of meaning is the domain of
    semantics and second type of meaning is the
    domain of pragmatics. It is sometimes very
    difficult to draw a line between the semantic and
    pragmatic meanings.
  • The complementary relation between the two was
    very well illustrated by Geoffrey Leech

23
Linguistic interpretation of meaning
  • The complementary relation between pragmatics and
    semantics was very well illustrated by Geoffrey
    Leech

Semantics
Pragmatics
24
Pragmatics distinguished form semantics
  • (Idea from Griffith, 2006 3)

25
Utterances, sentences, propositions
  • Excellent!
  • Delicious!
  • Your food is delicious! Sentence an abstract
    linguistic object on which an utterance is based.

Utterances raw data of linguistics (Griffith,
2006)
26
Utterances, sentences, propositions
  • Propositions core sentence meaning, the
    abstract idea that remains the same in cases such
    as
  • Examples
  • Sharks hunt seals.
  • Seals are hunted by sharks.
  • Seals are preys to sharks.

27
Utterances, sentences, propositions
  • What is studied by pragmatics, semantics?
  • utterances
  • sentences
  • propositions

28
Literal and non-literal meaning
  • Literal neutral, factual way of talking (Saeed,
    2003 15)
  • Non-literal (figurative) metaphor, irony,
    hyperbole, etc.

29
References
  • Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language. New
    York Oxford University Press. (pp. 1 16).
  • Finch, G. (1998). How to study linguistics.
    London Macmillan.
  • Griffith, P. (2006), An introduction to English
    semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh Edinburgh
    University Press.
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics.
    London, N. Y. Longman. (p. 1 45).
  • Lepschy, G. C. (1970). A survey of structural
    linguistics. London Faber and Faber. (pp. 38
    39).
  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. (Vol. 1). Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press. (pp. 1 5).
  • your textbook Saeed, part I, ch. 1.

30
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com