Substantial Evidence of Drug Effectiveness - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Substantial Evidence of Drug Effectiveness

Description:

... i.e. a minimum of two studies, one of which had to be a field study. ... Utility of data may be time dependent. 21. Substantial Evidence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: cvm7
Learn more at: http://www.fda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Substantial Evidence of Drug Effectiveness


1
Substantial Evidence of Drug Effectiveness
  • Cindy L. Burnsteel, DVM
  • Division of Therapeutic Drugs for Food Animals
  • Center for Veterinary Medicine

March 7, 2002
2
In order for a New Animal Drug to be approved
  • FDA must find, among other things, that
  • the product is safe and effective for its
  • intended use.
  • the methods, facilities and controls used for the
    manufacturing, processing and packaging of the
    drug are adequate to preserve its identity,
    strength, quality and purity.

3
Substantial Evidence
  • Statutory Standard for demonstrating
    Effectiveness
  • Adequate and Well Controlled Studies
  • Inferential Value
  • Independent Substantiation

4
Demonstrating Effectiveness
  • Drug effectiveness is evaluated on the basis of
    the information submitted in the application and
    must provide substantial evidence that the the
    drug will have the effect it purports or is
    represented to have under the conditions of use
    prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the
    proposed labeling.

5
Animal Drug Availability Act of 1996 (ADAA)
  • Amended the Federal Food, Drug Cosmetic Act
    (FFDCA)

6
Animal Drug Availability Act of 1996 (ADAA)
  • Its purpose was to facilitate the approval of new
    animal drugs and medicated feeds by, among other
    things,
  • further defining adequate and well-controlled
    (AWC) studies and substantial evidence (SE) of
    effectiveness
  • modifying the approval process for certain
    combination new animal drug applications

7
Definition of Substantial Evidence
  • evidence consisting of one or more adequate
    and well-controlled studies (AWC), such as a
    study in a target species, study in laboratory
    animals, field study, bioequivalence study, or an
    in vitro study,

8
Definition continued...
  • conducted by experts qualified by
    scientific training and experience to evaluate
    the effectiveness of the drug involved, on the
    basis of which it could fairly and reasonably be
    concluded by such experts

9
Definition continued...
  • that the new animal drug will have the
    effect it purports or is represented to have
    under the conditions of use prescribed,
    recommended or suggested in the labeling or
    proposed labeling thereof

10
Substantial Evidence
  • Statutory Standard for demonstrating
    Effectiveness
  • Adequate and Well Controlled Studies
  • Inferential Value
  • Independent Substantiation

11
Substantial Evidence...
  • Shall consist of a sufficient number of current
    AWC studies of sufficient quality and
    persuasiveness to permit qualified experts to
  • Determine that the selected parameters and their
    measured responses reliably reflect
    effectiveness.
  • Determine that the results are repeatable and
    valid inferences can be drawn to the target
    population.
  • Conclude that the drug is effective for
    proposed claim at dose/dose range and associated
    conditions of use.

12
Type of AWC Studies
  • May include, but are not limited to
  • published studies
  • foreign studies
  • validated, model studies
  • studies conducted by or on behalf of the sponsor

13
Flexibility Created by ADAA
  • Before it was amended by ADAA, the FFDCA required
    investigations, i.e. a minimum of two studies,
    one of which had to be a field study.
  • Now, there is more flexibility
  • one AWC study may suffice
  • a field study may not be required

14
What Studies Are Needed to Demonstrate
Effectiveness?
  • Case-by-case judgement dependent upon
  • New entity
  • Number of proposed claims
  • Narrow or broad definition for each proposed
    claim
  • Conditions of use for each proposed claim

15
Substantial Evidence
  • Statutory Standard for demonstrating
    Effectiveness
  • Adequate and Well Controlled Studies
  • Inferential Value
  • Independent Substantiation

16
Inferential Value
  • Confidence with which Effectiveness data
  • For a proposed claim
  • Under the conditions tested
  • Can be used to conclude the drug will be
    effective in the target population for the claim
    and associated conditions of use suggested in the
    proposed labeling

17
Inferential Value
  • Historically, CVM used geographic location as a
    way of referring to factors that affect the
    effectiveness of the new animal drug in the
    inferential space.
  • These factors may interact with the drug effect
    to render the drug more or less effective at some
    locations than at others.
  • These factors may have an impact on growth,
    production, or response to therapy.

18
Inferential Value
  • Factors to be considered
  • Animal Management (husbandry, standards of
    veterinary care, vaccination programs,
    biosecurity, disease control, expertise of animal
    caretakers)
  • Animal Characteristics (genetics, breeds, gender,
    age, weight, class of animal and health status)
  • Nutritional regimes

19
Inferential Value
  • Factors to be considered (contd)
  • Disease Characteristics (seasonality, genetic
    variation, species, strains, virulence, and drug
    resistance of the pathogen or parasite)
  • Environmental conditions (climatic conditions,
    housing, stocking densities, sanitation level)

20
Inferential Value
  • Locations chosen should
  • permit generalization of study findings to the
    target population
  • be in major areas of production or endemic
    disease areas.
  • Utility of data may be time dependent

21
Substantial Evidence
  • Statutory Standard for demonstrating
    Effectiveness
  • Adequate and Well Controlled Studies
  • Inferential Value
  • Independent Substantiation

22
Independent Substantiation
  • Goal is to reduce the likelihood that an
    experimental finding is the result of
  • unanticipated, undetected, or systematic bias
  • chance
  • fraudulent conduct/reporting of studies
  • In other words, the likelihood that the results
    obtained are likely to be repeatable.

23
Independent Substantiation
  • Generally, independent substantiation is achieved
    by conducting multiple adequate and
    well-controlled studies that corroborate the
    results of one another.
  • A single AWC study may be sufficient to provide
    independent substantiation if it has certain
    characteristics.

24
Study characteristics
  • Although no one of the following characteristics
    is necessarily determinative, the presence of one
    or more in a study makes it more likely that a
    single study could provide independent
    substantiation.

25
Study characteristics
  • a multi-location study in which no single study
    site provides an unusually large fraction of the
    target animals and no single investigator or site
    is disproportionately responsible for the effects
    seen
  • a study with sufficiently large and broad
    entrance criteria such that significant effects
    are found across key subsets

26
Study characteristics
  • a study with multiple, prospectively identified
    endpoints, each of which represents a different
    effect and where more than one endpoint shows
    statistical evidence of an effect
  • a study which provides highly reliable and
    statistically strong evidence of effectiveness.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Top Market Hog Production States ( of total
hogs)
9.6
26.4
4.8
5.3
7.2
5.0
16.2
4.1
78.6
USDA, Dec. 2001 52,564,000 market hogs
http//usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/live
stock/php-bb/2001
29
Factors Affecting Swine Production
  • Animal genetics
  • Management practices
  • Environmental conditions
  • Dietary differences

30
Animal Genetics
  • High lean vs traditional or lower lean
  • High lean
  • Predominant lines- PIC, Dekalb, Newsham
  • Low lean
  • Older lines of genetics
  • Traditional crossbred programs
  • Stress susceptibility (stress gene)
  • Differences between lines

31
Management Practices
  • Age at weaning/slaughter
  • Breeding programs (AI vs. natural)
  • Vaccination program
  • Disease control program
  • Intensity of individual animal care
  • Employee expertise/Labor force
  • All In - All Out vs. Gradual progression

32
Environmental Conditions
  • Climatic factors (temperature and humidity)
  • House flooring (full slats, half-slats, solid
    concrete, dirt)
  • House type (environmentally controlled,
    curtain-sided, open-front, etc.)
  • Stocking densities
  • Cleanliness and waste removal (pit system, dry
    manure, etc.)

33
Dietary Differences
  • Dietary ingredients
  • Energy sources (corn, wheat, milo, etc.)
  • Protein sources (SBM, FM, CSM, etc.)
  • Use of crystalline amino acids
  • Dietary preparation
  • Fineness of feed grind, pelleting, etc.
  • Number of dietary changes
  • Sex-separate feeding

34
Substantial Evidence
  • Consists of one or more current AWC studies,
    conducted by qualified experts, that are of
    sufficient quality and persuasiveness to allow
    qualified experts to conclude the drug is
    effective for each intended use and associated
    conditions of use suggested in the labeling

35
Acknowledgements
  • Center Veterinary Medicine Staff
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com