Title: Health Care Reform: An Economic Perspective
1Health Care ReformAn Economic Perspective
- Bill Evans
- Department of Economics and Econometrics
2Motivation for talk
- No Federal reform effort since 1994
- Re-emergence as a political issue
- Reform packages from nearly all presidential
candidates - States are forcing the issue
3Kaiser Family FoundationTracking Survey June
2007
- What two issues you would most like to hear the
presidential candidates talk about? - Iraq 43
- Health care 21
- Immigration 18
- Economy 13
- Gas price/Energy 12
- Terrorism/Nat. Sec. 7
4Outline of talk
- What problems must reforms address?
- What have we learned from reform?
- Outline some current alternatives
- Examine some likely economic consequences
5Talk may be premature
- Uncertain who the Democratic nominee will be
- one plan will become irrelevant
- Plan of the presumptive Republican nominee
somewhat ill-formed at this point
6What we will not talk about?
7- Many countries have single-payer system
- Generates low administrative costs but (arguably)
poorer quality care - US companies process 700 billion in HC claims
each year - The US is not about to get rid of a 700 billion
industry
8What are the issues?
- Cost/Expenditures
- Fiscal (taxes and expenditures)
- Equity
- Coverage
9Expenditures on Medical Care
- 2 trillion annually
- 16 GDP
- 6000/person
- Twice as much as the median OECD country
1090 more than Canada
145 more than the UK
11(No Transcript)
12Average Annual PremiumsCovered Workers, 2006
(KFF)
- Individual plan
- 4,242 total
13(No Transcript)
14Are high expenditures a bad thing?
- A key driver of health care costs is technology
- MRIs/CT scans, angioplasty, anti-psychotropic
drugs, hip/knee replacements, neo-natal intensive
care, treatments for AIDS, statin drugs (Lipitor)
- All not available 20 years ago. Now, commonplace
15HIV/AIDS Drugs
- Early 1990s, 8 quarterly mortality rates for
patients w/ AIDS - 19954, 19961, three new drug introduced to
fight virus - Work by preventing the virus from replicating in
the host - Usage rates increase immediately and aggregate
mortality falls 70 in 18 months
16(No Transcript)
17- AIDS drugs are expensive, 12K/year in some cases
- AIDS patients are expensive, 20K/year
- This medical advance by construction increases
lifetime spending by a considerably amount
18- ARVs increase lifespan after diagnosis with AIDS
by almost 8 years - Lifetime cost of treating an AIDS patient
increases by about 250K - This is expensive, but compared to many other
programs, it is relatively cheap on a
cost-per-life-year saved amount
19NICU
- Specialty wards of hospitals that provide
constant nursing and continuous cardiopulmonary
and other support for severely ill infants - Developed in late 1950 early 1970s
- Growth has been rapid
- NICU beds increased by 150 1980-1995
20Costs, 2001 CA
- NICU discharge 50,000
- Non-NICU, 4,500
- In CA, 10 of births are for a NICU
- Therefore, more than half the hospital cost of
childbirth are attributable to NICUs
21(No Transcript)
22But. not getting the bang per buck
- Overhead costs are high (NEJM, 2003)
- 31 in US
- lt 2 in Canada
- Unnecessary care (Dartmouth Atlas)
- 30 of care has little medical benefit
- US performs poorly in comparison
- Higher infant mortality
- Lower life expectancy
234.3 years less than Japan
2.4 years Less than Canada
24If you want to cut costs, where do you look?
- Administrative/overhead
- Unnecessary procedures
- Chronic conditions
- 20 of people responsible for 80 spending
25What are the issues?
- Cost/Expenditures
- Fiscal (taxes and expenditures)
- Equity
- Coverage
26Government Insurance
- Federal government largest health insurance
provider - Medicaid and Medicare
- 95 million covered in 2006
- 540 billion
- 21 percent of the federal budget
27Medicare
- 42.4 million recipients in 2006
- Costs in 2006
- 342 billion
- 14 of Federal expenditures
- Financing
- Part A financed by payroll tax (2.9)
- Part B/D financed by premiums (25) and general
revenues (75)
28Future problems
- Costs of program are expected to escalate between
now and 2030 - At the same time, fewer workers to tax
- Medicare Trustees predict
- Costs gt revenues by 2011
- Trust fund exhausted by 2019
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32What are the issues?
- Cost/Expenditures
- Fiscal (taxes and expenditures)
- Equity
- Coverage
33Tax System Equity
- EPHI health insurance is a tax-free fringe
benefit - Greatly reduces the cost to consumers of
purchasing insurance - Has encouraged the growth of EPHI
- Now, most people w/ private insurance get is
through their employers
34Tax Benefit of EPHI
- A family w/ 70,000 in income
- 36.4 marginal tax rate
- 25 federal
- 3.4 state (Indiana)
- 8 Social Security and Medicare
- Want to purchase 12,000 policy in AFTER TAX
DOLLARS
35Without tax advantage
- Receive 18,897 in income
- Pay 36.4 or 6,897 in taxes
- 12,000 left over for health insurance
- Net benefit of tax deduction is 6,897
36Inequalities
- Tax break only available to people who receive
insurance from their firm - Higher income families have higher tax rates so
the tax benefit to them is greater - Costs over 210 billion/year
37(No Transcript)
38What are the issues?
- Cost/Expenditures
- Fiscal (taxes and expenditures)
- Equity
- Coverage
39Coverage
- Uninsurance is a persistent problem in US
- Dimensions of the problem
- 47 million people
- 16 of population
- 9 million children
- Uninsurance rates have increased steadily over
time
40Who are the uninsured?
- Race
- White 10.8
- Black 20.5
- Hispanic 34.1
- Age
- lt18 11.7
- 18-24 29.3
- 25-34 26.9
- 35-64 16.0
- 65 1.5
- Family Income
- lt25K 24.9
- 25-50K 21.1
- 50-75K 14.4
- gt75K 8.5
41Time Series
- Number uninsured
- 31 million in 1987
- 47 million in 2006
- Percent uninsured
- 12.6 in 1987
- 15.8 in 2006
42What have we been doing the past 13 years?
- Two major efforts aimed at coverage
- Medicare Part D
- SCHIP program
- Movement to managed care
- BUT.Most of the action has been with states
- unsuccessful but informative
43Small Group Reform
- People without EPHI or small firms must purchase
insurance in the Small Group Market - Small groups tend to have
- Higher prices
- Higher administrative fees
- Prices that are volatile
44- Prices are a function of the demographics
- Concern prices for some groups too high
- Lower prices for some by community rating
- Nearly all states have adopted some version of
small group reform in 1990s
45What happened?
- Increased the price for low risk customers
- Healthy 30 year old pays 180/month in PA
- 420/month in NJ with community ratings
- Low risks promptly left the market
- Which raised prices
- Policy did everything wrong
46Lesson
- Idea was correct
- Use low risk to subsidize the high risk
- But you cannot allow the low risk to exit the
market
47Massachusetts Reform
48MA Reform Romney
- Most ambitious state reform to date
- Many features but..
- Most striking component Individual mandate
- Required by law to carry insurance
49MA Reform
- If you require insurance, you need to make it
affordable - State subsidizes purchases for poor
- Firms must establish Section 125 plans
- Established the Connector
50Connector
- Merge of individual and small group market
- Market maker in insurance
- Community rating
- Requirements on what plans must have
51Connector
- Cheapest individual plans cost about 200/month
- 40-60 lower than average plan
- Was achieved primarily by higher cost sharing
52Results from MA
- It was estimated that 500K were uninsured and
300K have been added to insurance rolls - State underestimated
- Number uninsured
- Uninsured eligible for subsidized care
- Cost of the program are exceeding expectations
53Exporting MA Plan?
- Plan is being studied extensively by
- Other states
- Presidential candidates
- MA is very unique so it might not travel
- Lower uninsurance rate (9)
- Unique fiscal situation that was used to finance
the law
54Other reform plans
- Obama and Clinton have offered detailed plans
- Both loosely based on the MA reform
- Clintons is nearly identical to Edwards
- Maintain EPHI as basis of system
- Try to lower costs to those without EPHI so they
can afford insurance - Plans vary in detail but contain many
similarities
55Democratic plans
Edwards Obama Clinton
Pay or Play Yes Yes Yes
Connector Type plan Yes Yes Yes
Subsidize/ Tax credits Yes Yes Yes
Individual mandates Yes No Yes
56Clinton
- Those without insurance can purchase through same
insurance members of Congress have - Insurance subsidies for low income
- Reliance on preventive care/disease management to
reduce costs to make affordable - Individual mandates
57Obama
- Mandates for children
- Employer mandates
- Expansion of SCHIP/Medicaid
58Cost savings proposals in Obamas Plan
- Health IT systems
- 10 billion/year for 5 years
- Heavy emphasis on disease management
- Effort to standardize care for chronically ill
- Performance based rewards (MDs)
- Rx reform (generics, importation, negot.)
59Pay or Play
- Firms must pay 5 wage bill to health insurance
or pay that as a fine - Proposed in 26 states in 2006
- Language -- firms must pay their fair share
- Problem ignores the realities of the labor
market
60- Insurance is one component of a compensation
package - Increased costs in one area will be paid for by
reducing on costs in another (wages) - In long run, costs will be borne by workers
61Will firms pay or play?
- In March 2007, Private industry
- Average hourly comp. 27.61
- Wages/salaries 18.34 (71)
- Health insurance 1.83 (7.1)
- Wal-Mart pays 5-7
- Only 40 Wal-Mart workers receive their care
through the firm
62Cost reduction
- Variety of ways to reduce costs
- Computer investments (medical records)
- Preventive services
- Disease management
- Best practices
- Way to self finance plans
- Problem
- Returns are years away
- Preventive/DM not really cost saving
63Example Cervical Cancer Screening
- 11,500 cases in 2007, approx. 4000 deaths
- 4th leading cause of cancer death in women
- Cheap test available Pap smear 40
- Expensive to treat (30,000/case)
- Consider universal testing every three years for
women 45-64
64- 37 million in this group
- Cancer incidence rate of 16/100,000
- Approx 6000 new cases per year
- Suppose test every three years prevents ALL
cervical cancers for 3 years - Costs 1.1 billion
- Save 540 million
- Net program cost 560 million
65Result
- Universal testing is a good idea
- saves lives
- it is a COST EFFECTIVE
- However, in most cases, mass screening is not
COST SAVING
66- Its a nice thing to think, and it seems like it
should be true, but I dont know of any evidence
that preventive care actually saves money, - Jon Gruber, MIT Economics professor and architect
of the Massachusetts Connector plan
67What is different now?
- Leaves current system intact, builds out
- Individual mandates
- Pay or play
- Belief we can generate more uniformity in
practice patterns to save costs
68What is missing?
- Little discussion of Medicare
- Attacks costs by spending more money
- Little discussion about the need for more cost
sharing
69McCain
- Uninsurance is a problem of cost
- Attack costs, reduce premiums, increase coverage
, - Offers variety of proposals designed to drive
down costs - Increase competition in insurance
- Malpractice reform
- Increase accountability
70Highlights
- Purchase insurance from nationwide pools
- Obtain insurance through any group, not just
employers - Encourage retail medical outlets
- Base pay on performance
- Establish national standards for treatment
71Tax Credits
- Eliminate tax deductibility of EPHI
- Replace with tax credit for people with health
insurance - 2500 for individuals
- 5000 for families
- Tax benefit the same for everyone, regardless of
income
72Concerns
- The subsidy rate is not high enough for low
income people - What will happen to employer-provided health
insurance?
73Summary
- Clinton
- Primarily attacks uninsurance problem
- Individual mandates
- Pay or play
- Imposes lots of (potentially costly) programs
like preventive medicine - Individual mandates make the plan politically
challenging
74- Obama
- Attacks costs first
- Most aggressive cost-saving but, benefits are
years away from being realized - Some impact on uninsurance through expansions of
SCHIP/Medicaid, pay-or-play - Benefits to working uninsured will be long in the
future when/if costs have been reduced
75- McCain
- Riskiest program because it blows up EPHI
- Replaces with a tax credit
- Estimates suggest it will have minimal impact on
uninsurance - Questionable impact on costs -- any benefits are
long in the future