GIS for Economic Development

1
GIS for Economic Development
Steve Kelley Senior Economist Ohio Department of
Development
2
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Parcel
Integration Site Selection Proof-of-Concept
3
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Parcel
Integration Site Selection Proof-of-Concept
4
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Parcel
Integration Site Selection Proof-of-Concept
To demonstrate the value and capability of
existing spatial data to support site
selection To provide the information necessary
to gain executive support for continued
development of a site search and selection
solution. The proof of concept focused on
relevant and readily accessible data and
encompassing Crawford and Licking counties
5
SITE SELECTION DATA LAYERS
22. PARCELS (3) 23. COUNTY 24. MUNICIPALITY 25.
FEMA (2) 26. HYDROGRAPHY (6) 27. ODE SCHOOL
DISTRICT BOUNDARY 07 28. CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS
(5) 29. OSIP (3) 30. TOWNSHIP 31. INCENTIVE ZONES
(1) 32. ZONING (3) 33. WORKFORCE / TALENT
REGIONS 34. FEDERAL LANDS 35. PUCO (6) 36. SSURGO
SOILS (2) 37. TAXATION (5) 38. NREL RENEWABLE
ENERGY (5) 39. AIRQUAL NON-ATT 05 40. LEGISLATIVE
DIST (2) 41. E_PROCURE (3) 42. ODOT STATE BOUNDARY
1. E_PROCURE OH SITE 2. XCELIGENT (2) 3.
CRA_SITES 4. BAJA MARINE SITE 5. CLEAN OHIO SITES
(2) 6. FCC TOWERS (7) 7. FACILITIES (8) 8.
UTILITIES (4) 9. Licking (12) 10.
Hebron-Utilities (5) 11. New Albany Sanitary
(5) 12. New Albany Water (5) 13. BUC Util (4) 14.
TRANSPORTATION (6) 15. LBRS (40) 16. LICKING
CENTERLINE 17. State Routes 18. Interstate 19.
Active Rail 20. Abandoned Rail 21. EXISTING
BUSINESSES (4)
6
BASEMAP FEATURES
OIT/GISSC 2008
7
TRANSMISSION LINES
RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL
8
ELECTRIC SERVICE AREAS
OIT/GISSC 2008
9
TELCOS
10
DOD ENTERPRISE ZONES
11
CLEAN OHIO SITES
OIT/GISSC 2008
12
Pilot Counties Crawford / Licking
13
LICKING COUNTY
GROUNDWATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL
14
LICKING COUNTY
LOCAL ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS
15
LICKING COUNTY
SSURGO SOILS SURVEYS
16
LICKING COUNTY
CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS
17
LICKING COUNTY
EDUCATION LEVEL ATTAINED
18
LICKING COUNTY
JOBS BY INDUSTRY
19
CRAWFORD COUNTY
SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
20
INTEGRATING CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS
PCT STUDENTS IN FREE LUNCH PROGRAM by SCHOOL
DISTRICT - 1999
21
INTEGRATING CENSUS DEMOGRAPHICS
PCT STUDENTS IN FREE LUNCH PROGRAM by SCHOOL
DISTRICT - 2006
22
ANALYZING DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
PCT POINT INCREASE IN FREE LUNCH PROGRAM 1999-2006
23
LICKING COUNTY
FACILTIES / TOWERS / BRIDGES
24
LICKING COUNTY
AVAILABLE SITE INFORMATION
25
CRAWFORD COUNTY
AREA BUSINESS DATA
26
CRAWFORD COUNTY
FLOODPLAIN AND WETLANDS INVENTORY
27
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LOCAL PARCEL INFORMATION
28
CRAWFORD COUNTY
STATEWIDE IMAGERY
29
CRAWFORD COUNTY
LOCAL UTILITY DATA
30
CRAWFORD COUNTY
COMPLETE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION
31
CRAWFORD COUNTY
ENTERPRISE ZONES
32
CRAWFORD COUNTY
EXTENT OF AVAILABLE PROPERTY
33
SITE SELECTION CAPABILTIES
34
SITE SELECTION CRITERIA
35
SITE SELECTION REFINEMENTS
36
SUITABLE SITE SELECTION
37
CRAWFORD COUNTY
38
DETAILED SITE SELECTION REPORTS
39
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
Lessons Learned
Local Economic Development Directors see value in
the large amount of state and local data that can
be leveraged to support the site selection
process While some data sets are relatively
static, others like parcels are extremely dynamic
requiring data sharing and maintenance agreements
to assure ready access Local Economic
Development Directors recognize parcel data
maintained at the county level is valuable at
higher levels of government and across government
agencies. Directors expressed interest in
obtaining access to site selection and reporting
tools indicating they would be willing to augment
and maintain information using a web-based
application All Local Development Departments
are not created equally, current capabilities and
resources would be enhanced by access to
web-based site selection tools
40
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
Lessons Learned
Level of accuracy and completeness of spatial
data varies from county to county and must be
considered when building functionality An effort
should be made to identify gaps in available
Zoning data layers to determine a viable solution
to support the site selection process. Additional
effort should be made to investigate the merits
and level of effort required for the integration
of commercial real estate databases
41
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
Next Steps
Identify Key Stakeholders Identify potential
funding mechanisms Initiate a Parcel Data
Integration and GIS Repository Identify
infrastructure and services to support
application development Craft data sharing and
maintenance agreements Establish bi-directional
data sharing processes
42
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
43
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
44
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
45
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
46
SITE SELECTION PROOF-OF-CONCEPT
47
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Purpose
Gather together disparate county parcel based
data sets in a centralized repository for
increased analysis, more informed decision making
and support to numerous state agency functions
Create a comprehensive approach that develops a
consistent and coordinated statewide parcel
coverage for Ohio for analytical purposes
Leverage state, local, and federal government
data along with GIS technology to create a level
playing field for County Economic Development
activities Provide a solid foundation for
emergency response, emergency management and
mitigation, E-911 initiatives, public safety,
and homeland security activities
48
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Challenges
A centralized repository for parcel data with
defined automated maintenance processes does not
exist. Each time a statewide function is
identified that requires parcel level data,
months of communication and coordination are
required to gather the necessary spatial data,
and manipulate and modify the spatial data to
ensure its applicability to the states function.
Due to the high amount of overhead and staff
time required to accomplish this, the last time
this data was gathered on a statewide basis by
OGRIP was in 2005. Formats vary by the countys
spatial software or Computer Assisted Mass
Appraisal (CAMA) Systems or both.
49
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Key Stakeholders
Department of Administrative Services Department
of Job and Family Services Department of Public
Safety Department of Environmental
Protection Department of Natural Resources
County Auditors County Engineers Department of
Development Treasurer of State Department of
Taxation Department of Transportation .
50
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Funding Opportunities
Department of Development Treasurer of
State Department of Taxation Department of
Transportation Department of Administrative
Services Department of Public Safety Public
Utilities Commission
51
ENTERPRISE GIS DATA REPOSITORY
HTTP/FTP
STATEWIDE PARCEL PROGRAM
METADATA
MASTER ADDRESS FILE
DISTRIBUTION
DATA CREATORS/STEWARDS
ODA
LOCATION BASED RESPONSE SYSTEM
TOS
APPS
STATEWIDE IMAGERY PROGRAM
MAP SERVICES
52
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Pilot Purpose
Develop partnerships with local government
authorities (County Auditors, Engineers)
responsible for the collection, management and
maintenance of cadastral or parcel information.
Gather property ownership (parcel) boundaries
and property characteristics in a consistent
fashion to be used by state agencies and others.
Initiate a broader program for the development
of a consistent, statewide parcel coverage for
analysis purposes for Ohio. Develop negotiated
requirements with key stakeholders taking into
account functionality, scalability, performance,
operations and administrative aspects. The key
stakeholders will review and suggest any
modifications in preparation for broader
implementation.
53
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Pilot Outcomes

• Work with the key stakeholders to develop an
  Incremental Program Strategy to
• Identify Quick Wins
• Develop Implementation Plan
• Establish a Data Development Goals
• Determine Operational Responsibilities
• Establish Data Maintenance Requirements
• Establish Data Update Procedures
• Establish Program Costs

54
Ohio Parcel Data Integration and GIS Repository
Pilot
Ohio Parcel Integration Program Roles Department
of Development Serve as Program Sponsor Provide
Executive Support Drive Funding Efforts
OGRIP Leverage Local Government
Relationships Provide Infrastructure Build out
Repository
55
CENSUS BASED vs PARCEL BASED
SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY COMPARISON
56
VENDOR SUPPLIED CENSUS BASED vs PARCEL BASED
Columbus
New Albany
Plain Twp
Gahanna
Jefferson Twp
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY COMPARISON