Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul

Description:

Ethernet wireline costs grow gently with large bandwidth increases (Eth, DSL, PON, cable) ... Used for test, monitoring and network separation. Provides far ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:175
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: MarkFi1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul


1
Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul
2
Topics Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul
  • Current market situation and trends
  • Activating Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul
  • Issues and Solutions for Mobile Backhaul
  • MEFs role in enabling Mobile Backhaul
    infrastructure deployment
  • Questions from the Audience

3
Panelists
Dan Lewallen Product Manager Tellabs dan.lewallen_at_
tellabs.com 214-316-3703
Michael Haugh Sr. Product Manager Ixia mhaugh_at_ixia
com.com 818-610-9201
Jeremy Brayley Director of Technology
Strategy Network Solutions Division ECI Telecom
Ltd. jeremy.brayley_at_ecitele.com 1-412-809-4302
Mark McDonald VP Product Management Ceterus
Networks mmcdonald_at_ceterusnetworks.com 469-330-626
6
4
Current Situation and Trends
  • Dan Lewallen
  • Tellabs

5
Mobile Backhaul Trends Market Perspective
  • Over 2.5 billion mobile phone users in 2006,
    growing to 3.6 billion in 2010
  • Growing dependence on mobile connection
  • Data mobility for all
  • Data, video applications growing
  • Traffic grows exponentially, ARPU/revenue does
    not
  • The 1 driver for new backhaul technologies
  • Carrier Ethernet for backhaul
  • Ethernet microwave
  • Wireline Ethernet over copper, coax, fiber,
    DOCSIS, DSL, PON

Source Infonetics Research, 2008
6
Mobile Backhaul Has Dynamic Growth
  • New mobile applications and bandwidth
    growth(gt100 in 2008 with much more to come)

9/06
7/07
Movies, music, news, more music, text, web, more
content ..
7
Industry trends
  • Demand for bandwidth will grow

    disproportionately more than

    revenue for the operator
  • The bandwidth increase will primarily be on Best
    Effort data user services, and driven by flat
    fee business models
  • Search for technologies to provide cheaper and
    more effective ways to meet the capacity grow at
    a lower CAPEX and OPEX
  • Evolution towards Ethernet/IP based mobile
    solutions

Source Light Reading
8
Activating Carrier Ethernet for Mobile Backhaul
  • Mark McDonald
  • Ceterus Networks

9
What the Wireless Carriers are Thinking about
  • Migration to IP
  • WiMax LTE are all IP
  • CDMA is moving there rapidly
  • UMTS 3G is moving to IP via ATM, Ethernet
    Radios this year
  • Cell Site equipment Mobile applications being
    designed for IP
  • Circuit Emulation to sustain TDM infrastructure
  • Bandwidth Growth Need to plan for 15 to 20
    times the growth of bandwidth and systems over
    the next 5 to 8 years.
  • Mobile operators are looking to Lower Costs
  • Broadband costs less per bit than T1
  • Reduce the amount of systems -- simplify

10
Ethernet Options Solve Backhaul Cost Problem
  • PDH (T1/E1 etc.) costs climb directly with
    bandwidth
  • Ethernet wireline costs grow gently with large
    bandwidth increases (Eth, DSL, PON, cable)
  • New IP/Ethernet wireline options to satisfy the
    the 1 investment driver operational cost savings

Stay on PDH
Ethernet
Source Infonetics Research Mobile Backhaul
Equipment, Installed Base, and Services, 2007
11
Mobile Backhaul Options
1000BT
100BT
GigE
GBE Direct Fiber
10/100BT
WDM
EoDOCSIS
Leased Ethernet
Service Provider Network
100BT
ADM
EoSONET/SDH
Radio
RAN NC
Leased T1/DS3
PON
nxT1
EoT1/DS3
100BT
  • Mobile backhaul Ethernet can be delivered over a
    variety of access technologies

12
Ethernet Growth by Backhaul Technology
New Circuit Growth North America
  • Source Heavy Reading, 4Q07
  • In North America, T1s continue to be the dominant
    backhaul technology for the period 2007-2011. For
    new Ethernet deployments, most will be served by
    Ethernet over fiber (59) and microwave (25)
    technologies.

13
Network Transformation
Progression to an All-Packet Network
Base Station Interfaces
2G/2.5G TDMGSM/GPRS, TDMA, CDMA
3G ATM UMTS Rel. 99
3G/4G Ethernet/IP UMTS rev. 56, CDMA 1X EV-DO,
WiMax, UTRAN LTE
Benefits Scalable bandwidth, OpEx savings with
fast ROI, future proof architecture Challenge
Precise timing over asynchronous packet networks,
OAM, availability of high speed links (fiber)
14
Challenges and Requirements
  • Transport providers are trying to
  • Support multiple operators at the same tower
  • Accurately and independently regenerate timing
    per mobile operator
  • Deliver quality service (low latency, jitter and
    packet loss)
  • Support variety of cellular protocols with TDM,
    ATM and Ethernet interfaces
  • Provide diagnostic tools to operator, such as
    in-band facility loopbacks
  • Find hardened units for use in compact outdoor
    cabinets

15
Challenges and Requirements
  • Mobile operators are looking for flexible
    equipment that can
  • Take advantage of the lowest cost, highest
    bandwidth access networks
  • Optimize usage of access links with intelligent
    oversubscription, idle flag suppression, Abis
    optimization, DBA, per VC switching, etc.
  • Detect faults and network degradation (excessive
    latency, jitter, etc.)
  • Monitor performance to ensure SLA guarantees are
    met

16
Carrier Ethernet can provide Mobile Backhaul
Radio Access Network
Mobile Core Network
2G/3G/xG Base Stations
Aggregation
MSC
Voice Trunking
Node-B / BTS/
BSC RNC
Pseudowire
MSC
Intelligent Demarcation
WiMAX
MSC
Wireless
TrafficOptimization
Node-B / BTS/
  • Reduce transport costs by migrating 2G/2.5G, 3G
    and 4G to scalable, lower cost, higher bandwidth
    Ethernet

17
Issues and Solutions for Mobile Backhaul
  • Michael Haugh
  • Ixia

18
Mobile Backhaul Issues SLAs and PM
  • Ethernet service performance and SLAs, especially
    delay and delay variation are key to Mobile
    backhaul applications
  • SLAs Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) 10.1
  • Recommended key parameters for SLAs Service
    availability, frames lost, frame delay, frame
    delay variation
  • Defined the what, not the how
  • MEF 14 provides a test specification and
    certification
  • Monitoring RFC-2819 - RMON Etherstats
  • Monitoring of local performance (eg node or LAN)
  • Fault Management ITU-T Y.1731 IEEE 802.1ag
    Standards
  • Focused on end to end service (WAN)
  • Both provide fault management, Y.1731 provides
    performance measurement including frame delay,
    frame delay variation, frame loss ratio
  • Standards based testing MEF / IETF
  • MEF 9, 14, 18, 19 RFC 2544 standards for lab
    based testing and maintenance window testing

19
NID/Demarcation device MEF UNI
UNI Demarcation
Carrier network
Customer network
100FX/GbE, EoTDM or EoCopper
Carrier network
10/100BT
Customer equipment
Demarcation device
Customer premise Eg Cell site
  • Three key functions for Ethernet NID/demarcation
  • Link/Service layer Ethernet OAM
    802.3ah/802.1ag/Y.1731
  • Ethernet Service UNI (User Network Interface)
  • Service layer policing and definition MEF
  • Integrated first mile transport
  • Extend Ethernet reach over Fiber (GbE/100FX,
    EoOC-n/STM-n, EoDS3/E3) or copper (EoDSL,
    EoT1/E1, EoNxT1/E1)

20
Demarcation device MEF NNI
Carrier B network
E-NNI Demarcation
Carrier B network
Carrier A network
GbE
GbE
Carrier A network
Carrier B network
Demarcation device
Central office
  • Key functions for MEF E-NNI (External Network to
    Network Interface) demarcation device
  • Link/Service layer Ethernet OAM
    802.3ah/802.1ag/Y.1731
  • Service layer policing/shaping and definition
    MEF
  • Protection mechanisms - LAG, MSTP
  • Throughput Test RFC-2544

21
Wholesale Provider UNI demarcation
  • UNI demarcation device critical for Ethernet
    service delivery
  • Media conversion
  • Loopbacks/testing
  • SLA monitoring

10/100BT
100FX/GbE
10/100BT
EoT1, DS3, OC-3
NNI
Carrier WAN
Mobile Switching Center
EoDOCSIS, EoCu
10/100BT
GbE
10/100BT
nxT1
Wireless Carrier
Wireless Carrier
Wholesale Access Network
22
Wholesale Provider - NNI demarcation
  • NNI handoff key to carrier to carrier hand-off or
    demarcation
  • Used for test, monitoring and network separation
  • Provides far end MEP/MIP for SLA monitoring

10/100BT
100FX/GbE
10/100BT
NNI
EoT1, DS3, OC-3
Mobile Switching Center
Carrier WAN
EoDOCSIS, EoCu
10/100BT
GbE
10/100BT
nxT1
Wholesale Access Network
Wireless Carrier
Wireless Carrier
23
Wireless Service Provider
  • Wireless UNI demarc device at cell site performs
    3 key functions
  • Remote test/loopbacks
  • SLA monitoring
  • Traffic shaping MEF UNI

10/100BT
100FX/GbE
T1, DS3, OC-3
10/100BT
Carrier WAN
Mobile Switching Center
EoDOCSIS, EoCu
GbE
10/100BT
nxT1
10/100BT
Wholesale Access Network (eg MSO)
Wireless Carrier
Wireless Carrier
24
Traffic Shaping
100M
10M
EoX
100BT
100BT
Third Party Carrier Network
10M Service
UNI
Radio Equipment
Third party demarcation device
Cell site
  • 100M radio output drives a 10M service
  • Excess traffic can be dropped (policed) or
    buffered (shaped)
  • Shaping in Wireless Carrier demarc ensures that
    no traffic gets dropped
  • With multiple wholesale carriers
    shaping/policing capabilities and buffer settings
    will vary greatly

25
SLAs, Fault Management and Perf Monitoring
  • SLAs can differentiate service offerings, MEF
    10.1 outlines standard metrics for service
    attributes
  • Monitoring is required to deliver SLA reporting
  • Standards based Fault Management and Performance
    Monitoring is available, but requires equipment
    end-to-end that supports it
  • Clear demarcation and testing within and across
    UNI/NNI boundaries is required
  • Lab testing is required and MEF certification is
    available which will also help to differentiate
    services

26
MEFs role in enabling Mobile Backhaul
infrastructure deployment
  • Jeremy Brayley
  • ECI Telecom Ltd.

27
Mobile Backhaul Implementation Agreement
  • The structure of the document provides generic
    guidelines for several mobile technologies
    specific guidelines for a given mobile technology
    may also be specified
  • MEF Mobile Backhaul
  • Standardized services
  • Certification
  • Interoperability
  • UNI Requirements
  • Ethernet OAM (Link OAM and Service OAM)
  • Protection and Fault Recovery Requirements
  • Service Requirements
  • CoS Requirements
  • Service Definitions
  • Synchronization

28
Todays Mobile Backhaul MEF Use Cases
  • The Implementation Agreement identifies four
    generic deployment scenarios that capture the
    main short term and long term deployment
    possibilities

Legacy
Legacy Transport
Legacy RAN
Legacy RAN
Legacy non-packet RAN and non-packet
transport
29
Packet offload over carrier Ethernet 1a
Legacy
Carrier Ethernet Network
Generic Interworking Function
Generic Interworking Function
UNI
UNI
Legacy Network
RAN BTS
RAN NC
  • Overlay MEN does bandwidth offloading onto
    Ethernet services
  • Legacy network continues to transport voice and
    deliver timing

30
Emulation over Carrier Ethernet 1b
Legacy
Carrier Ethernet Network
Generic Interworking Function
Generic Interworking Function
RAN BTS
UNI
UNI
RAN NC
  • RAN nodes with legacy interfaces transport all
    traffic over Ethernet services using emulation
    technologies

31
RAN dual stack 2a
Legacy
Eth/IP
Legacy Network
Carrier Ethernet Network
RAN BTS
UNI
UNI
RAN NC
  • RAN nodes are equipped with Ethernet and legacy
    interfaces
  • Overlay legacy network transport voice and
    delivers sync MEN is used for BW offloading

32
Full Ethernet BTS and Transport Network 2b
Eth/IP
Carrier Ethernet Network
RAN BTS
UNI
UNI
RAN NC
  • New RAN nodes with native Ethernet interfaces
  • All traffic is transported over Ethernet services

33
Separation of Voice and HSPA Data over Ethernet /
IPUse case 1ab and 2ab example
Use Case 1a
NE1 ATM/IMA or STM1/VC4
Cell Site
TDM or ATM Backhaul
T1/E1/ orATM Aggregation
Voice
Data
Node B / BTS
FE / GE Aggregation
RNC/BSC
FE/GE
Use Case 1b
Pico/Femto
NT1/E1 ATM/IMA or STM1/VC4
Ethernet / MPLS All-IP
Ethernet
FE / GE Aggregation
RNC/BSC
NT1/E1TDM
Use Case 2a/b same as 1a/b except BTS/NodeB have
Ethernet Interfaces
34
MEF 18 Certification for Mobile Backhaul CES
  • MEF 8 Emulation of PDH Circuits over Metro
    Ethernet Networks
  • MEF 18 provides standard testing of Circuit
    Emulation Services over Ethernet
  • Lead by strong service provider demand
  • Industry first impairment testing brings first
    test of emulation of clock recovery
  • Raise the level of confidence that clock recovery
    will meet the stringent requirements of mobile
    backhaul.

35
Closing
  • Carrier Ethernet is in demand for Mobile Backhaul
  • There are Ethernet deployment options for all
    mobile backhaul situations
  • Carrier Ethernet technology is rising to meet the
    stringent technical and operational requirements
    of Mobile Backhaul
  • The MEF is working in conjunction with other
    standards organizations to ensure that scalable
    solutions are available

36
Panelists
Dan Lewallen Product Manager Tellabs dan.lewallen_at_
tellabs.com 214-316-3703
Michael Haugh Sr. Product Manager Ixia mhaugh_at_ixia
com.com 818-610-9201
Jeremy Brayley Director of Technology
Strategy Network Solutions Division ECI Telecom
Ltd. jeremy.brayley_at_ecitele.com 1-412-809-4302
Mark McDonald VP Product Management Ceterus
Networks mmcdonald_at_ceterusnetworks.com 469-330-626
6
37
Thank You
Next 11.15 am Video Case Studies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com