Evidence-Based Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Evidence-Based Practice

Description:

Tended to recommend pharmacotherapy over non-pharm treatments ... Reno, NV: Context Press. Green, G. (1996). Evaluating claims about treatments for autism. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: facultyC5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evidence-Based Practice


1
Evidence-Based Practice
2
Summary of Presentation
  • Evaluating Interventions
  • Recommendations for Parents
  • Fads

3
What Interventions Should We Use?
  • The Right to Effective Behavioral Treatment
  • ABA Task Force (1987)
  • Published in JABA (1988)
  • http//www.abainternational.org/ABA/statements/tre
    atment.asp
  • Individuals who are recipients of treatment
    designed to change their behavior have the right
    to
  • A therapeutic environment
  • Services whose overriding goal is personal
    welfare
  • Treatment by a competent behavior analyst
  • Programs that teach functional skills
  • Behavioral assessment and ongoing evaluation
  • The most effective treatment procedures available

4
The Most Effective Treatment Procedures Available
  • An individual is entitled to effective and
    scientifically validated treatment
  • In turn, the behavior analyst has an obligation
    to use only those procedures demonstrated by
    research to be effective.

5
Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB)
Guidelines for Responsible Conduct
  • Section 2.09 Treatment Efficacy
  • http//www.bacb.com/consum_frame.html
  • The behavior analyst always has the
    responsibility to recommend scientifically
    supported most effective treatment procedures.
    Effective treatment procedures have been
    validated as having both long-term and short-term
    benefits to clients and society.
  • Clients have a right to effective treatment
    (i.e., based on the research literature and
    adapted to the individual client).
  • Behavior analysts are responsible for review and
    appraisal of likely effects of all alternative
    treatments, including those provided by other
    disciplines and no intervention.

6
As Behavior Analysts, we
  • Maintain a healthy skepticism
  • Differentiate opinions, beliefs, and speculations
    from facts
  • Dont make claims without supporting objective
    data
  • Skepticism ? cynicism
  • Being open and being skeptical might seem
    contradictory, but theyre not. This is the way
    to think scientifically.
  • Some phenomena that seem outlandish are valid
  • Lucid dreaming, extraordinary feats of human
    memory and appropriate clinical uses of hypnosis
    (as opposed to the scientifically unsupported use
    of hypnosis for memory recovery).
  • We must keep our minds open but not so open that
    our brains fall out

7
Ghezzi, Williams, and Carr (1999)
  • Preface
  • Those who fall in love with practice without
    science are like a sailor who enters a ship
    without a helm or compass, and who never can be
    certain whither he is going (Leonardo da Vinci)

8
Green (1996)
  • Behavior analysts use a number of practices to
    increase the objectivity of evidence about
    treatment effects
  • Operational definitions (specific and observable
    descriptions of behavior)
  • Measurement procedures are clearly specified
  • Interobserver agreement data are collected
  • Multiple measures of the effects of tx can be
    obtained for example,
  • Direct observation
  • Standardized tests
  • Parent ratings of behavior

9
How Do Parents Choose a Treatment for Their Child
with Autism?
  • Recommendation by pediatrician or other doctor
  • School
  • Other parent
  • Internet, book
  • Do you think these sources reliably recommend
    interventions based on the objectivity of the
    evidence?

10
Fads in Autism Treatment
  • Metz, Mulick, and Butter (2005) Google search -
    autism and treatment 65 distinct interventions
    sold as effective for treating autism
  • Telepathy, injection of sheep stem cells, thyme,
    swimming with dolphins
  • Fads in the media
  • In autism treatment, fads tend to be harmful
  • Waste time
  • Waste money
  • Falsely raise hopes and expectations
  • Distract from effective treatments
  • In some cases, harm children and families

11
Why Do Ineffective/Unproven Treatments Become
Fads? (Vyse, 2005)
  • Theyre presented as relatively easy and with
    immediate effects by people who appear warm,
    sincere, and attentive
  • Best treatment is deemed distasteful or is hard
    to get
  • Alternate treatments are supported by popular
    culture, feel right, seem to make sense
  • Professionals or other people recommend them
  • Most professionals are not trained how to
    evaluate treatments
  • Autism treatment is a commercial enterprise

12
Why Do Ineffective/Unproven Treatments Become
Fads? (Metz et al., 2005)
  • Parents are in a vulnerable position
  • Doing SOMETHING feels better than doing nothing
  • Grieving process
  • Avoidance of guilt
  • Urgency
  • Qualities that make parents dedicated and
    enthusiastic make them vulnerable to accept
    claims without close scrutiny
  • Nature of Autism
  • Cause is unknown
  • Autism is mysterious myth of the hidden inner
    child

13
Even Well-Meaning Professionals Use
Ineffective/Unproven Interventions
(Metz et al., 2005)
  • Example of facilitated communication
  • Rationale provided for the therapy may be logical
    or sound convincing
  • But many are based on flawed theories about the
    cause of autism
  • For the overwhelming majority of autism
    treatments, anecdotes and testimonials are the
    only supporting evidence
  • Almost none stand up to reasonably rigorous
    scientific evaluation
  • Many therapies for autism in widespread use today
    have been shown to be ineffective in scientific
    studies
  • Some have been shown to be harmful
  • Still others have not been subjected to any
    rigorous evaluations

14
Where can we refer parents?
  • Association for Science in Autism Treatment
  • www.Asatonline.org

15
Evidence-Based Practice
  • Evidenced-based interventions
  • Evidence-based practices
  • Empirically supported treatments
  • Best practices

16
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)ODonohue and
Ferguson (2006)
  • the integration of the best available research
    with clinical expertise in the context of patient
    characteristics, culture, and preferences (APA
    Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based
    Practice, 2006, p. 273)
  • http//www.apa.org/practice/ebp.html
  • Other similar terms
  • Empirically-validated therapies (EVT)
  • Empirically-supported therapies (EST)

17
Development of EBPODonohue and Ferguson (2006)
  • 20 years ago - Clinical practice guidelines
    developed in medicine to
  • Help standardize decision-making in treatment
  • Encourage use of empirically sound treatments
  • Improve quality of medical services and reduce
    errors
  • Early 90s American Psychiatric Association
    developed their own clinical practice guidelines
  • Intended to assist psychiatrists in
    decision-making in treatment
  • Tended to recommend pharmacotherapy over
    non-pharm treatments
  • Mid 90s American Psychological Association
    (APA) Task Force publishes their own clinical
    practice guidelines

18
The Chambless Criteria
  • Division 12 of the American Psychological
    Association (APA) Clinical Psychology
  • Established a Task Force (headed by Diane
    Chambless) to identify and promote empirically
    supported psychological treatments in 1993.
  • Chambless et al. (1998) available at
    http//www.apa.org/divisions/div12/est/97report.pd
    f

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Weaknesses of Chambless Criteria ODonohue and
Ferguson (2006)
  • Do not take clinical significance into account
  • Focus on efficacy, not effectiveness
  • Will the same results be obtained in natural
    settings? Is the treatment practical to
    implement in terms of staffing, funds, expertise?
  • Most studies on the EBP list do not include
    participants with comorbid disorders
  • Are biased toward group designs and inferential
    statistics
  • Only 2 good group design exps, but at least 9
    single-case exps
  • Many single-case designs dont compare 2
    treatments

22
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Improvement Act (IDEA) No Child Left Behind
(NCLB)
  • NCLB of 2001 interventions should be based on
    scientific research
  • IDEA of 2004 scientifically based institutional
    practices for those in spec eds
  • Services in a childs IEP should be based on
    peer reviewed research the extent practicable
    (IDEA, 2004)

23
Professional Organizations
  • APA
  • Established scientific and professional
    knowledge of the discipline
  • National Association of School Psychology (NASP)
  • Practice should be based on scitific research

24
Horner, Carr, Halle, McGee, Odom, and Wolery
(2003)
  • Single-subject research documents a practice as
    evidence-based when
  • The practice is operationally defined
  • The outcomes and context in which the practice is
    to be used are defined (target behaviors
    affected, setting, age, skills, diagnosis,
    implementer)
  • The practice is implemented with fidelity (tx
    integrity data)
  • The change is the DV is shown to result from the
    IV experimental control!
  • Effects of the practice are
    replicated across a sufficient
    number of
    studies

25
Make a table
APA NY State Dept of Heath (1999) CEC NASP CASP rating system for single case designs Gina Greens Gold standards National Standards Projects
Well-established Tx Efficacy demonstrated (gt placebo or to established Tx) in at least 2 good b/w group designs expos OR large series of s-c designs exps with good design and comparison to another Tx
Probably Efficacios Tx
Experimental Tx

26
Script and Script Fading Script and Script Fading Script and Script Fading Script and Script Fading Script and Script Fading Script and Script Fading
APA NY State CEC NASP NASP rating system Gina Greens Gold Standards NSP






27
Problems with Current Clinical Guidelines
  • Studies examined were before 1999
  • Process used by each of the task forces were not
    made public
  • Not comprehensive

28
National Standards Project-examined empirical
evidence supporting interventions that could be
used in school setting for those younger than 22
  • Exclusion criteria
  • Medical/complementary/alternative
  • Axis II outside of MR
  • Studies that could not be easily performed in
    schools
  • Qualitative analyses or published in non-peer
    reviewed journals

29
Scientific Merit Rating Scale
  • Rated from 0-5
  • Research design
  • Measurement of the DV
  • Measurement of the IV
  • Participant selection
  • Generalization

30
Coding
  • Beneficial treatment effects reported
  • Single-case designs
  • Strong, moderate weak
  • Functional relationship has been established is
    replicated
  • Pont of comparison across conditions exists
  • Magnitude of change is consistent
  • Percentage eon non-overlapping points is
    impressive
  • No treatment effect reported
  • Adverse treatment effects reported

31
National Standards Project
  • http//www.nationalautismcenter.org/about/national
    .php

32
References
  • APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based
    Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in
    psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271-285.
  • Chambless, D.L., Baker, M., Baucom, D.H.,
    Beutler, L.E., Calhoun, K.S., Crits-Christoph,P.,
    et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated
    therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51,
    3-16.
  • Ghezzi, P.M., Williams, W.L., Carr J.E.
    (1999). Autism Behavior analytic perspectives.
    Reno, NV Context Press.
  • Green, G. (1996). Evaluating claims about
    treatments for autism. In C. Maurice, G. Green,
    S.C. Luce (Eds.), Behavioral intervention for
    young children with autism. (pp. 15-28). Austin,
    TX Pro-ed.
  • Metz, B., Mulick, J.A., Butter, E.M. (2005).
    Autism A lat-20th-century fad magnet. In J.W.
    Jacobson, R.M. Foxx, J.A. Mulick (Eds.),
    Controversial therapies for developmental
    disabilities. (pp. 237-263). Mahwah, NJ
    Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • ODonohue, W., Ferguson, K.E. (2006).
    Evidence-based practice in psychology and
    behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today,
    7, 335-350.
  • Vyse, S. (2005). Where do fads come from? In
    J.W. Jacobson, R.M. Foxx, J.A. Mulick (Eds.),
    Controversial thearpies for developmental
    disabilities. (pp. 3-17). Mahwah, NJ Lawrence
    Erlbaum.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com