Title: Project sponsorship and community learning
1Project sponsorship and community learning
- Professor Rachel Parker
- Faculty of Business
2Project sponsors communicate
- Shared expectations
- Frequency of meetings
- Nature and extent of feedback (ongoing)
- Goals and timelines for thesis tasks (ongoing)
- Developmental opportunities (conferences,
publishing) - Principles of co-authorship
- Skills gaps and training opportunities
3Project sponsors provides structure in the early
stages
- Assistance with reading focused, productive
- Development of skills in analysis and synthesis
- Clarifying topic fit with expertise and research
strengths
4Project sponsors provide feedback
- Substantive advice on theory (causal
explanations) and method - Advice on writing
- How to structure a thesis
- How to write for different outlets (journals)
- Advice on oral presentations
- Deep and timely
- Written
5Project sponsors monitor progress
- Regular meetings
- Timelines observed
- Use annual reports
- Monitor not just thesis progress but capabilities
development - Confront impediments (personal problems)
6Project sponsors can provide access to a
community context for learning
- Central role of supervisor as expert in
traditional model - Expectations of supervision are too high?
- An open / community approach to learning as a
means of supplementing the student-supervisor
relationship
7Case study 1APAI
- CI of large ARC linkage project
- Two PhDs focused on different aspects of topic
- PhDs work as RAs conducting research at industry
partner offices - Cross-institutional supervision
- Regular independent student meetings
- Regular workshops with industry partners
- Regular project meetings
- Each student is engaged in coursework methods
training has a conference/publishing plan
8Advantages of Case Study 1
- Integration (with current work of supervisors)
- Students learn in multiple sites
- 2 universities
- 3 industry partners
- Project workshops
- Project meetings
- Academic conferences
- Coursework training
- Project team (including academics RAs)
- Student cohort
9Case study 2A scholarly writing group
- Learn about writing through its practice in a
group context - Groups of 4 meeting fortnightly over 12 weeks
- Work on scholarly writing project
- Self-identify project and deadlines
- Maintain reflective journal
- Review each others work
- Receive feedback and discuss response
- Incorporate feedback
10Case Study 2 Weekly Program
- Meeting 1 rules agreed (including
confidentiality, commitment), readings journal
distributed - Meeting 2 reflections on features of good
scholarly writing, themselves as scholarly
writers - Meeting 3 evaluating scholarly writing
generation of criteria for different types - Meeting 4 progress on projects, problems
- Meeting 5 workshop on giving and receiving
feedback (expectations and fears) - Meeting 6 discussion of insights gained from
reviewers comments and the way comments would be
incorporated
11Case Study 2Advantages and problems
- Participants reported positive characteristics of
program were shared experience, confidence
building, reduced isolation and solitude,
improved networks - Participants reported having learned about
writing from both giving and receiving feedback - Limitation many participants were undecided as
to whether program improved their writing
possibly because of short time frame of program
indicating need for further learning opportunities
12Discussion questions
- How would you change your current supervision
practice if you were to approach supervision as a
project sponsor? - How can you better integrate postgraduate
research students into your current and future
research agenda? - Can you identify the range of learning sites from
which your postgraduate students acquire skills
and knowledge? - If you were a project sponsor, adopting a
community approach to learning, how would you
approach the following supervision tasks - Helping students to complete within 3-4 years?
- Helping students to become independent
researchers?
13Learning sites
- Places
- University, industry (research partner, hospital,
school) - People
- Peer groups (postgraduate research seminars,
learning groups) - Other academics (academic seminars)
- Professional or industry partners
- Contexts
- Coursework training
- Academic or professional conferences, workshops,
seminars
14Community approach to learning completion and
independence
- Diffusion of authority from teacher to group
engage in practice, reflect on practice - Completion
- Problem solving peer group to address obstacles
to progress (including motivation) - Independence
- Participation in practice research assistance,
tutoring, seminar presentations - Participation in community academics,
experienced researchers, peers