The Good News about The Bad News Gospel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The Good News about The Bad News Gospel

Description:

... that despite short-term incentives to cheat it is our human nature that ... Future benefits outweigh short term gains from cheating. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: budb
Category:
Tags: bad | cheating | good | gospel | news

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Good News about The Bad News Gospel


1
The Good NewsaboutThe Bad News Gospel
2
The BAD News Gospel
  • Humans are fallen, depraved and incapable of
    doing the right thing
  • Human Nature is intrinsically evil.
  • I am not responsible
  • God is to blame, not I

3
The Good News
  • Its more complicated than that
  • You are responsiblewhich means you can change
    things.
  • The good news is that despite short-term
    incentives to cheat it is our human nature that
    allows us to reason and to make better choices
    for the long-term.

4
If all you are getting is the Bad News
  • think about what human nature really is.
  • act in accordance with the design.
  • Live with the grain.

5
What is Human Nature?
  • Humans have the ability to graspand act
    uponabstract concepts.
  • Humans have the ability to envision the future.
  • Humans have the ability to understand that other
    humans are their equals.
  • Humans have the ability to build a world that
    works better for all of us.
  • Children reach the age of reason.

6
All People are Created Equal
  • If you have the right to do something to somebody
    else,
  • They have the same right to do the same thing to
    you.
  • Any rights that cant be universalized are not
    rights
  • Your rights to swing your arm end at the other
    persons nose.

7
Partnership
8
What is winning?
  • Does winning mean defeating your opponent?

9
The Pragmatic Partnership Ethic
  • Whether or not you think of this as an ethical
    issue
  • The fundamental question is
  • Is this a one-time opportunity to grab and runOr
    is this a long-term relationship?
  • Future benefits outweigh short term gains from
    cheating.
  • Examples of the cooperative stance in games
  • The quality premium in marketing-a fair profit
  • Buy quality and youll only cry once
  • TQM
  • Supply Chain Management The extended
    enterprise.
  • There is never a last round
  • Even if this is your last contact with this
    partner, Your approach will earn you a long-term
    reputation that will carry over to business with
    others.
  • The Radar OReilly Phenomenon.
  • Your spouse and your children

10
None of this is new
  • This Pragmatic Partnership Ethic can be described
    as enlightened self-interest.
  • Rational Selfishness is a virtue
  • The Pragmatic Partnership Ethic has a common
    name.

11
But
  • Does that mean you should always turn the other
    cheek and let unscrupulous people run over you?

12
There is a problem with this
  • 1.There are jerks everywhere (about 5).
  • 2.Jerks change the game from win-win to
    lose-lose.
  • 3. If you dont protect yourself, you will get
    hurt and jerks will be empowered to hurt others.
  • 4. But if you treat everyone as jerks, it will
    wreck the game and everyone will lose.

13
The Evolution of Cooperation (Robert
Axelrod, 1985)
  • Simulation tournament of strategies for the
    Iterated Prisoners Dilemma (IPD).
  • The simplest strategy, Tit-for-tat (TFT) was most
    consistently the winner.
  • Tit-for-tat start with cooperation, then echo
    the opponents move on the last round.
  • Properties
  • Nice, never the first to defect
  • Provocable, immediately, on one defection
  • Forgiving, can return to cooperation after
    defection.
  • Simple and Transparent, the opponent knows what
    will happen.

14
Tit-for-tat
  • TFT wins but not by defeating opponents, but by
    doing better with other TFT players.
  • By definition, TFT can, at best, have a tie score
    in a series with a single opponent.
  • No opponent is ever defeated.
  • But TFT accumulates higher total scores by
    finding and cooperating with cooperative players,
    while avoiding being taken advantage of by the
    defectors.
  • TFT demands only equity, doing well by promoting
    mutual interest rather than exploiting weakness.

15
  • What is winning?
  • Winning isnt beating your opponent.
  • Winning is achieved by helping your opponent to
    win too.

16
Evolutionary gamesand growth of a just
civilization
  • Successful strategies prosper and grow
  • Less successful strategies diminish
  • A consistent defection (meanies) culture can
    only be stable if nice players are isolated
    from each other.
  • A nice culture is stable and can resist
    invasion by meanies only if the TFT rule is
    followed
  • avoid exploitation Be provocable by the first
    defection of the other player.
  • TFT also helps others by making it harder for
    exploitative strategies to survive.
  • Axelrods Conclusion
  • Reciprocity is a better foundation for morality
    than is unconditional cooperation.

17
Justice protects the weak and maintains
civilization
  • It is not moral to tolerate the bully.

If you do not visit bad neighborhoods,
then bad neighborhoods will visit you.
18
The Tit-for-Tat Rule in Games(Simulation
studies indicate Tit-for-tat strategy gives the
best expected results when dealing with the 5
who are jerks)
  • 1. Treat everyone as if they belong to the other
    95 (suffer occasional vulnerability as a price
    for pursuing the best long-run average result).
  • 2. If someone acts like a jerk, thump them.
  • 3. If they continue to be jerks, thump them
    harder.
  • Accept conversions, but,
  • 4. Don't let a few jerks wreck the game for
    everyone else.
  • 5. Arrange future endeavors to exclude jerks.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com