An Introduction to the White Book - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

An Introduction to the White Book

Description:

Ray McLaughlin (T) MS-4. Rachel Paisley. Ryan Swain. Jessica Zarzour. Michael Gates (H) ... http://main.uab.edu/uasom/2/show.asp?durki=2201 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: kristina9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Introduction to the White Book


1
UASOMs Honor Council
An Introduction to the White Book
2
UASOMs Honor Council
3
Incident Reporting
4
Incident Reporting
You see or hear something
that just doesnt seem right
5
Incident Reporting
WITHIN 2 CLASS DAYS Contact 1 member of the
honor council
6
Incident Reporting The Honor Council
MS-4 Rachel Paisley Ryan Swain Jessica
Zarzour Michael Gates (H) Eric Law (T)
MS-2 Deidre Downs Paul Linsky Frank
Laughlin Rashi Singhal
MS-3 Jennifer Bryson Meredith Gault Grady
Maddox Benjamin Rogers (H) Ray McLaughlin (T)
MS-1 TBD
7
Incident Reporting
Provide the following 3 facts
8
Incident Reporting
  • JUST
  • Your name
  • Your Class
  • 3. The class of the Accused(s)

9
Incident Reporting
10
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
11
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
  • The Accuser knows his or her version of the
    story
  • ? Honor Council Representative knows
  • the Accusers name
  • the Accusers class
  • the Accuseds class (but not his or her identity)
  • ? on the Honor Council knows the
    Accuseds name

1
No One
12
Preliminary Investigation
13
Preliminary Investigation
An Honor Council Member is required to present a
report of any suspected violation to the Honor
Council Chair.
14
Preliminary Investigation
The Honor Council Chair appoints an Investigator
Honor Council Member Not a classmate of the
Accused Not an Honor Council Officer
15
Preliminary Investigation
The Investigator
  • Contacts the Accuser
  • Contacts the Accused
  • Contacts any Witnesses
  • Compiles a written report
  • WITHOUT NAMES

16
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
17
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
  • The Accuser knows his or her version of the
    story
  • The Accused knows that he or she is being
    investigated
  • ? (including the Chair) Honor Council
    Representatives know
  • the Accusers name
  • the Accusers class
  • the Accuseds class (but not his or her identity)
  • ? Honor Council Representative outside of the
    Accuseds
  • class knows pertinent information, including the
    Accuseds
  • identity investigator

2
1
18
Preliminary Hearing
19
Preliminary Hearing
The Preliminary Hearing is a closed proceeding
attended by
  • The 5 Preliminary Hearing Committee Members
  • The Trial Clerk (a Vice Chair)
  • The Investigator
  • The Honor Council Administrative Advisor

The 5 voting members of the committee are
the Chair and 1 member from each class
20
Preliminary Hearing
The Preliminary Hearing is conducted without the
Accuser or Accuseds names being revealed.
The Investigator presents the results of the
preliminary investigation but maintains
confidentiality.
21
Preliminary Hearing
The Preliminary Hearing Committee may
  • Dismiss the case
  • Request a more thorough investigation
  • Refer to other authorities (such as police)
  • Move to proceed with an Honor Court Trial

22
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
23
At this point WHO KNOWS WHAT ?
  • The Accuser knows his or her version of the
    story
  • The Accused knows that he or she is being
    investigated
  • ? (including the Chair) Honor Council
    Representatives know
  • the Accusers name
  • the Accusers class
  • the Accuseds class (but not his or her identity)
  • ? Honor Council Representative outside of the
    Accuseds
  • class knows pertinent information, including the
    Accuseds
  • identity
  • ?
    knows the Facts, but not identities

2
1
Preliminary Hearing Committee
24
The Honor Court
25
The Honor Court
The Jury 7 out of 20 randomly selected
students with representation from each class.
26
The Honor Court
Members of the Honor Council involved include
  • Both Vice Chairs
  • The original trial clerk and the other as the
    moderator
  • The presenter
  • who represents the Accuser
  • Possibly, advocates for the Accused
  • may also be chosen from student body

These individuals do not vote on the outcome
27
The Honor Court
  • The Jury
  • First, decides whether a violation has occurred
  • Then, decides an appropriate punishment subject
    to administrative approval

28
The SSMUD
Find an updated SSMUD at the Honor Councils
website.
http//main.uab.edu/uasom/2/show.asp?durki2201
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com