Fundamental Question - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 73
About This Presentation
Title:

Fundamental Question

Description:

Based on observation of what an organism does. ... 1938 -- B.F. Skinner explains instrumental or operant conditioning ... ( Jane Goodall's work with chimps) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: wally
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fundamental Question


1
Fundamental Question
  • What is the relationship between the organism and
    the environment?
  • Stated as Nature vs.. Nurture. Is behavior (or
    mental processes) mostly a function of biology or
    learning?
  • The different approaches (perspectives) of
    Psychology reflect different ways to answer this
    question.

2
Perspectives
  • Biological
  • Behavioral
  • Cognitive
  • Social
  • Psychoanalytic

3
The Biological Perspective
  • Behavior and mental processes are best understood
    by understanding the underlying biological
    functions and systems.
  • Includes what your text refers to as the
    Neuroscience, Evolutionary, and behavioral
    genetics perspectives

4
The Behavioral Perspective
  • Behavior and mental processes are best understood
    as a product of what the organism has learned
    through interaction with the environment.
  • Environment includes both
  • the physical environment and
  • the social environment

5
The Cognitive Perspective
  • Behavior and mental processes are a function of
    the way the brain and nervous system organize,
    recall, and process information.
  • Subject to the rules of biology and learning, but
    able to solve problems, experience emotions,
    develop new relationships, behave creatively,
    etc.
  • Cognito ergo sum.

6
The Social-Cultural Perspective
  • Behavior and mental processes are a product of
    the interactions between individuals and groups
    and vary across situations and cultures.
  • Closely related to sister disciplines of
    anthropology, sociology, history.

7
The Psychoanalytic Perspective
  • more or less obsolete in scientific Psychology
  • a precursor of cognitive psychology
  • behavior and mental processes are, in part, the
    product of unconscious cognitive processes which
    motivate and control behavior.
  • Tied to the theoretical and applied work of
    Sigmund Freud.

8
Perspectives in Perspective
  • none are completely right, all are partly right.
  • Contradictions are more apparent than real
  • The greatest gains in understanding result from
    the integration of multiple perspectives.

9
A (brief) History of Psychology
  • 1875 -- First Psychology course taught by
    William James at Harvard
  • 1879 -- First Experimental Psychology Lab
    established by Wilhelm Wundt, Leipzig, Germany
  • 1898 -- William James publishes Principles of
    Psychology
  • 1900 -- Sigmund Freud publishes The
    Interpretation of Dreams

10
1906 -- Ivan Pavlov reports his research on
classical conditioning.
  • 1913 -- John Watson makes Behaviorism the
    dominant force in Psychology
  • 1938 -- B.F. Skinner explains instrumental or
    operant conditioning
  • 1959 -- Carl Rogers describes a counseling
    theory based on Humanistic principles
  • 1988 -- Multiple journals acknowledge Cognitive
    studies as legitimate.

11
Specialization in Psychology
  • http//apa.org

12
Research Methods in Psychology
  • The five steps of the Scientific Method
  • 1. Observation
  • 2. Definition
  • 3. Hypothesis building
  • 4. Gathering evidence/testing the hypothesis
  • 5. Theory building

13
The order isnt absolute
  • This is a cyclic process -- you can start at any
    step and move to the others.
  • The goal is to objectively support or reject the
    hypothesis and/or theory
  • Theory should tie multiple observations together.

14
Falsification and theory building
  • Good theory must be developed in ways that they
    can be tested -- proven true or false.
  • Forces rejection of theories based on unproven
    and unprovable interventions
  • the 2001 or Chariot of the Gods theory of alien
    intervention
  • Creationist Science

15
Specific methods used in Psychological Research
  • case studies
  • surveys
  • observational studies
  • correlation studies
  • experimentation

16
Case Studies
  • An in-depth study of an individual, group, or
    situation.
  • Clinical assessments of individuals in treatment
  • Information movement in a company or agency

17
Case Study Strengths
  • Very specific
  • Highly detailed
  • Good internal validity
  • May trigger other kinds of investigations

18
Case Study Weaknesses
  • Case may be atypical and misleading (Freuds
    Viennese neurotics)
  • Anecdotal cases may overwhelm general truths.
    (Psychological effects of abortion)
  • May over-rely on memory
  • Given a thimbleful of dramatic facts we rush to
    make generalizations as large as a tub. Gordon
    Allport

19
Surveys
  • Asking people questions to develop a picture of
    there general attitudes, beliefs or behaviors.
  • Marketing research (NWCs recent efforts)
  • Political polling
  • Sexual attitudes and behaviors

20
Survey Methods
  • Mail surveys
  • Open ended interviews
  • Questionnaires
  • Telephone interviews
  • They share the existence of a list of questions
    that are asked of participants.

21
Questionnaire Problems - 1
  • Difficulty in developing truly neutral questions.
  • Texts example of not allowing vs..
    forbidding or censoring pornography or
    cigarette ads
  • Would your rather increase defense spending or
    give the country to the godless Communists?

22
Questionnaire Problems - 2
  • Limits to what people can accurately remember.
  • What was your total gross income from all
    sources during fiscal 1996?
  • How old were you when you had your first sexual
    fantasy?

23
Questionnaire Problems - 3
  • Social Desirability issues
  • How many times have you cheated on tests?
  • Do you ever masturbate?
  • How much alcohol do you drink every week?
  • Comparing survey results with trace observation
    results in the Oregon alcohol studies.
  • Validity questions in personality inventories
    like the MMPI

24
Sampling Problems
  • You cant ask everybody.
  • The answers you get depend on who you ask.
  • If you ask the wrong people, youll get a wrong
    answer.

25
Sampling Definitions 1
  • Population All the possible individuals in a
    group that could be surveyed.
  • US population, about 290 million.
  • NWC population, about 1200 full time equivalent
    students
  • Sample A smaller, more manageable group drawn
    from the population

26
Sampling Definitions 2
  • Random Sample A sample where every member of
    the population has an equal chance of being
    selected for participation.
  • Representative Sample A random sample that
    insures that relevant proportions of the
    populations are included.

27
Sampling Definitions 3
  • Sample of Convenience People who are handy for
    the researcher. Hence the huge number of studies
    done on students in General Psychology classes.
  • Expert Sample Asking only people who should
    know what they are talking about. Is it better
    to ask a group of prison wardens or a sample of
    the general public about prison crowding?

28
Sampling Bias
  • Social Desirability (aka courtesy bias)
  • Volunteer bias Is the sexual behavior of people
    who are willing to answer a lot of detailed
    questions about their sex lives the same as that
    of people who wont complete the survey?

29
Sample Size
  • Generally, large samples are more accurate than
    smaller samples
  • A point-of-diminishing-return exists, where
    larger size doesnt improve accuracy very much.
  • Random and representative sampling is more
    important than sample size -- the Hite Report
    vs. the Gallup Poll.

30
Observational Studies
  • Watching and recording the behavior of organisms
    in their natural environment.
  • Sub-types
  • naturalistic observation
  • participant observation
  • field experiments

31
Naturalistic Observations
  • Active observation and recording of behavior in a
    natural setting without influencing the
    situation. (Jane Goodalls work with chimps)
  • Provides descriptions of behavior only -- not
    explanation or cause-and-effect relationships.

32
Problems with Naturalistic Observations
  • Observer effects Subjects behavior changes when
    they know they are being watched. (Minimized by
    concealing the observer)
  • Observer bias Seeing/recording only what is
    expected. (Bloomers vs.. Non-Bloomers)

33
Participant Observations
  • The researcher overtly joins the group under
    observations with or without active
    participation.
  • Margaret Meads work with Tahitian villages
  • Hunter Thompsons study of the Hells Angels
  • Central Problem Does the participation of the
    observer change the observed behavior?

34
Field Experiments
  • The manipulation of some variable in an
    observational study to observe effects
  • Elevator riding at UW
  • Problem not enough control. You cant be sure
    that what you manipulated cause the change in
    behavior

35
Strengths and Weaknesses of Observational Studies
  • Uses the natural environment
  • Cant prove cause-and-effect

36
Ethics and Observational Studies
  • At what point does observation become an invasion
    of privacy?
  • Greeting behaviors on a NWC sidewalk
  • Humphrys (1970) tea-room trade study

37
Correlation Studies
  • Correlation A statistical measure of a
    relationship.
  • A measure of how two or more variables are linked
    together in an orderly way.
  • An indication of how one of the variables
    predicts the other variable(s).

38
Positive Correlation
  • An increase in one variable corresponds to an
    increase in the other.

39
Negative Correlation
  • An increase in one variable corresponds to a
    decrease in the other.

40
Coefficient of Correlation
  • The numbers that represent the strength and
    direction of a correlation.
  • 1 equals a perfect positive relationship
  • -1 equals a perfect negative relationship
  • 0 equals no relationship

41
Prediction
  • The closer the coefficient is to 1 in either
    direction, the stronger (more predictive) the
    relationship
  • -.79 is a stronger relationship than .34

42
Causation
  • Correlation is not causation.
  • Just because two variables are related to each
    other does not necessarily mean one causes the
    other.
  • Pots and pans are positively related to IQ (.83)

43
The Experiment
  • Psychologys preferred method of inquiry
  • Marked by
  • Control
  • Manipulation

44
Definitions
  • Types of Groups
  • Experimental
  • Control

45
Experimental Group
  • The group where you manipulate some variable

46
Control Group
  • The group were everything is the same except the
    variable manipulated in the experimental group.

47
Random Assignment
  • Putting subjects into either group by chance to
    minimize group differences

48
Variables
  • Independent
  • Dependent
  • Confounding or Intervening

49
Independent Variable
  • The variable manipulated by the experimenter

50
Dependent Variable
  • The result or outcome of manipulation of the
    independent variable

51
Confounding Variable
  • Something that was not predicted or accounted for
    in designing/conducting the experiment that
    confused the relationship between the independent
    and dependent variables.
  • The Hawthorne Effect
  • The APA Internet Isolation study

52
Operational Definitions
  • An exact definition of terms in relationship to a
    particular, specific study or experiment.
  • Student?
  • Aggression?
  • Attitude?

53
Advantages of experimental work
  • Establishes cause and effect relationships
  • Reduces or eliminates alternative explanations
  • Self-correcting through Replication

54
Limitations of experimental work
  • Efforts to control may create very artificial
    settings that may not validly reflect nature

55
Statistics
  • The language used in Psychology to communicate
    the results of research
  • A tool used to determine if observed differences
    are real and not the results of chance

56
Types of Statistics
  • Descriptive
  • Inferential

57
Descriptive Statistics
  • A summary of a group of quantifiable
    observations
  • A shorthand way to express how the observations
    were alike and different

58
Statistics of Central Tendency
  • Whats the typical score (observation) in a
    group of scores (observation)?
  • Specific statistics
  • Mean
  • Mode
  • Median

59
The Mean
  • The arithmetic average
  • Add up all the scores and divide by the number of
    scores

60
Mean math
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • __
  • 15 / 5 3

61
Problems with the mean
  • Easily influenced by the addition of a few
    extreme score
  • 5 20
  • 4 4
  • 3 3
  • 2 2
  • 1 1
  • __ ___
  • 15/5 3 30/5 6

62
The Median
  • The middle score in a distribution of scores
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

63
The Mode
  • The most frequently occurring score in a
    distribution of scores
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

64
Statistics of Variation
  • Central Tendency statistics tell how scores are
    alike. Variation statistics tell how they
    differ.
  • Range
  • Standard Deviation

65
Range
  • The gap between the highest and the lowest
    scores.
  • high score 80 minus the low score 20 means
    the Range 60.

66
The Standard Deviation
  • A numerical way to describe how scores are
    distributed above and below the mean
  • Gives the ability to express the distribution
    visually

67
The Normal (bell-shaped) curve
68
Skewed Distributions
  • Small Standard Deviation a tall, skinny bell.
  • Large Standard Deviation a short, fat bell.
  • Bi-modal Distributions more than one high point.

69
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS
  • Answers the questions
  • Could the differences between two groups have
    been caused by chance?
  • and
  • How confident can we be that we are right?

70
Stated as Statistical Significance
  • not about the importance of a difference, but
    that the difference is big enough to matter and
    not caused by some accidental difference between
    the groups,
  • t-test, ANOVA, etc.

71
Significance reported
  • stated as a Probability figure
  • Psychology generally uses the .05 level as
    standard (95) although some research is reported
    at the .1 (90) or .01 (99) level

72
Ethics in research
  • The effort to insure that participants (including
    animals) are protected from harm.

73
General Ethical Considerations
  • Primum est nocare First, do no harm.
  • Informed consent
  • Deception
  • Confidentiality
  • Debriefing/feedback
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com