Iowa Professional Development Model Seminar III

1
Iowa Professional Development ModelSeminar III

• Pam Johnson
• Margaret Van Fossen

2

1. AGENDA (9 AM noon and no lunch)
2. HOUSEKEEPING
3. OBJECTIVES

3
OBJECTIVES

• Participants will
• Understand formative and summative data
  collection
• Become familiar with various collaborative
  structures
• Examine a variety of resources to assist in
  designing professional development
• Connect the IPDM process to the Big Picture

4
(No Transcript)
5
WELCOME

• Taking care of business
• Please set cell phones so they dont ring.
• Participate/share with others.
• Use the Parking Lot to record questions you would
  like to have answered.
• Evaluation forms

6
THE DE PERSPECTIVE

• Deb Hansen
• Teacher Quality
• Iowa Department of Education

7
Collaboration To Improve Teacher Practice

• Shelley Frost

8
A COLLABORATIVE CULTURE

• Ken Krumwiede
• Myrna Miller

9
BREAK
10
PARKING LOT
11
Collaboration To Improve Teacher Practice

• Linda Mannhardt Williams Intermediate School
• Joe Jarvis Northeast High School
• Tim Wernentin Wood Intermediate School

12
READING FIRST

• Donna Wood
• Quality Learning Consultant

13
FORMS and HANDOUTS

• Notebook materials
• Extra hand-outs

14
AEA OFFERINGS

• AEA Media
• Options for professional development

15
The BIG PICTURE

• Dr. Kristine Wolzen
• Director
• General Education

16
Conclusion

• Review the seminars objectives.
• Participants will
• 1. Recognize the capacity of well designed and
  fully implemented professional development to
  accelerate student achievement gains.
• 2. Be able to describe the intent of the Teacher
  Quality Program and the purposes of the Iowa
  Professional Development Model.

17
Conclusion

• 3. Know the requirements of the Teacher Quality
  Program and rules related to professional
  development including district career development
  plans and individual teacher plans
• 4. Be able to teach others about the components
  of the Iowa Professional Development Model
• 5. Be able to design, implement, and evaluate
  professional development in their own districts.

18
Conclusion

• Credit
• Evaluation forms