Quasiexperimental Designs, Experimental Designs, and SingleSubject Designs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Quasiexperimental Designs, Experimental Designs, and SingleSubject Designs

Description:

(treat one group but not the other, OR use 2 different ... Many researchers do both in protocol and intent to treat analyses and compare the analyses. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: laurak9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quasiexperimental Designs, Experimental Designs, and SingleSubject Designs


1
Quasi-experimental Designs, Experimental Designs,
and Single-Subject Designs
  • OT 667
  • July 1, 2002

2
Experimental Design
  • Control Group
  • Random Assignment
  • Manipulate a variable
  • (treat one group but not the other, OR use 2
    different treatments)

3
Control Groups
  • Assume equivalence between control group and
    treatment group
  • Help rule out extraneous effects of treatment
    which can affect change rather than the treatment
    itself (getting out of the house, receiving
    attention)
  • When a control group is not possible..
  • Compare treatments (problem when treatment of
    comparison has not been previously assessed using
    a control group)

4
Random Assignment
  • Subjects have an equal change of being assigned
    to the control or treatment group
  • Assures group equivalence
  • What do we mean by group equivalence????

5
Intent to Treat
  • A principle used when subjects are randomly
    assigned to groups but then, for various reasons,
    do not stay in their assigned group
  • Can use on-protocol assessment, where the data
    are assessed including the patients in their
    respective groups.
  • Group sizes are unequal
  • Bias in favor of the treatment variable under
    study

6
An intent to treat analysis analyzes the data
with subjects outcomes included in the group to
which they were assigned. Makes it much harder
to find significant differences
7
Many researchers do both in protocol and intent
to treat analyses and compare the analyses. If
the results are the same, all is good. If not,
you have spent a lot of time and money for
equivocal results..
8
Manipulation of Variables
  • Variable - predetermined treatment or
    intervention
  • Active variable one that is manipulated by the
    researcher
  • Attribute variable traits of subjects, such as
    age, diagnosis, gender, etc cannot be
    manipulated by the researcher
  • Can manipulate one or more active variables at
    the same time
  • Can also assign people with various attribute
    levels to receive the active variable

9
Blinding in Research
The purpose of blinding is to minimize bias in
the process of recording or collecting
information about the outcome of the treatment.
10
So who gets blinded?
  • Subjects
  • Persons administering the treatment
  • Persons collecting the data
  • Persons analyzing the data

11
Controlling for Differences within a Study
  • Selection of homogenous subjects
  • Blocking
  • Matching
  • Subjects as their own control
  • Analysis of co-variance

12
Does the experimental treatment really cause the
observed change in the dependent variable?This
question addresses the internal validity of a
study.
13
Threats to Internal Validity
  • History
  • Maturation
  • Attrition
  • Testing
  • Instrumentation
  • Statistical Regression
  • Selection
  • Ambiguity about Direction of Causal Influence
  • Treatment Diffusion
  • Demoralization of respondents receiving treatment
    assumed to be less desirable

14
Can the results of the study be generalized to
the population of whom the sample is
representative in a given study? This question
asks about the external validity of a study.
15
Threats to External Validity
  • Interaction of Treatment and Selection
  • Interaction of Treatment and Setting
  • Interaction of Treatment and History

16
Quasi-experimental Research
17
Quasi-experimental designs are those studies
which do not use random assignment for
comparisons. Many such studies also do not use a
control group
18
Rationale for Using Quasi-Experimental Design
  • Clinical limitations space, time, money,
    equipment/personnel needed to provide
    treatments.
  • Use of quasi-experimental design can be a step to
    collect data to apply for funding for
    experimental design
  • Ethical issues random assignment and use of a
    control group are not always acceptable to the
    population or sample under study

19
Kinds of Quasi-Experimental Designs
  • One group pretest-posttest design
  • Time Series design
  • Nonequivalent pretest-posttest design
  • Nonequivalent posttest only design

20
Single-Subject Design
21
Single subject designs are a controlled
experimental approach to the study of a single
case or small group of subjects. The subject is
used as his/her own control to demonstrate the
effect of a treatment over time.
22
Characteristics of Single Subject Designs
  • Clear definition of the independent and dependent
    variables
  • The design is broken into phases
  • Data is collected in a series of repeated
    measures across the phases

23
When are Single Subject Designs Used?
  • To study treatment of rare conditions
  • To study a new treatment protocol
  • To document the outcomes of treatment in a
    systematic manner
  • When preparing a new treatment protocol to go on
    to a larger study and you need to work out the
    problems with the intervention

24
Phases of Studies
  • Baseline phase
  • Looking for stability
  • Looking for trends
  • Intervention phases
  • Phases where treatment is administered

25
The target behavior
  • The target behavior is the characteristic you
    are attempting to change via the independent
    variable.
  • Measurement of the target behavior can be done
    via counts of observed behavior, via tests such
    as ROM, BP, etc.

26
Types of Measures
  • Frequency of observed behavior
  • Duration of observed behavior
  • Magnitude or degree of change in a behavior

27
Kinds of Single Subject Designs
  • Withdrawal designs
  • Alternating treatment designs
  • Changing criterion designs
  • Multiple treatment designs
  • Multiple baseline designs
  • Across subjects
  • Across settings
  • Across behaviors

28
Withdrawal Designs
  • Designs where the treatment is not given or
    withdrawn in specified phases
  • Baseline (no treatment) is measure first
  • A treatment phase occurs where behavior is still
    measured
  • The treatment is then withdrawn and behavior
    measured
  • AB, ABA, or ABAB are common forms

29
Multiple Baseline Designs
  • Collection of data across at least three series
    of events
  • Events can be 3 subjects, 3 settings, 3
    behaviors, and so forth
  • Baseline is gathered in all 3 conditions.
  • When baseline behaviors are stable across all
    conditions, intervention starts in one condition
  • Institution of the intervention is initiated
    sequentially across the other two conditions

30
Data Analysis
  • Is done by visual inspection of the data
  • Changes in trend, level and slope of the behavior
    are inspected
  • Evidence of stability or lack of it affects the
    interpretation of how the treatment worked

31
Statistical Analyses
  • Although visual inspection is the most common
    method of data analysis, some statistical
    analyses are done as well
  • Mean scores, two standard deviation band method
    and others may be used to analyze data

32
Reliability Issues
  • Inter-rater reliability is collected across all
    phases of data
  • Inter-rater agreement is calculated by various
    methods, including total reliability, point by
    point reliability, and others
  • Reliability calculations are critical to insure
    the behaviors being counted are truly present

33
Concerns about Single Subject Designs
  • Hard to generalize from such a small sample of
    subjects
  • Some designs present confounds of effects, such
    as multiple or alternating treatment designs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com