Title: Case and Contact Investigation Training
1Case and Contact Investigation Training
- Public Health Seattle and King County
2(No Transcript)
3Objectives - Learner will know
- What a case investigation is
- What a contact investigation is
- What the steps in an investigation are
- The purpose of a contact investigation interview
- How to prioritize contacts
- How to decide when to expand and investigation
- How to evaluate a contact investigation
4What is a contact investigation?
- It is a procedure for identifying people exposed
to someone with an infectious disease,
determining their risk for becoming infected,
evaluating them for disease and providing them
with appropriate treatment.
5What is a case investigation?
- It is the process for identifying and confirming,
through symptoms, laboratory test results and
epidemiological evidence, who has a communicable,
serious disease then treating this person and
educating them on how to reduce the spread of
their particular disease.
6Why are case and contact investigations done?
- To establish diagnosis
- To do lab testing
- To perform clinical evaluations
- To treat infected people
- To provide counseling to exposed people
concerning disease control recommendations - To prevent transmission to other people
- To prevent future outbreaks of disease
7When is a case and contact investigation done?
- It is done when someone with a serious and
communicable infectious disease is reported to
the health department. This report can come from
a private health care provider, a laboratory,
hospital, correctional facility or other
institution where the patient is diagnosed.
8Definitions
- Contacts - people exposed to someone with an
infectious disease, generally including household
members, roommates or housemates, close friends,
coworkers, classmates and others - Types of contacts
- household or family
- social
- school
- work
- other
9Definitions continued
- Close contact - a person who has had prolonged,
frequent or intense contact with a sick person
while they were infectious resulting in increased
risk for transmission of the infection - Other than close contacts - contacts with less
intense, less frequent or shorter durations of
contact with the infected person corresponding to
a lower risk for disease transmission
10Definitions continued
- High priority contacts - the contacts who are at
most risk for serious disease and for the spread
of disease to vulnerable populations - Index patient - a person with suspected or
confirmed disease who is the initial case
identified by the health department
11Definitions continued
- Source case - a person with an infectious disease
who is responsible for transmitting the disease
to someone else - Primary case - the person who introduces the
disease into the population
12Definitions continued
- High risk contacts - contacts at particularly
high risk of developing disease, young children,
the elderly or immune compromised individuals or
contacts that if they became infected would pose
a significant risk to other vulnerable
populations, (health care workers, teachers etc.)
13Definitions continued
- Infection rate - the percentage of persons who
become ill out of all exposed people - Period of infectiousness - the time period during
which an ill person is capable of transmitting
disease - Transmission - The spread of an infectious agent
from one person to another
14Definitions continued
- Field investigation - visiting the persons home,
workplace and other places a case spent time.
The purpose is to identify contacts and evaluate
the environmental characteristics of the place in
which exposure occurred. - Exposure - The condition of being exposed to
something that could have a harmful effect, such
as an infectious agent.
15Steps in a case investigation
- Identify missing data pieces
- Conduct interviews with primary care providers
and laboratories - Track laboratory results
- Identify if the case needs to be isolated or
quarantined - Document the information you are gathering
16Steps in a case investigation continued
- Report and coordinate efforts with the state
department of health - Seek consultation from other health department
employees, CDC, WHO etc.
17Steps in a contact investigation
- Establish the data collection tools that are
going to be used - Clarify rationale for contact investigation
- Set contact investigation priorities
- Conduct the patient interview
- Field investigation
- Risk assessment for transmission
- Decision about priority of contacts
- Evaluation of contacts
18Steps in a contact investigation continued
- Treatment and follow up for contacts
- Decision about whether or not to expand testing
- Evaluation of contact investigation activities
19Ensure prompt and accurate data intake and
assessment
- Establish forms and process as to how data is
collected - Ensure that all staff are aware of what
information to gather and what to do with this
data - Arrange for any immediate care or isolation
needed for identified patients and their contacts
20Ensure prompt and accurate data intake and
assessment continued
- Develop a system to follow up on missing or
incomplete data - Process data
- entry
- analysis
21Examples of Elements for Data Collection Forms
for Contact Investigations
- Index patient info.
- Name
- Address
- Phone (wk, home, cell)
- Date of Birth
- Employment or school
- Sex
- Race/ethnicity/language
- Disease onset, communicable period
- Symptoms
- Contact info.
- Name
- Address
- Date of birth
- Phone
- Relationship to patient
- Setting of exposure
- Days of exposure
- Hours of exposure
- Close/casual contact
- Symptoms
22Purpose of Contact Investigation Interview
- To find out more about the cases symptoms to
help determine period of infectiousness - To find out the places where the case spent time
while they were infectious
23Purpose of Contact Investigation Interview
continued
- To identify the cases contacts, get locating
information for them and find out how long the
contacts were exposed to the patient while they
were infectious - To describe the nature of the contact including
the date of exposure and the type of contact
24Symptoms
- Does the contact have symptoms
- How long have they had symptoms for
- Contacts may be able to relate these symptoms to
dates such as holidays or birthdays - With the patients approval family members or
friends can also be interviewed to determine when
symptoms began, (approval is not required but is
nice to get if possible)
25Potential barriers to performing good contact
investigations
- Nearly everyone has contact with someone but it
can be difficult to identify who these people are - Patients may be reluctant to identify their
contacts. For example they may be hesitant to
identify people with whom they use illegal drugs,
people who are here illegally or they simply may
not want friends or family to know they are sick.
26Barriers continued
- The interviewer should be sensitive to their
fears, explain the importance of evaluating the
contacts and assure the patient that
confidentiality will be maintained to the fullest
extent of the law, (i.e. if child abuse is
occurring this must be reported to authorities
etc.) - A good contact investigation form can help in
obtaining consistent, accurate information.
27Places
- Have case or contact go over their daily routine
- People spend most of their time at home, work
or school or in leisure or recreational
environments - Case should also be asked the characteristics of
each place, including the size of the place, the
amount of time spent there and what kind of
ventilation was present and how much crowding
there was in the area
28Environmental assessment
- For airborne diseases assess for
- circulation of air
- length of time in the environment
- size of the airspace
- location of the index case and each contact in
the air space - proximity and duration of contact
- did the contact have physical contact with the
cases saliva
29Environmental assessment continued
- For food borne illnesses
- food history
- food storage and handling
- types of foods
30Environmental assessment continued
- For water borne illnesses
- water sources
- amount of water consumed
- type of exposure to water
31How to prioritize contacts
- To use time and resources well the investigation
should be focused on the high priority contacts
or the people most at risk for developing and/or
transmitting severe disease.
32How to prioritize contacts continued
- Whether transmission occurs or not depends on how
infectious the case is, how susceptible the
contact is, the nature of the exposure between
the case and the contact and what kind of
environment the interaction between case and
contact occurs in.
33Contacts most likely to be infected
- People with lower immunity
- elderly
- children under the age of four
- HIV positive people
- other immunosuppressed individuals
- People who have had
- close
- regular
- prolonged contact
34Concentric circle testing
- This is a method of testing contacts in order of
risk for infection based on exposure time and
circumstances. First the closest circle to the
patient is evaluated then if they are positive
the next circle is tested and so on until
evaluation is deemed no longer necessary.
35How to decide whether or not to expand testing
- Evaluate the highest risk priority group for
infection - Look at the infection rate amongst these
individuals - If significant infection has occurred amongst the
first group of close contacts then the
investigation should be expanded
36Contact Investigation Evaluation
- Were the appropriate of contacts identified?
- Were the highest priority contacts identified and
tested? - Was the investigation performed in all applicable
settings? - Was the investigation expanded appropriately?
37Contact Investigation Evaluation continued
- Were contacts completely evaluated and where
appropriate, given treatment? - Did identified contacts complete, where
appropriate, treatment regime? - Did identified cases, where appropriate,
treatment regime?
38Contact Investigation Evaluation continued
- Program evaluation is a critical component of
every program. Evaluation of performance is
important to ensure that resources and priorities
are being used effectively on the highest
priority activities.
39Review
40Sources of information for this presentation
- Dr. Jeff Duchin, Chief of Communicable Disease
and Epidemiology, Public Health Seattle and King
County - Janice Boase, Assistant Chief of Communicable
Disease and Epidemiology, Public Health Seattle
and King County - CDC Self Study Modules on Tuberculosis, Case and
Contact Investigations