TMS: Organizational Learning (plus a bit of CI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TMS: Organizational Learning (plus a bit of CI

Description:

... the learning organisation, a dominate lifestyle involving all in organisation. ... Life cycle costs, not front end costs. Management must be involved and lead. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: francesj
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TMS: Organizational Learning (plus a bit of CI


1
TMS Organizational Learning (plus a bit of CI
TQM thrown in)
  • Frances Jørgensen
  • frances_at_plan.aau.dk

2
Organizational Learning
  • What do we mean by organizational learning?
    The Learning Organization? Why the interest in
    organizational learning? What has organizational
    learning to do with your projects? How do we
    measure organizational learning? What are some of
    the challenges to creating a Learning
    Organization and/or for establishing
    Organizational Learning?
  • Learning objective for the student to gain an
    basic understanding of organizational learning
    from theoretical and practical perspectives,
    especially in terms of how these relate to
    organizational structure, systems, and processes.

3
What do we mean by Organizational Learning?
  • How can an organization learn?
  • Individual learning?
  • Group learning?
  • More?
  • How do we know that an organization has learned?

4
Learning as Change
  • Arygris and Schön (1978) a process of detecting
    and correcting error (behavioral, observable,
    measurable).
  • Probst and Büchel (1997) the process by which
    the knowledge and value base changes, leading to
    better problem-solving and capacity for action
    (cognitive with expectation of behavioral
    changes)
  • Friedlander (1983) also changes that lead to new
    insights and understanding

5
Learning Cyclesfrom individual to group to
organization?
PDCA Cycle
6
Levels of Organizational Learning
  • Single-loop learning following present
    rules/policies to achieve present objectives
    (Arygris, C. and Schön, D. Organizational
    Learning, Reading, Mass Addison-Wesley).
  • Double-loop learning modification of
    rules/policies to achieve new objectives (ibid)
  • Deutero-learning learning from learning
    (Bateson,1973)

7
How do we know if/when an organization has
learned?
  • Learning as a result learning has occurred if
    there is improvement of results
  • Learning as a process routines change as a
    result of accumulated experiences

8
An Organization Memory
  • Experience from learning processes are stored in
    the organizations memoryroutines, norms,
    procedures, beliefs, stories, strategies, and
    technology.
  • Experiences can also go against formal routines
    and procedures.
  • Experiences are transferred through
    socialization, education, imitation, transfer of
    personnel, mergers, acquisitions, etc.
  • Experiences can survive after those involved
    leave the company new employees may follow the
    routines developed from experience but often lack
    the background on which those routines were
    based.

9
Eleven Characteristics of the Learning Company
  • A Learning Approach to Strategy
  • Participative Policy Making
  • Informating
  • Formative Accounting and Control
  • Internal Exchange
  • Reward Flexibility
  • Enabling Structure
  • Boundary Workers as Environmental Scanners
  • Inter-company Learning
  • A Learning Climate
  • Self-Development Opportunities for All
  • (Pedler, Burgoyne, and Boydell, 1997)

10
A Learning Organization needs
  • Systematic problem solving
  • Experimentation with new approaches
  • Learning from past experiences
  • Learning from the experiences and best practices
    of others
  • Transferring knowledge quickly and effectively
    through the organization
  • (Garvin, 1993)

11
Continuous Improvement
  • is defined as
  • ...the planned, organized and systematic process
    of on-going, incremental and company-wide change
    of existing practice aimed at improving company
    performance (Boer et al., 2000).
  • is based on
  • Continuous development learning
  • Full utilization of employee potential
  • Employee responsibility for improvement

12
(No Transcript)
13
Kaizen (Imai, 1986)
  • Kaizen
  • Process-oriented results can only be improved if
    processes are improved
  • People-oriented based on the belief that
    peoples natural desire for quality and value,
    and that it will pay for itself in the long run.
  • Standard-oriented standards are required in
    order for improvement to occur.

14
What is it all about?
Its really very simple! Basically, when you have
done something, think about what has been done
and try to do it better the next time!
15
  • 1 technician from each of 4 teams goes to the
    managers office at least once each day
  • Accounting
  • workdays i 1997 230 days
  • Distance to office 2x90 180 m there and back
  • 4180230 165.600 m 165 km
  • Conclusion
  • If these trips are cut by just one ½, 83 km
    walking is saved.
  • What about coordinating the teams? What about
    another form of communication?

16
Balancing Radical Change CI
continuous improvement
Practice or performance standard
maintenance
continuously improved practice or performance
standard
radical innovation
maintained practice or performance standard
practice or performance standard development
without maintenance
radical innovation
Time
Kilde Imai, 1986
17
Kaizen/Innovation Comparison (Cole, R., CI2000
Conference, Aalborg)
18
Kaizen/Innovation Comparison (contd)
INNOVATION
KAIZEN
FEATURES
Maintenance Improvement
Scrap and Rebuild
Mode
Spark
Tech breakthrough
Conventional know how
Requires great investment, little maintenance
Requires little investment, lots maintenance
Practical Requirements
People
Effort Focus
Technology
Evaluation Criteria
Process focus
Results focus
Works well in slow growth economy
Suited to fast growth economy
Advantage
19
  • The Maturity Model
  • Natural CI No formal CI structure,
    problem-solving is seldom often conducted by
    specialists.
  • Systematic CI Formal attempts at creating,
    supporting, and maintaining CI formal
    problem-solving procedures are used and supported
    by basic CI tools. CI often run parallel to work
    processes.
  • Goal-oriented CI In addition to above, formal
    diffusion and application of strategic goals,
    with monitoring measuring of CI in relation to
    these goals.
  • Pro-active/self-driven CI In addition to above,
    with the responsibility for CI being assumed by
    the problem-solving units themselves (department,
    groups, etc.)
  • Strategic CI Full implementationthe learning
    organisation, a dominate lifestyle involving all
    in organisation. Active learning occurs naturally
    and is shared automatically. Combined large
    small innovations

20
Key Aspects of CI
  • Suggestions, support of recognition, pay, and
    educational systems
  • Application of production techniques
    quality-related management methods, tools, and
    techniques.
  • Individual group-based contribution (within and
    across functions)
  • Not obligatory or volunteer rather, normal,
    daily activities.
  • Organization-wide support involvement
    (production, management, departments e.g.
    product/process development)

21
Key aspects of CI (contd)
  • Top down / bottom up planned, strategy driven
    and emergent contributions to strategy
    development.
  • Various levels of integration between action and
    reflection PDCA cycle (problem
    identification/solution proposals in Japan/USA)
    full ownership of entire cycle (analysis,
    solutions, implementation in Scandinavia).
  • Encourage individual organizational learning as
    part of daily activities
  • Numerous projects occurring simultaneously not
    hit and miss
  • Not just in production moving into service areas
  • Not just internal processes moving into supply
    chain and networks

22
Benefits of CI
  • Small improvements in quality, costs, delivery
    time, safety, job improvement, etc.
  • Establishes foundation for other (larger)
    improvements (i.e. radical changes)
  • Maintenance improvement of larger changes (e.g.
    Lego maintenance of BPR project results)
  • Development of competencies, learning,
    self-management (e.g. Coloplast autonomous teams)

23
Plan Do Check Act
Planning and preparation, based on an analysis of
existing practices and performance Plan
Act The new practices are standardized but
opportunities for further improvement remain open

Do Implementation of the plan
Check Check whether changes have resulted in
expected improvements
24
(No Transcript)
25
TQM
  • A change in organizations technology (way of
    doing work), in the organization's culture (its
    norms, values, and belief systems), and a change
    in an organization's political system (decision
    making processes and power bases), with the
    objective of satisfying internal and external
    customers and suppliers .
  • Significant changes cannot be expected unless all
    of these dimensions are aligned. TQM implemented
    as simply technological change will not be
    successful (Tichey, 1983).

26
TQM
Total Quality involves everyone and all
activities in the company. Quality Conformance
to Requirements (Meeting Customer Requirements).
Management Quality can and must be managed.
TQM A process for managing quality it must
be a continuous way of life a philosophy of
perpetual improvement in everything we do.
27
Principles of TQM
  • Quality can and must be managed.
  • Everyone has a customer and is a supplier.
  • Processes, not people are the problem.
  • Every employee is responsible for quality.
  • Problems must be prevented, not just fixed.
  • Quality must be measured.
  • Quality improvements must be continuous.
  • The quality standard is defect free.
  • Goals are based on requirements, not negotiated.
  • Life cycle costs, not front end costs.
  • Management must be involved and lead.
  • Plan and organize for quality improvement.

28
Implementing TQM
  • A first step in TQM implementation involves
    assessing
  • the current state of the organization (history,
    needs,
  • preconditions, factors leading to decision to
    adopt
  • TQM, and employee relationships).
  • One method of conducting this assessment is the
  • force field analysis

29
Sample Force Field Analysis

DRIVING FORCES RESTRAINING FORCES
Environmental pressures leading to reduced funds Middle management fear of loss of control
Staff who may like to be more involved in agency decision making Lack of time for line workers to take time for TQM meetings
Successful applications of TQM elsewhere Skepticism based on the organization's poor performance regarding change
30
Process management and improvement
  • Define the process
  • Measure process performance (metrics)
  • Review process performance
  • Identify process shortcomings
  • Analyze process problems
  • Make a process change
  • Measure the effects of the process change
  • Communicate effects to all parties

31
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com