Anti-scholarship

1
Anti-scholarship
2

• Against many of our habits of thought, our world
  is dominated by the extreme, the unknown, and the
  very improbable (improbable according to our
  current knowledge)and all the while we spend our
  time engaged in small talk, focusing on the
  known, and the repeated and repeatable.

3
Consider the following, with respect to a 2-D
rendition of the Klein-bottle
4
In other words, we tune in on the containing
and the contained
5
The uncontained is a vast ocean of Chaos, OF
UNKNOWING, and the containing and contained are
minuscule islands, OF KNOWING
6

• This implies the need to use the extreme, the
  unorthodox, the strange, the bizarre, event as a
  starting point and not treat it as an exception
  to be pushed under the rug.

7

• In spite of our progress and the growth of
  knowledge, or perhaps because of such progress
  and growth, the future will be increasingly less
  predictable, while both human nature and social
  science seem to conspire to hide the idea from
  us.

8

• Students and colleagues enter my humble office,
  and remark What a library you have! How many
  of these books have you read?

9

• We tend to treat our knowledge as personal
  property to be protected and defended. It is an
  ornament that allows us to rise in the pecking
  order. Thus we have the largest library our
  financial means will allow, and thus also, the
  portion of the books in our library weve read is
  usually roughly inversely proportional to our
  financial means.

10

• But Assuming youve read all your books, the
  library should be an indicator of what you dont
  know, more than of what you know.

11

• But in this case, youre an anti-scholar, since
  whatever your paltry knowing may be, you consider
  it neither your possession nor your treasure.
  Youre on the margin, a fringer, an outlier,
  rather than a conventional scholar.

12

• And where is this fringe at its best?
  Metaphorically speaking, at the hole in the
  Klein-bottle, where the containing containing the
  contained allows the uncontained to pour in.
  That is where the action is at.

13
The 'fringe', where everything is what it isn't
and it is neither what it is nor what it isn't
14
But the 'fringe' is usually ignored. This creates
the conundrum of unknowing knowing. Which
includes
15

• 1. The illusion (presumption) of understanding
  (or how everyone thinks s/he knows).
• This can be qualified as the PRESENT, included
  within Peirces category FIRSTNESS

16

• 2. The retrospective construction, or how we
  assess matters after the fact, as if they were a
  rearview mirror.
• This can be qualified as the PAST, included
  within Peirces SECONDNESS.

17

• 3. The overvaluation of factual information to
  guide properly unlearned learned people,
  especially when they construct general categories
  with which to organize the world.
• This can be qualified as the FUTURE, included
  within THIRDNESS.