Blazars: VLBA and GLAST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Blazars: VLBA and GLAST

Description:

VLBA Observations of EGRET Blazars. Why were some strong radio quasars detected by EGRET while others like 3C345 were not? ... EGRET VLBA observations (1994-1997) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: whi82
Learn more at: http://www.aoc.nrao.edu
Category:
Tags: glast | vlba | blazars | egret

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Blazars: VLBA and GLAST


1
Blazars VLBA and GLAST
  • Glenn Piner
  • Whittier College

2
Overview
  • Review of EGRET and current TeV observations.
  • VLBA observations of EGRET and TeV blazars.
  • Future ?-ray telescopes (AGILE, GLAST, VERITAS)
    and predictions of source detections.
  • VLBA Observations of GLAST sources.

3
Two Main Types of Blazars
  • Red Blazars (3C279) More luminous, X-rays are
    inverse-Compton, inverse-Compton peaks at GeV
    energies, studied with space-based pair
    production telescopes.
  • Blue Blazars (Mrk 501) Less luminous, X-rays are
    synchrotron, inverse-Compton peaks at TeV
    energies, studied with ground-based Cerenkov
    light telescopes.

4
EGRET Blazar Detections
  • EGRET detected 93 blazars, 66 with high
    confidence (3rd EGRET catalog).
  • Apparent ?-ray luminosity as much as 100 times
    greater than that at all other wavelengths for
    some flaring blazars.
  • Rapid time variability provided important
    evidence for relativistic beaming from
    compactness arguments (even more true for the TeV
    blazars, limit ? gt 10 obtained for Mrk 421).

5
VLBA Observations of EGRET Blazars
  • Why were some strong radio quasars detected by
    EGRET while others like 3C345 were not? Are there
    ?-ray loud, ?-ray quiet blazars?
  • VLBA monitoring of EGRET blazars by Jorstad et
    al. (2001a) showed EGRET blazars had faster
    apparent speeds than sources in radio selected
    samples, and are therefore more strongly beamed.


6
VLBA Observations of EGRET Blazars
  • This is expected from ?-ray emission models. Both
    SSC and EC models predict a stronger dependence
    of ?-ray emission on ? than for the radio
    emission.
  • GLAST should fill in missing bright flat-spectrum
    radio sources like 3C345.

7
VLBA Observations of EGRET Blazars
  • VLBA observations have also apparently directly
    imaged the ?-ray producing regions.
  • Jorstad et al. (2001b) find that 50 of EGRET
    flares are correlated with the ejection of a new
    superluminal component with an average time delay
    of 52 days between the epoch of zero-separation
    and the flare.
  • Suggests these gamma-ray flares are occurring in
    the superluminal radio knots several parsecs
    downstream of the radio core.

8
Improvements in VLBI Science by Time of GLAST
  • EGRET VLBA observations (1994-1997).
  • More sophisticated understanding of the nature of
    components from numerical simulations, e.g.
    Agudo et al. 2001 (stationary components, pattern
    speed, bulk speed).
  • Large multi-epoch surveys (2 cm survey).
  • Routine VLBI Polarimetry.
  • Routine Imaging at 86 GHz, possibly inside
    current radio core.

9
TeV Blazars
  • Confirmed Sources
  • Markarian 421 (z0.03) (15 4 epochs)
  • Markarian 501 (z0.03) (12 epochs)
  • 1426428 (z0.13) (4 epochs)
  • 1959650 (z0.05) (3 3 epochs)
  • Unconfirmed Sources
  • 2155-304 (z0.12) (3 1 epoch)
  • 2344514 (z0.04) (4 epochs)
  • BL Lac (z0.07)
  • 3C66A (z0.44) (doubtful because of high z)
  • M87 (z0.004) (not a blazar)

10
VLBA Observations of TeV Blazars
  • The jets of TeV blazars appear much the same from
    epoch to epoch, with little or no component
    motion.
  • The components may just be stationary patterns,
    but where are the moving shocks presumably
    responsible for ?-ray flares?

11
Observations of Mrk 421 after 2001 TeV flares
show swing in EVPA of C7, similar to behavior
seen by Homan et al. (2002) in four other sources.
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
AGILE
  • Energy Range 30 MeV - 50 GeV.
  • Source Location Determination 5-20 (about
    twice as good as EGRET).
  • Sensitivity comparable to EGRET on-axis, better
    than EGRET for off-axis sources.
  • FOV 3 sr, about six times EGRETs, yielding
    sensitivities for a 1-year all sky survey 3 times
    better than EGRET.
  • Launch 2004.
  • Blazar Detection 200-300 blazars.

16
GLAST Large Area Telescope (LAT)
  • Energy Range 20 MeV - 300 GeV.
  • Source Location Determination 1-10 (fainter
    sources), lt0.5 (brightest sources) (30 times
    better than EGRET).
  • FOV gt 2 sr, about four times EGRET FOV.
  • Launch 2006-2007.
  • Sensitivity For a 1-year all sky survey, GLAST
    will reach a flux limit about 30 times fainter
    than EGRET.
  • Source Detection estimates range from
    3,000-11,000 sources detected after 1 year.
  • Will operate in all-sky scanning mode for first
    year.

17
LAT Improvements to EGRET Blazar Science
  • Do blazars have a quiescent flux level, and what
    is the duty cycle for flaring?
  • Densely sampled light curves, allowing
    discrimination among flaring models.
  • Spectral index evolution during flare (Hard lags
    or soft lags?).

18
LAT Rate of Flare Detection
  • Dermer Dingus (2002) calculate rate of
    detection of bright ?-ray flares.
  • Bright flare defined as flux gt 2 x 10-6 ph cm-2
    s-1 (gt 100 MeV), (about flux of 1991 3C279
    flare).
  • Detection of a flare at this level, which may
    have triggered an EGRET multiwavelength Target of
    Opportunity, should occur once every 3-4 days.

19
LAT Detection of Faint Sources
20
What will these sources be like in radio?
  • Mattox et al. 1997 showed definitively that EGRET
    detections are correlated with flat-spectrum (? gt
    -0.5) radio sources above about 1 Jy (Kuhr
    catalog).
  • Correlation between peak ?-ray flux and 5 GHz
    radio flux with 99.998 confidence.
  • Since GLAST is 30 times more sensitive, we might
    expect GLAST sources to be correlated with
    flat-spectrum radio sources above about 30 mJy.
  • GLAST may also detect non-blazars radio
    galaxies, Seyfert galaxies, LINERs, radio-quiet
    quasars (All have compact VLBI flux at the mJy
    level).

21
(No Transcript)
22
Flat-spectrum sources over 30 mJy
  • CLASS complete sample (Myers et al. 2003) is a
    complete sample of flat-spectrum sources (? gt
    -0.5 between NVSS and GB6) over 30 mJy (in GB6
    catalog).
  • The sample contains 11,685 sources between
    between 0olt?lt75o, and excluding the galactic
    plane.
  • Observed with the VLA in A configuration at 8.4
    GHz from 1994-1999.
  • 10,906 of 11,685 sources detected.
  • CLASS complete sample can be considered as the
    GLAST candidate list for the northern hemisphere.
  • About one CLASS source per square degree, GLAST
    error circle 0.02 square degrees, will be source
    confusion for a few percent of GLAST sources.

23
(No Transcript)
24
VLBA Observations of CLASS sources
  • VLBA Imaging and Polarimetry survey (VIPS)
  • PI Chris Fassnacht, UC Davis
  • Selection criteria
  • Above 50 mJy in CLASS
  • In region of sky covered by Sloan Digital Sky
    Survey (redshifts).
  • Yields approximately 1,000 sources.
  • Survey to image these sources with dual
    polarization observations at 5 and 15 GHz, 1.5
    hours total per source.
  • 500 hours of observing time per year for three
    years.
  • Test proposal approved for 48 hours of
    observing time, full proposal not yet submitted.

25
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Jim Ulvestad and Seth Digel for
supplying some material used in this talk.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com