Intranet Project Briefing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Intranet Project Briefing

Description:

GP Position on GHG-calculation method. 60 ... GP position on other criteria. Impact on biodiversity ... criteria alone can never guarantee total sustainability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: martin549
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intranet Project Briefing


1
7/05 TABLE RONDE Agro- carburants, quelles
conditions?
2
(No Transcript)
3
Biomasse ? biomasse
4
(No Transcript)
5
GP Position on GHG-calculation method
  • 60
  • Displacement effects (leakage) must be included
    in calculation
  • Initial CO2-emissions from land-use change must
    be distributed over max 10 years
  • N-fertilizer use must be integrated in
    calculation (N2O 296 keer krachtiger dan CO2).
    Uncertainties exist cf. Crutzen et al.
  • ? Intergov. Panel needed to develop tool

6
GP position on other criteria
  • Impact on biodiversity (flora and fauna)?
  • Sust Agriculture minimal use of agrochemicals,
    water and soil conservation, sustainable
    harvesting, no GMO's (!)?
  • Social criteria should be included (food
    security, no undermining of livelihoods and land
    rights,...)?

7
Criteria Certification
  • criteria alone can never guarantee total
    sustainability
  • Limitations (e.g. Macro-economic effects)?
  • Criteria is only a first step, certification,
    accredition and monitoring are equally important
  • ? if not able to control certain products should
    be excluded

8
ex. RSPO
  • GP reports World's largest food, cosmetic and
    biofuel companies are driving destruction of
    Indonesia's reinforests and peatlands through
    growing palmoil consumption (RSPO members)?
  • UNEP palmoil plantations major cause of
    deforestation in Indonesia.
  • Unilever
  • President of RSPO
  • RSPO Criteria not strict enough
  • Failing to apply and enforce RSPO prinicples and
    criteria

9
Conclusion
  • Real solution is an energy revolution (energy
    efficiency)?

10
(No Transcript)
11
conclusion
  • First generation very problematic from a climate
    point of view and from an ethical point of view.
    Proposed sust. Criteria do not provide a good
    enough answer
  • ? drop the 10 (UN, EEA,...) / support
    moratorium until real sust criteria for ALL
    biomass are developped.
  • Second generation (algae, cellulose ethanol,
    PPO) invest in RD positive perspectives BUT
    not without risks either (GE,...).

12
literature
  • MNP (Dutch Environmental Assessment Agency, Local
    and globa consequences of the EU renewable
    directive for biofuels, Bilthoven, March 2008)?
  • Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases
    Greenhouse Gases through Emissions from Land Use
    Change. Timothy Searchinger et al.,
    Science,February 2008
  • Joint Research Centre of the European
    Commission, Biofuels in the Europeancontext
    facts, uncertainties and recommendations. JRC
    Working Paper,
  • OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development,
    Biofuels is the cure worse than the disease?
    Richard Doornbosch and Ronald Steenblik, Paris,
    September 2007

13
Merci! karen.Janssens_at_be.greenpeace.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com