Clock Buffer Polarity Assignment for Power Noise Reduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Clock Buffer Polarity Assignment for Power Noise Reduction

Description:

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Texas A&M University. 2 ... Previous Work... The circuit was synthesized and technology mapped using SIS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ash778
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clock Buffer Polarity Assignment for Power Noise Reduction


1
Clock Buffer Polarity Assignment for Power Noise
Reduction
  • Rupak Samanta, Ganesh Venkataraman and Jiang Hu
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
  • Texas AM University

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • Problem Description
  • Polarity Assignment Algorithm
  • Buffer-type Selection and Post Processing
  • Results and Summary

3
Introduction
  • Power/Ground noise is a major source of VLSI
    Circuit timing variation
  • 10 power noise may cause 29 inverter delay
    variation in 45nm technology (S.Sapatnekar et.al,
    IEEE Design and Test 2003)
  • A main culprit of power noise is the clock
    network
  • Buffers in the clock tree switch simultaneously,
    thereby induce power/ground noise
  • It is imperative to separate the simultaneous
    switching of clock buffers
  • We have proposed a fine-grain signal polarity
    assignment of clock buffers

4
Previous Work on Buffer Signal polarity Assignment
  • Y.-T.Neih et.al, Minimizing Peak Current via
    Opposite-Phase Clock TreeDAC05

5
Previous Work
  • Both signal polarities can be accommodated by
    using different types of Flip-Flops

6
Limitation Local Power Noise reduction
  • The approach faces dilemma in two scenarios

7
Impact to Delay Variation
(b)
(a)
(c)
8
Delay Variation
  • According to L. H. Chen et.al, Buffer delay
    change in presence of power and ground
    noiseTVLSI03
  • A,B, C, D are gt 0
  • Case (a) has more rising delay increase and less
    falling delay increase
  • Case (b) has less rising delay and more falling
    delay increase
  • Case (c) has common mode noise zero, thus there
    is less increase in delay variation.
  • Thus clock buffer polarity assignment can reduce
    the delay variation

9
Problem Description
  • Given a buffered clock tree with n buffers
  • Objective Assign either positive or negative
    signal polarity to each buffer
  • The difference in number of positive buffers and
    the number of negative buffers is no greater than
    1 in a local region
  • We have used 3 different Algorithms
  • Partitioning
  • 2-Coloring of Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)
  • Recursive Min-Matching

10
Polarity Assignment Algorithms
11
Technique 1 Partitioning
  • A graph G (V,E) is formed out the buffered
    clock tree
  • The buffers form the nodes of the graph
  • Edge weight is defined the distance between two
    nodes

V-
V
V
V-
Bi-partition Algorithm
V
V-
  • V and V- corresponds to positive and negative
    polarities
  • We have and
  • The two nodes with small edge weight are more
    likely to be in two different sets

12
Technique 2 2-Coloring of MST
V-
V
Find Minimum weighted edge
V-
V-
V
V
V
V-
V-
V-
V
13
Technique 3 Recursive Min-Matching
V-
V
V
V-
Min-matching Algorithm
V-
V
V-
V
Min-matching Algorithm
V-
V-
V
V-
V
V
V
V-
V
V-
14
Buffer Type Selection and Post Processing
15
Buffer Type Selection
  • We need to chose either inverting or
    non-inverting type for each clock buffer

Clock Source
V
V-
V
V-
V
V
V-
Positive Edge-triggered FF
Positive Edge-triggered FF
Negative Edge-triggered FF
16
Buffer Type Matching
Clock Source
Non-Inverting Buffer
Clock sink (flip-flop)
  • The buffer type matching is done on a pair of
    sequentially adjacent (SA) FFs i and j at a time
  • Two FFs are sequentially adjacent if there exists
    a combinational path between them
  • Mismatch score that is sum of products of
    criticality and number of mismatched buffers
    between each sink pairs
  • Criticality depends upon the timing constraint
    and distance between respective pairs of FFs

17
Buffer Type Matching contd..
Calculate MismatchScore(MS_G)
Chose the most critical sink pairs
No
Find the mismatch buffer types
Calculate MismatchScore(MS_U)
No
If MS_U lt MS_G MS_G MS_U, Valid Swap
Correct the polarity of downstream buffers
No Valid swap, EXIT
STOP
18
Clock Skew Tuning
  • Clock skew is changed due to change in buffer
    type in polarity assignment
  • The tuning procedure is same as in, G.
    Venkataraman et.al, ICCAD05
  • Dummy capacitors are added to the buffers and
    are tuned towards desired clock skew

Dummy Cap
19
Results and Summary
20
Experimental Set-up
  • The proposed procedure was implemented in C in an
    Windows environment having a 1GB RAM
  • The initial clock trees were obtained using
    ISCAS89 benchmarks
  • The circuit was synthesized and technology mapped
    using SIS
  • The position of clock sinks were obtained in mPL.
    The clock tree was generated using G.
    Venkataraman et.al, ICCAD05
  • We used 180nm technology file

21
Peak Current
22
Power Noise
23
Delay Variation
24
Result Discussion
  • The reduction in peak current is significant
    38-44
  • The power supply noise variation come down by
    44-50
  • The delay variation reduction is 50-54. For one
    benchmark the 2-Coloring algorithm led to a
    reduction in delay variation of 75
  • The skew for the three different algorithms are
    reduced to the base case
  • The run time of the three approaches are in few
    seconds
  • Thus our technique offers the flexibility of
    trying all three approaches and pick the one that
    offers best result

25
Summary
  • Contribution
  • Proposed techniques to reduce the clock network
    induced power supply noise by assigning different
    polarities to clock buffers in existing clock
    tree
  • Three different algorithms were detailed for the
    same problem
  • Buffer type matching and clock skew tuning was
    carried out as a post processing step
  • Conclusion
  • Experimental results indicate significant
    reduction in peak current, power supply noise and
    delay variation
  • Such reductions in peak current and delay
    variation lead to more robust circuit

26
Thanks!
Questions ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com