Title: Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle
1Effects of Climate Change on the Hydrologic Cycle
Presented by Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K.2
Surface Water Hydrology Instructor Dr.
Maidment April 29, 2008
https//webspace.utexas.edu/jbklenz/ce394k/klenzen
dorf.ppt
2Outline
- Introduction
- Colorado River Basin and Lake Mead
Characteristics - Climate Change Characteristics
- Summary and Conclusions
2
3Introduction
- Project motivation
- Barnett and Pierce (2008), When Will Lake Mead
Go Dry? article attributes global warming to low
lake levels. Is this true?!? - Q What do I know about climate change?
- A Not much!
- Problems to investigate
- Current conditions of Colorado River Basin and
review of literature and causes of low lake
levels - Results of climate change on hydrologic cycle and
movement of atmospheric water
3
4Colorado River Basin (CRB)
- Total drainage area of 243,000 mi2
- Average annual streamflow
- 15.1 MAF (1906-present gage values)
- 13.5 MAF (tree ring reconstruction values)
- 18.0 MAF (1920 allocation value)
- Allocations governed by Law of the River
- Allocations total 18 MAF, of which over 16 MAF is
currently being utilized
4
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
5CRB Statistics
- 90 of streamflow generated in Upper Basin
- 70 of streamflow generated from snow pack
- Average annual precipitation (P) 14.0 in.
- Average annual evaporation (E) 12.2 in.
- Average annual runoff (P-E) 1.8 in. (13)
- Allocations of 18.0 MAF
- 7.5 MAF to Upper Basin
- 7.5 MAF (1 MAF if necessary) to Lower Basin
- 1.5 MAF to Mexico
- Additional minor water rights
- Negative net inflow (Outflow gt Inflow)
- I(t) 15.1 MAF (or as low as 13.5 MAF)
- Q(t) 16.0 MAF (increasing trend)
- Long term failure with negative net inflow
5
6Literature on CRB Water Supply
- Global Change Research Act of 1990 called for
determining the effects of climate change on
national resources - Multiple studies have found that human induced
increases in temperature of 2-4oC result in a
runoff reduction of 10-30 over the next 30-50
years - More precipitation will fall as rain instead of
snow less snow pack earlier snow melt
change in timing of peak flows - Tarboton (1995) and others examined severe
sustained drought in CRB and found no major
adverse impacts to various drought conditions - Use of general circulation models (GCMs) have
shown increases in temperature and evaporation,
decreases in precipitation and runoff suggest
failure of system
6
7Barnett and Pierce, 2008
- Provide first estimate of when Lakes Mead and
Powell will go dry - 10 chance empty by 2013 50 chance empty by
2021 - Causes global warming,
- natural climate variability,
- current operating status
- Used water balance model
- and Monte Carlo simulations
- to create CDF curves for
- multiple scenarios
7
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
8Barnett and Pierce, 2008
- Absence of climate change
- Net inflow of -0.15 MAF in 2008
- Net inflow of -1.15 MAF by 2060
- CDF of system running dry based on net inflow
- Timing of wet/dry years still allows for failure
with zero net inflow
8
No climate change
No climate change
Climate change included
9Climate Change Water Vapor
- Greenhouse gases (CO2, water vapor, etc) trap
infrared radiation emitted from the Earths
surface - Increased surface infrared radiation must be
balanced by an increase in sensible heat
(temperature) and latent heat (evaporation) - Clausius-Clapeyron (CC) Equation
- es is saturated vapor pressure
- T is temperature
- Lv is latent heat of vaporization
- Rv is water vapor gas constant
- Assumptions
- Change in volume of evaporation equals volume of
water vapor produced - Constant Lv
- Water vapor is an ideal gas
- External pressure doesnt affect vapor pressure
10Climate Change Water Vapor
- CC Equation approximated as
- es in Pa
- T in oC
Atmosphere can hold more water
10
Source Chow et al., 1988
11Climate Change Runoff
- Evaporation increases across the Earth
- Precipitation decreases for CRB
- Runoff (P-E) decreases for CRB
- Current locations with low runoff will get lower
high runoff will get higher - Areas of high runoff will shrink with climate
change - More extreme droughts and floods
Evaporation
CRB
Runoff
CRB
Model predictions of change in runoff for double
CO2 concentrations.
Precipitation
Source Held and Soden, 2006
12Climate Change Runoff
Average percent change in runoff volume compared
to historical conditions (1900-1970) from 12
climate models.
Source Milly et al., 2008
13Summary
- Colorado River Basin Summary
- CRB reservoir system will likely fail due to
allocations greater than streamflow - Main problem is recent change to negative net
inflow due to increased water usage - Climate change will only make the situation worse
- Climate Change Summary
- Increased temperature allows atmosphere to hold
more water vapor - Increased evaporation in CRB
- Decreased runoff in CRB
13
14Conclusion
- Climate change will hurt the reliability of
reservoir system in the CRB. However, the major
problem is over allocation of the river, and this
problem is what should be addressed. - Take home message Cant blame global warming for
everything!
15Works Cited
- Barnett, T.P. and D.W. Pierce (2008) When Will
Lake Mead go Dry?, Journal of Water Resources
Research, Vol. 44, W03201. - Boer, G.J. (1993) Climate Change and the
Regulation of the Surface Moisture and Energy
Budgets, Climate Dynamics, Vol. 8, pg. 225-239. - Bosilovich, M.G., S.D. Schubert, and G.K. Walker
(2005) Global Changes of the Water Cycle
Intensity, Journal of Climate, Vol. 18, pg.
1591-1608. - Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and L.W. Mays (1988)
Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Boston,
Massachusetts. - Held, I.M. and B.J. Soden (2000) Water Vapor
Feedback and Global Warming, Annual Review of
Energy and the Environment, Vol. 25, pg. 441-475. - Held, I.M. and B.J. Soden (2006) Robust
Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global
Warming, Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, pg.
5686-5699. - Milly, P.C.D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R.M.
Hirsch, Z.W. Kundzewicz, D.P. Lettenmaier, and
R.J. Stouffer (2008) Stationarity is Dead
Whither Water Management?, Science, Vol. 319,
pg. 573-574. - NASA (2003) EO Study Drought Lowers Lake Mead,
Jesse Allen, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Earth Observatory, 21 February
2008, lthttp//earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Lake
Mead/lake_mead.htmlgt - Pierrehumbert, R.T. (2002) The Hydrologic Cycle
in Deep-Time Climate Problems, Nature, Vol. 419,
pg. 191-198. - Tarboton, D.G. (1995) Hydrologic Scenarios for
Severe Sustained Drought in the Southwestern
United States, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol.
31, No. 5, pg. 803-813. - USBR (2008) Bureau of Reclamation Lower
Colorado Region, 5 March 2008, United States
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Reclamation, lthttp//www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/
hourly/mead-elv.htmlgt - Woodhouse, C.A., S.T. Gray, and D.M. Meko (2006)
Updated Streamflow Reconstructions for the Upper
Colorado River Basin, Water Resources Research,
Vol. 42, W05415. - See http//webspace.utexas.edu/jbklenz/ce394k/Klen
zendorfFinalReport.htm for complete list of works
cited.
15
16Questions?
16
17- This slide intentionally left blank.
18May, 2000
18
Source NASA Earth Observatory
19May, 2003
19
Source NASA Earth Observatory
2020
Source NASA Earth Observatory
21Average 18.0 MAF
Average 15.1 MAF
Average 13.5 MAF
21
Source Woodhouse et al., 2006
22CRB Reservoir System
- Lake Mead
- Constructed in 1936 by Hoover Dam
- Provides water to 8 million people in California,
Nevada, Arizona, Mexico - Total storage of nearly 30 MAF, over half for
water supply - Lakes Mead and Powell
- Combined storage of 52 MAF
- Account for 85 of total storage in CRB
22
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
23Drought 1125 ft
Lake Powell Constructed
Addition of new water intake at elevation 860 ft
by 2013 (ENR, 2008)
23
Source USBR, 2008
24CRB Allocations
- Upper Basin at 5 MAF/yr and increasing
- Lower Basin already at full allocation of 7.5
MAF/yr - Mexico already at full allocation of 1.5 MAF/yr
- Additional loss to evaporation of about 1.5 MAF/yr
Source Barnett and Pierce, 2008
25 26Climate Change
- 1827 Fourier said atmosphere will allow solar
radiation to enter uninhibited but traps thermal
radiation from the Earths surface - 1861 Tyndal said thermal radiation trapping is
not due to major gases (N2 and O2) but to trace
gases - Major greenhouse gases
- CO2
- Water vapor, H2O
- Others (CH4, N2O)
- Mechanisms of climate change will not be
discussed here, only impact on hydrology
26
27Climate Change CO2
- CO2 concentration from 1900-1920 is 300 ppm
- CO2 concentration at present day is 355 ppm
(Bosilovich et al, 2005) - CO2 concentration to melt all permanent polar ice
is 1200 ppm (Pierrehumbert, 2002) - Most climate models
- investigate doubling of CO2
- to roughly 700 ppm and find
- an increase in temperature
- of 2-4 oC
Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008
28Climate Change Water Vapor
- The atmosphere can hold more water vapor at
higher temperatures - This produces more clouds which warm the surface
in infrared (longwave, thermal) radiation but
cool the surface in shortwave (solar) radiation
(Boer, 1993) - Therefore, increased water vapor in the
atmosphere will further act to increase surface
temperature and evaporation - This will further increase atmospheric water
vapor concentrations - Result possible runaway greenhouse effect
29Climate Change CC Relation
- Model results dont scale as the CC equation
predicts - Less change in precipitation and evaporation with
increased temperature
a6.5
29
Source Boer, 1993
30Runaway Greenhouse
Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) is
representative of infrared radiation and can be
modeled as a function of temperature
- OLR of 260 W/m2
- Point a, T276 K, low RH, low CO2
- Point b, T288 K, high RH, low CO2
- Point c, T330 K, high RH, high CO2
- OLR of 300 W/m2
- Point a, T increases by 14 K
- Point b, T increases by 30 K
- Water vapor feedback
- Kombayashi-Ingersoll limit
- How fast can a moist atmosphere loose energy by
infrared radiation
Source Pierrehumbert, 2002
31Climate Change Runoff
Annual average of change in runoff compared to
the global modeling average.
Source Held and Soden, 2006
32Climate Change Runoff
- Current precipitation trends controlled by wind
circulation - These trends intensify due to climate change, so
dry areas become drier and wet areas become wetter
Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008
33General Circulations Models (GCMs)
- Focus only on troposphere
- Horizontal resolution of 2o to 4o latitude and
longitude - Vertical resolution of 10 to 20 layers
- Assume constant relative humidity
- Assume constant lapse rate
- Unable to resolve small scale phenomenon
Source Maidment CE 394K.2 class notes, 2008