Title: MIG MLAANZ Seminar Series
1The Innocent Stevedore(or how I came to better
understand the Waterfront)
- MIG MLAANZ Seminar Series
- Sydney
February 2007
2Agenda
- Introduction
- Seminar objective
- Why the Innocent Stevedore?
- Australian Stevedoring context
- The Transport Logistics Chain
- Principal locations
- Service providers
- Industry issues
- Stevedoring risk management key issues
- Legal considerations for stevedores
- Summary
- QA
Source Patrick Terminals
3But first another great claim
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Introduction Seminar objective
- Objectives
- To understand legal claims in the context of
Australian stevedoring industry - Opportunities to reduce claims involving the
waterfront
11Introduction Why the Innocent Stevedore?
- Fact or fiction - does the Innocent Stevedore
exist? - Stevedores place in transport/logistics chain
exposes them to a variety of risks, many (not
all) beyond their control. - Demands of transport/logistics chain require
stevedores to invest heavily in - Capital equipment
- Technology
- Facilities
- Trained labour
- Procedures
- Customer demands drive stevedoring efficiency,
costs and reliability - Stevedores requirement to balance these demands
with safety and vessel/cargo care considerations - Stevedores may not be (quite) perfect, but above
factors combine to require stevedores to invest
heavily in risk management strategies to avoid
WCI and vessel/cargo damage claims
12 2. The Australian Stevedoring Industry
context - the Transport/Logistics Chain
Source Sydney Ports Handbook, March 1995
132. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
principal locations
Source PO Ports Ltd
142. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
A. General Stevedoring Operators Port coverage
summary
152. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
B. Terminal Operators equipment overview
Approx estimated replacement value AUD 715M
Sources Various
162. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
B. Terminal Operators 2004/05 2006/06 5 Port
Performance Indicator Summary
172. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
B. Terminal Operators the future outlook
Source BTRA Working Paper 65 Container Ship
Movements through Australian Ports 2004/05 to
2024/25 (08/2005)
- Australias total containerised trade
- increased by 8 over the past 5 years
- is forecast to grow over next 20 years by 5.4
pa (from 5.2M TEUs to 14.9M TEUs in 2024/25
(286) -
182. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
B. Terminal Operators the port interface
- Transport/logistics chain
- efficiency driven by
- player interfaces
- distance
- location
- mode
- The more interfaces, the more risk
- Stevedores rely on performance of other players
Source SPC Handbook 2006
192. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
C. Industry issues
- Performance
- Reduce vessel turnaround time
- berthing windows, minimise restows,
- increased equipment cranes, straddles,
- improved technology (terminal management systems,
automated yard equipment)
- Reduce truck turnaround time
- Match RD shifts to vessel working shifts
- Improved technology processing (1Stop VBS,
PRAs) - Improved terminal handling (efficient terminal
layouts, new equipment)
- Maintain labour productivity
- Bonus vs OHS/WCI
- Training, career opportunities
202. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
C. Industry issues
- Competition
- Reduce costs/increased efficiency?
- increased investment/labour, same throughput
- interface coordination (ships/terminal/trucks/trai
n/cargo owners)
Source Patrick Terminals
212. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
C. Industry issues
- Future development
- Terminals
- Reduced berthing windows/
- larger vessels
- Improved stack density
- Improved road/rail interface
- Port land cost
- Road/rail
- Increase rail capacity to 40 total
- landside exchange
- Adequacy of track and road access
- Intermodal/inland terminal development
- Landbridging options East/West,
- Melbourne/Brisbane
Source Patrick Terminals
222. The Australian Stevedoring Industry context -
Australian stevedoring service providers
C. Industry issues
- Port Security
- Terrorism legislation
- Vessel/Terminal/cargo security/access
- Increased regulation surveillance/disclosure
233. Stevedoring risk management - key issues
- Managing the waterfront player mix operational
services - Vessels, terminal, trucks, trains, cargo owners
operating rules - Berthing windows
- VBS
- Rail windows
- PRAs
- Vessels fit for purpose
- Labour productivity vs safety
- Cargo care security, safety (hazardous
cargoes/DGs) - Data vessel stow plans, manifests, cargo
documentation accurate timely provision - Storage minimising terminal congestion
- RD reasonable cargo cutoffs
244. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Customer warranties
- Is owner/authorised agent of vessel/container/good
s?
- Has customer accurately fully described
goods/containers provided all necessary
info/instructions re handling/care control
having regard to their nature?
- Do goods/containers/vessel comply with all
applicable laws will customer provide stevedore
with all assistance to enable compliance?
254. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Customer warranties
- Are goods packed to withstand ordinary risks of
stevedoring? - Are customer vessel, containers, equipment in
survey/fit proper condition for stevedoring?
- Has customer disclosed full description of any
DGs or temperature controlled goods re
stevedoring handling? - Will goods be removed within 3 days after
discharge (unless otherwise agreed)?
264. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Customer warranties
- Will customer incorporate an effective Himalaya
clause in the B/Ls, noting that stevedore will
have benefit of the B/L provisions?
- Will no other party make a claim against the
stevedore other than the customer for stevedoring
services?
274. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Stevedores rights
- Entitled to deliver goods to bearer of B/L
- If stevedore believes goods are DGs or
vessel/container/goods do not meet statutory
requirements or are unsuitable for stevedoring,
it may refuse to provide services or take
appropriate measures to ensure compliance or safe
to handle
- Lien - stevedore can relocate or dispose of
containers/goods not removed from wharf
284. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Stevedores liability
- Generally relates to stevedores negligent
act/omissions - Excludes liability for inaccurate documentation
- Generally excludes consequential losses
- Subject to time bars (normally requires suit to
commence 12 months from date of container/goods
delivery or vessel arrival at facility or date of
incident)
- Force majeure
- Broad definition
- Extends to include storm/wind damage
294. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Liability issues
- Substandard vessel/container presentation
- Vessels AMSA Marine Orders
- Containers when is a unit too old?
- Reefer containers/cargoes
- Stevedores extensive reefer handling procedures
- PRAs
- vessel manifests
- receivals
- monitoring
304. Legal considerations for stevedores
- Liability issues
- DGs/Hazardous Goods
- non/mis-declaration description, handling
- inappropriate presentation, packaging or stowage
- Inadequate container presentation
- overloading
- poor packing
- insufficient cargo packaging (protection
secural)
- Truck damage
- understanding terminal procedures
- is truck suitable (ie, side lifters)?
315. Summary
- Stevedores investing now for significant future
growth - Focus on cost-effective service delivery
- Interest in OSH vessel cargo care, with
- minimised injuries, and
- minimised damage to vessels cargo
- Stevedores part of dynamic transport logistics
chain - Relies heavily on other players performance a
2 way street
- Stevedores operate in certain legal framework,
with obligations clearly identified - No new obligations, but details changing
- Reduce risk of waterfront damage
- Understand risks, improve procedures, educate
staff
- The innocent stevedore your call!
32(No Transcript)