Title: Strategy
1Strategy Politics in the King-Byng Crisis
- Sources
- Duffy, John. Fights of our lives elections,
leadership, and the making of Canada. (ON
RESERVE) - Neatby, William Lyon Mackenzie King, 1924-32 The
Lonely Heights, Ch. 7-9 - Graham, The King-Byng Affair A Question of
Responsible Government
2Outline
- A House Divided
- The King Governments Fate
- The Dissolution Crisis
- The Election of 1926
3A House Divided Background
- An indecisive election outcome
- The Election of 1925 (245 Seats)
4A House Divided Background
- Three choices
- Dissolution
- Meighen form government on basis of plurality
- King continues in office on basis of Progressive
support (Majority of 3)
5A House Divided Background
- Basis of Liberal Progressive Alliance
- Opposition to Torys tariff
- Old age pension plan
- Agriculture bill
- Natural resource transfer to Alberta
6A House Divided Background
- Problems on the Horizon
- Alberta resource transfer involves land bears
on separate school issue - Catholic-Protestant tensions inflamed in country
in caucus - Supreme Court has to rule delay causes tensions
with Progressives
7A House Divided Background
- Problems on the Horizon
- Customs scandal in Quebec
- Minister (Bureau) had been replaced
- New minister (Boivin) cleaning up department
- Parliamentary committee investigates
8The King Governments Fate
- 16 June 1925, sees presentation of report
- 4 Liberals, 4 Tories, 1 Progressive
- Liberals Case
- Minister (Bureau) had been replaced
- New minister (Boivin) cleaning up the dept.
- Boivin limited too much re-organization
admission of Bureaus complicity / laxity
9The King Governments Fate
- Aziz case
- Moses Aziz arrested of smuggling liquor
- Liberal NB MP asks Boivin to delay sentence
- Boivin admits he was wrong to do so
- Tories want censure of Boivin
10The King Governments Fate
- Government cant withstand censure
- Kennedy (Prog.) votes to defeat Tory committee
motion - Kennedy Boivins conduct unjustifiable not
censurable - motion also blames 3 Liberal 1 Tory MP for
asking such favours - Tory back down, but will amend final report in
House to include censure
11The King Governments Fate
- Internal Liberal caucus tensions
- The French Canadian Liberals were ready to
defend Bureau and Boivin even if it meant forcing
an election. They were rebellious in caucus next
morning. Much was said of not sacrificing Boivin
there was a damning of Progressives Kennedy
in particular -
- (Neatby, 1963, 135)
12The King Governments Fate
- King tries to calm / cow his MPs
- I gave caucus to understand that if we were
defeated in the House the Govr. General wd
probably not grant me a dissolutn, but wd call
on Meighen me to see that sufficient supply was
voted to enable him to form a govt. have an
election. I explained they wd have to agree to
vote supply. I also stated we had no funds
that the Tory party had mffrs. assocn at their
back. - (Neatby, 1963, 135)
13The King Governments Fate
- Tories try to amend committee report
- Stevens amendment
- Admin of Customs Dept. wholly indefensible
- Boivins conduct utterly unjustifiable
(Kennedys words) - Deplored (w/o naming MPs) practice of appealing
to Ministers
14The King Governments Fate
- J.S. Woodsworth speaks
- We cannot vote on this question absolutely on
its merits If the amendment carries, presumably
the Liberals go out of office and the
Conservatives come into office. - (Neatby 1963, 137)
15The King Governments Fate
- J.S. Woodsworth amendment
- No reference to Boivin
- Royal Commission
- Meighen challenges this as separate amendment to
main motion (why?) - Uproar adjournment
16The King Governments Fate
- Next day
- King Tories playing politics to grab power
- Meighen Government avoiding responsibility for
its Ministers conduct - Progressives divided
- Kennedy agrees with Woodsworths view, but cant
support it - 5 Progressive vote with Tories
- Woodsworth amendment fails 122 to 120
17The King Governments Fate
In the Left-Right policy dimension, the median
voter is a Liberal MP
116
101
24
2
Left
Right
18The King Governments Fate
Censure (Clean out) Government
On the Clean Govt dimension, the median voter
is a Progressive
Current (Dirty?) Government
Right
Left
19The King Governments Fate
- King wants new amendment watering down Govts
culpability - Wants Neill (Ind) to introduce it
- Fansher (Prog.) recognized
- Meighen convinced Fansher
- Use Stevens amendment criticism (utterly
indefensible) - Add Woodsworth enquiry
- Speaker Fansher amndt. out of order
20The King Governments Fate
- Speakers ruling overturned by 2 votes!
- King desperate for adjournment, but defeated by 1
vote - Cant have 2 consecutive adjournment motions
- Damaging Stevens amendment remains on table
- Recall that all thats happened is the House has
wrangled on if / how to amend Stevens amendment - Whats King to do?
21The King Governments Fate
- King accepts Fansher amendment while reserving
right to -
- to reject the amendment as amended, or to amend
the amendment as amended, as the rules of the
House may permit. - Quoted in (Graham, 1967, 3)
- House adjourns. Note Stevens amndt. still on the
table.
22King-Byng Crisis Summary
- King reliant on Progressive support
- Scandal erupts at Customs Department
- Battle over committees report to Parliament
- Kennedy Amendment unjustifiable not censurable
- Steven Amendment utterly unjustiable
- Woodsworth Amendment public enquiry
- Fansher Amendment Stevens wording enquiry
- Government secures adjournment only by agreeing
to Fansher amend. - Stevens Amendment still on the table
23The Dissolution Crisis
- King thinks he can still pass Neill amndt. but
starts to worry about Progressive support
optics - Better not take chance on Progs agreeing to
amendt passing, they might not do so then cndn
worse they might do so then wd not vote for
dissolution but to carry on - (Neatby, 144)
24The Dissolution Crisis
- King wanted dissolution from the start, noting of
the vote on adjournment that - I believed it to be the last vote I wd cast as
Prime Minister in this prlt my thought being we
should demand dissolutn and resign. - (Neatby, 144)
25The Dissolution Crisis
- Kings pleased to find his decision to seek
dissolution has snookered the Progs. - Meeting with Gardiner (Prog) Spencer (Prog)
- I did not say what I wd recommend to the Govr.
Genl. They clearly did not expect dissolution,
but Mr. Meighen following on in a manner which
wld avoid an electionthey dont want an election
will go with any every party to avoid it,
tho they are the party of principles
themselves these 2 men the best of them. - (Neatby, 145)
26The Dissolution Crisis
- King asks Byng for dissolution, 28 June 1926
- Byng refuses
- King suggests Byng cable Britain for advice!
Thats rich! - King always played on his great-grandfathers
role in the Rebellions fight for Responsible
Government - Byng refuses
- King tenders resignation, i.e., abandons office
27The Dissolution Crisis
- Byng asks Meighen to form government
- Meighen cannot refuse
- Yes plays into Kings hands
- No repudiates Byng validates Kings
resignation - Cabinet ministers must resign seats
28The Dissolution Crisis
- The Double Shuffle Revisited
- Meighen resigns to seek by-election
- Appoints six ministers w/o portfolio
- Privy Councillors
- Do not draw ministers salary
- Not administering departments technically
29The Dissolution Crisis
- King launches attack on two fronts
- The Threat to Responsible Government
- If at the instance of one individual a prime
minister can be put into office and with a
ministry which is not yet formed be permitted to
vote all the supplies necessary to carry on the
Government of Canada for a year, we have reached
a condition in this country which threatens
constitutional liberty, freedom and rights in all
parts of the world. - (Neatby, 154)
30The Dissolution Crisis
- King launches attack on two fronts
- The Legality of the Ministry
- The Robb Motion
- If Ministers are legally administering
departments, they should have vacated their
seats - If Ministers do not legally hold office, they had
no right to govern
31The Dissolution Crisis
- Meighens government falls by one vote
- King expects Byng to invite him to be PM again,
but if not, thats OK - I cannot but believe Lord Byng will now send
for meconstitutionally it is his only course If
another mistake were made on the Govs part we
would wish for no finer election issue - (Neatby, 156)
32The Election of 1926
- Kings election strategy is two-dimensional
- Policy pensions, low tariff
- Co-ordination with Progressives
- Responsible Government
- Paint Tories as party to dictatorship
- Provides King with a niche to differentiate
Liberals from Progs.
33The Election of 1926
- Opposition Leader Opens Campaign With Accusation
That Opponent Has Handed Insult to Parliament - Declares this Issue Overshadows Everything Else
That Present Premier Has Made the Crown a Party
to a Series of Unconstitutional Acts Without
Parallel in Parliamentary Institutions - (Globe Mail, 24 July 1926)
34The Election of 1926
- King defends his (questionable) role in affairs
- The first question I should like to ask is, Was
I right or was I wrong in the advice I tendered
his Excellency in saying that dissolution was
necessary inevitable. If I was wrong on Monday
in advising dissolution as the only solution of
the existing situation, why was the same advice
considered sound when coming from Mr. Meighen on
Friday of the same week?
35The Election of 1926
- Meighens initial reaction is to focus on
corruption - The late ministers of Mr. Mackenzie King and
Mr. Mackenzie King himself, defeated by the
people, censured by the representatives of the
nation, these men surely have no title to be
restored to office now. (Graham 1968, 68)
36The Election of 1926
- but eventually he has to respond to the
constitutional issue - Whenever Mr. King is out of power, the
constitution is in danger. - (Neatby 161)
37The Election of 1926
- and eventually try to redefine it
- to raise the spirit which actuated in his old
grandfather, William Lyon Mackenzie King that
of rebellion. His motive is to stir up feelings
against the British and Lord Byng, and we are
determined to let the people know where he will
lead them into the hands of the United States. - (Duffy 2002, 144)