Title: P1249945239qmnLc
1Board of Corrections
Phase II Mentally Ill Offender Crime
Reduction Demonstration Grant Workshop
2LEGISLATION
- Legislative Intent SB 1485
- Grants to Counties to Develop and Implement a
Comprehensive, Cost-Effective Plan to Reduce the
Rate of Crime and Offenses Committed by Persons
with Serious Mental Illness - Reduce Jail Overcrowding
- Reduce Criminal Justice Costs Related to Mentally
Ill Offenders
3LEGISLATION
- SB2108 - Provides Funding
- 2 Million Awarded to Counties for Purposes of
Planning and Developing Continuum of Responses - 24,650,000 for County Demonstration Grants
4LEGISLATION
- SB1485
- Legislature Enacted the Mentally Ill Offender
Crime Reduction Act (MIOCRG Program) - Four Year Program Time Frame
- Commencing in 1999-2000
- Shall Be Used To Supplement, Not to Supplant
5LEGISLATION
- SB1485
- Grant Requires 25 Match
- In Consultation With Department of Mental Health
- Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs
- Requires Assembly of a Local Strategy Committee
6STRATEGY COMMITTEE
- Directed by the Sheriff or Director of County
Corrections Department - Chief Probation Officer
- Local Law Enforcement Agency
- Superior Court Judge
7STRATEGY COMMITTEE
- County Mental Health Director
- Client of Mental Health Facility
- Organizations That Can or Have Provided Treatment
8Process for Program Development
- BOC Appoints ESC Chair and Members
- ESC Meets and Defines Review
- Work Group(s) Meet and Make Recommendations to
ESC - ESC Finalizes Recommendations to BOC
- BOC Modifies and/or Adopt ESCs Recommendations
9Executive Steering Committee
- Harry Nabors - Chair
- CPO Madera County
- Jerry Krans
- Asst. Sheriff Orange County
- Dr. Susan Saxe-Clifford
- BOC Member
- Daniel Ballin
- Programs
10ESC
- Supervisor John Flynn
- Ventura County (CSAC Rep)
- Sheriff Bill Kolender
- San Diego County (CSSA Rep)
- Captain Norm Hurst
- San Bernardino County (CSSA Detentions
Corrections sub-committee Rep)
11ESC
- Deputy Director Gary Pettygrew -
- State Department of Mental Health
- Deputy Director Susan Neesbaum
- State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
- Deputy Director John Anderson
- Humboldt County - California Mental Health
Directors Association Representative
12Grant Criteria Work Group 11-05-98
- Tim Ryan, Chief of Corrections
- Santa Clara Department of Correction
- Sean McDermott, Assistant Sheriff
- Sonoma County Sheriffs Department
- Karen Tait, M.D.
- Corrections Medical Consultant
- Richard McCathron, Commander
- Kern County Sheriffs Department
- Alisa Dunn, Specialist
- Los Angeles County Mental Health Court Programs
13Program Definitions Work Group 11-19-98
- Sametha Cannon
- State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs
- Judy Johnson
- Psychological Services - Sacramento County Jail
- Mel Voyles
- State Department of Mental Health
- Jim Higgins
- State Department of Mental Health
- Richard Blak, Ph.D.
- Forensic Psychologist
14ESC Met on 11-30 and 12-1
- Received Public Comments re MIOCRG Program
- Developed and Adopted
- Grant Applications and Instructions
- Grant Criteria and Critical Issues
- Established Timelines
15It All Begins With Planning
16Phase I Planning Grant Status
17Phase I Planning Grant Status
18Phase I Planning Grant Status
19Phase I Planning Grant Status
20Phase I Planning Grant Status
45 Approved Applications
21Building Your Demonstration Project
Build All Or Portions Of Your Demonstration Projec
t From Your Local Plan
Planning Is The Foundation
22Demonstration GrantRequirements
- Application Deadline - March 10, 1999
- Board of Corrections 600 Bercut Drive,
Sacramento, CA 95814 - Postmarked By Midnight
- Hand Delivered By 500 PM
- No Extensions
23Demonstration GrantRequirements
- One Application From Each County
- Even if Regional Proposal
- Even if Regional Proposal Proposals Require Board
of Supervisors Resolution - Regional Proposal Will Require a Resolution from
Each County Participating - Only One Source May Be Designated To Receive
Funds
24Demonstration GrantRequirements
- Original And 15 Copies
- Including The Local Plan
- Counties Not Participating in Phase I Planning
Are Required to Submit A Local Plan - 12 Point Type Double Spaced
- Please No Bindings, Hard Covers, Tabs
- Counties Not Participating in Demonstration Grant
Must Submit A Local Plan
25Demonstration GrantRequirements
- ELIGIBLITY - All California Counties Eligible for
Demonstration Grants - All Proposals Will Be Evaluated Based Upon
Established Criteria and Merit
26Grant Awards
- Counties Can Apply For Funds Commensurate with
Their Need to Establish Programs Targeting
Mentally Ill Offenders - There Is No Cap - Program Cost Effectiveness Will Be Considered
27Multiple Programs
- Counties May Submit Multiprogram Projects
- Programs Must Be Prioritized in Order of
Importance - Have Separate and Complete Budgets for Each
Program - Must Demonstrate the Capacity to Administer
Multiple Programs
28Evaluation Design
- Evaluation Designs are Required by Statute
29Projects Not Considered
- Seek Reimbursement for County Cost Previously
Incurred - Supplant Existing Programs
- Do Not Have as Primary Goal the Reduction of
- Jail Crowding
- Crime
- Criminal Justice Costs
30Grant Application Highlights - Section 1
- May Be Individual Or Regional Proposal
- Sheriff May Be Different on Phase II Application
Due November Election - Please Include E-mail Address Whenever Possible
31Grant Application Highlights - Section 2
- 25 Match Required
- May Be Hard or In-Kind or Combination
- Priority Will Be Given to Match in Excess of 25
32Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
- Cost Breakdown (Line Item) Detailing How State
Funds and Match or Other Funds are to be Expended - Multiple Programs Require Cost Breakdown for Each
Program - Eligible Budget Items
- Staff Costs Limited to Salary Benefits
33Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
- Eligible Budget Items (Continued)
- Administrative Overhead - Not to Exceed 10 of
Grant Amount Requested - Professional Services to Prepare RFP not Allowed
- Professional Services may be Used For Program
Implementation and Evaluation - Cost to Pay for Rent or Lease of Buildings for
Demonstration Grant Period
34Grant Application Highlights - Section 3
- Eligible Budget Items (Continued)
- Costs to Pay for Direct Client Services by
Community Based Organizations as Part of the
Continuum of Care - Furniture Exceeding 1000 Must Have BOC Approval
- Must Demonstrate that Expenditure Represents
the Lowest Cost
35Grant Application Highlights - Section 4
- Strategy Committee is a Requirement of the
Statute - All Members Must be Identified in the Application
and the Board Of Supervisors Resolution - Client Member Organization not Required
36Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
- Narrative
- 1 Page Abstract Per Project or 1 Page Per Program
if Multiple Program Project - List Programs by
Importance - Complete a Research Design Summary Form for Each
Project
37Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
- History of Activities
- If no History of Programs With Mentally Ill
Offenders - Provide a History Past Efforts of
Program Design, Implementation, Management and
Success Collaborative, Multidisciplinary and
Innovative Approaches to Problem Solving and
Obtaining and Maximizing Funding
38Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
- Problem Statement
- Describe Current Condition of Local Justice
System - Proposed Project
- Describe Roles of Collaborative Agencies
- Description of Current or Planned Capacity to
Administer the Project
39Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
- Proposed Project (Continued)
- Describe Each Element of the Continuum of
Responses - Describe Your Basic Research Design for Each
Program - A Process and Outcome Evaluation Must
be Conducted - Delineate Relationship Between Needs of the Local
Plan and the Demonstration Project
40Grant Application Highlights - Section 5
- Proposed Project (Continued)
- Anticipated Cost Effectiveness of the Proposed
Project - How will the Project be Supported After State
Funding Ends
41Grant Application Highlights - Section 6
- Board of Supervisors Resolution must be Submitted
with the Demonstration Grant Application.
42Evaluation And Award Timelines
- March 10 - 17, 1999 - BOC Staff to Review
Demonstration Grant Evaluations and Prepare
Worksheets for with Comments for Consideration by
the ESC - Worksheets will be Sent to Applicant Counties by
April 2, 1999
43Evaluation And Award Timelines
- March 18 - April 14, 1999 - The ESC will Complete
Initial Review and Rating for Eligible Grant
Applications Received - April 14 - 16, 1999
- ESC will Receive County Comments
- Schedule Based Upon Time Proposals Received
- ESC will Meet in Executive Session for Final
Review
44Evaluation And Award Timelines
- May 20, 1999 - ESC will Present Recommendation
for Grant Awards to The BOC - All Planning Invoices Due to BOC by June 30, 1999
- Counties will be Under Contract by July 1, 1999
45Board of Corrections
Phase II Mentally Ill Offender Crime
Reduction Demonstration Grant Criteria
46Grant Criteria Development
- Developed by the ESC
- MIOCRG Mission Serves as Guiding Principle
- To Select the Best Grant Proposals Designed to
Reduce Crime, Jail Crowding, Criminal Justice
Costs - Valid
- Fair
- Equitable
47Grant Criteria
- Technical Compliance
- Match Funding
- Weighted Criteria
48Technical Criteria
- BOC Staff will Review Grant Applications for
Completeness - Ensure Applications Contain all Required Elements
- Rating is Pass/Fail
- Will Provide Worksheet with Recommendations to
ESC and Copy to Applicant
49Match Funding
- 25 Match is Required
- Can be Hard or In-Kind
- Match Less than 25 Fail
- 25 Match Pass
- Match 26-35 1 Point
- Match 36-45 2 Points
- Match 46-55 3 Points
50Weighted Criteria
- Bidders History of Past Efforts - 12 Points
- Need for the Program - 15 Points
- Collaborative, Multi-Agency, Multi-Disciplinary -
15 Points - Probability of Success - 10 Points
- Evaluation Design - 12 Points
- Likelihood that Program will Continue - 10 Points