Pan-aware Emergence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pan-aware Emergence

Description:

Fundamental level: Subjects. Intersubjective phenomenal content. Awareness NOT cognitive. ... Intersubjective phenomenal content at mid-level? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: AnandRan4
Learn more at: https://www.cise.ufl.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pan-aware Emergence


1
Pan-aware Emergence
  • Anand Rangarajan
  • anand_at_cise.ufl.edu
  • Dept. of Computer Information Science and
    Engineering
  • Univ. of Florida

2
Overview
  • Phenomenology
  • Meditative phenomenology
  • Pan-aware emergence ontology
  • Ontology of subjects
  • The combination problem
  • Representation A probabilistic model
  • Hierarchical frames
  • Constraints
  • Conclusions

3
Meditative Phenomenology
  • Mindfulness Awareness completely focused at
    center of phenomenon.
  • One pointedness, no split mind.
  • Non-referential awareness Awareness zooms out
    and is radically decentered.
  • Pure consciousness event (PCE), nirvikalpa
    samadhi.
  • Controversial.
  • Hindu and Buddhist philosophical schools
    longstanding debate over interpretation.

4
Ontology
  • Agree with Strawson (JCS, 64, 1999) When
    awareness present, a subject exists.
  • When I am aware, I am.
  • Fundamental level
  • Subjects.
  • Intersubjective phenomenal content.
  • Awareness NOT cognitive.
  • Reminiscent of pan proto-psychism.

5
Representation
Subjects and intersubjective network modeled as
directed graph
Phenomenology rides on topology. Connection
directions indicate propagation of influence.
6
The Combination Problem
  • How does phenomenology add up?
  • What about awareness of mid-level subjects
    James 1890, Seager - JCS 23?
  • Intersubjective phenomenal content at mid-level?
  • Quantum coherence etc. suggested as objective
    criteria.
  • Look at awareness very carefully.

7
Structure of awareness
One-pointedness mode
Decentered mode
Phenomenological clue to combination problem.
8
Combination principle?
  • Awareness binds configuration of lower level
    subjects
  • Binding can range from one-pointed focus to a
    decentered zoomed out focus.
  • Binding is dynamic Tacit spacetime assumptions
    Rosenberg thesis, 1997.
  • Basic idea Weighted configuration of subjects
    Higher-level subject.

9
Representation
Topology connects higher level subject with
lower level subjects possibility space
Rosenberg 1997. Momentary awareness
weighted combination of lower-level subjects.
10
Awareness Operator
  • Awareness operator in configuration space.
  • Example Low-level subjects -
  • Example Compound subject.
  • One very simple example shown above.
  • Higher-level subject Weighted combination in
    configuration space.
  • Phenomenal qualities not present in definition.

11
Pan-aware emergence
  • Lower levels have to be probabilistic in order
    for higher levels to exist.
  • Emergent properties/laws at higher levels as long
    as lower levels allow it.
  • Modeled as a probabilistic (Bayesian?) network
    Pearl 2001.
  • Higher level imposes further constraints not
    present at lower levels Wilber, SES 1995.
  • Spacetime issues?

12
Probabilistic model
Interior compound subjects and intersubjective
content. Exterior probabilistic network,
constraints.
Higher level subjects are momentary binding via
configuration space awareness operator.
13
Emergent Constraints
  • Higher-level constraints must be compatible with
    lower-level constraints.
  • Emergent laws/properties.
  • Rule Coyotes hunt and eat roadrunners.

Cheers Season 2, 14, Overall episode 84. Cliff
to Woody, He wants that particular
Roadrunner.
14
Why Pan-aware Emergence?
  • Panpsychism Biased toward cognition,
    consciousness.
  • Pan-experientialism Griffin Problem with
    language events, processes, occasions.
  • Awareness Somewhat neutral and differentiated
    from self-awareness.
  • Emergence Higher level constraints crucial.
  • Probabilistic model is basic.

15
Conclusions
  • When I am aware, I am.
  • Combination problem Clues from phenomenology.
  • Awareness operator - higher-level subjects.
  • Distinction between ontology and representation.
  • No a priori commitment to dual-aspect theory.
  • Probabilistic hierarchical model with emergent
    constraints.

16
Phenomenology
  • Migraine headaches Reliable and repeatable
    phenomena.
  • Two distinct modes of awareness
  • Awareness concentrated at center of migraine.
  • Awareness detaches and is decentered.
  • Oscillation between modes.
  • Loss of awareness.

17
Intersubjectivity
  • Hargenss JCS, 812 (2001) taxonomy
  • Intersubjectivity as spirit. Transcendental.
  • Intersubjectivity as context Mesh.
  • Intersubjectivity as resonance
  • Worldspace. Ontological Empathy, Zelig.
  • Worldview Epistemological Culture.
  • Intersubjectivity as relationship
  • It-It, I-It, I-I.

18
Representation
  • Taking van Gulicks JCS, 89-10 distinction
    between ontology and representation seriously.
  • Different from most standard ontologies.

Ontology Subjects Intersubjectivity Phenomenal
content Compound subject Momentary awareness
Representation Objects Relations Properties Part
/whole relation Processes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com