Title: Total Quality Management
1State University - Higher School of Economics
Institute for Policy and Program Evaluation
Total Quality Management Application to Business
Public Sector (Ekaterina Kuznetsova) Colloquiu
m Program and Policy Evaluation Methodology
and Application Moscow, 23. November 2006
www.hse.ru
www.iopp.ru
2Contents
- Case-studies
- TQM in Business
- TQM in Public Sector
3TQM in BUSINESS
4The EFQM Excellence Award
- is given when the Jury identifies an exceptional
organisation with excellent and sustainable
results across all areas, and demonstrates a
highly effective, efficient and continuously
improved management system
5Insight People Development and Involvement at
CCINCA
-
- CCINCA, a 2005 EFQM Excellence Award Finalist,
sets an example with a structured people
management system with the objective of improving
customers and results orientation. - CCINCA has managed to achieve a culture of
improvement and trust.
6- Goal to change and to modernize the management
system to cope with new competitive challenges - Objective to be a public company managed as a
private one with strong customer and results
orientation - Implementation people development and
involvement improvement of people management
system
7KEY SUCCESS FACTOR
- Implementation of a structured people management
system
8The main elements of the system (1)
- HR policy which gives the orientations
- A competence development and training process
- An internal communication process
- An empowerment process
- An evaluation and recognition process
9The main elements of the system (2)
- A set of assessment tools
- annual EFQM self-assessment
- annual employee satisfaction survey
- manager satisfaction survey
- key performance indicators for each HR process
- an annual service contract review with directors
- some online surveys for training and
communication
10Results achieved
- Deployment of the annual individual appraisal
interview throughout the group, one part
concerning skills and another part concerning
performance. - Recognition, through financial and non financial
rewards, linked to individual achievement of
objectives. - 100 employees involvement in the improvement
programme. - Creation of a culture of improvement that is
reinforced by the deployment of improvement
process and assessment tools in each of the
activities. - Increased of the training budget to around 6 of
the payroll and structure of the training
processes to improve employee satisfaction with
training.
11Do
- Get your top management committed to people
development and convinced that the implementation
of a people management system is a key factor in
the global performance - Work closely with managers and employees on the
design of new HR tools to understand their needs
and to provide everyone with a clear
understanding of the project goals and
objectives - Take the time to deploy the tools progressively
- Empower your managers through the use of new HR
tools - Regularly review the effectiveness of the system
in assessing the satisfaction of employees and
managers - Take the time to communicate on the project at
all levels - Ensure training and coaching for managers and
their teams.
12Dont
- Dont deploy a new tool for all employees at the
same time take the time to test - Dont start the implementation of a new tool
using criteria which have not been worked out by
the employees and the managers themselves - Dont forget to review
- Dont hesitate to coach people if difficulties
are encountered
13(No Transcript)
14TQM in Public Sector
15DOES IT WORK?
16Current political context of government
- focus on short-term activities that do not
fundamentally change systems (emphasis on the
quick fix) - crisis driven rather than preventative
- driven by current economic conditions rather than
long-term conditions - characterized by mistrust between political and
civil service arms of government - top-down decision making prevalent
- highly adversarial positions of political parties
17The Pennsylvania Department of Transportations
Quality Program
18Revitalization
- complete overhaul of poorly performing public
organizations into high-performance organizations - Because of declines in service delivery,
inadequate funding, cutbacks, low morale, lack of
management capacity, lack of a sense of mission,
loss of political support and public credibility
19Two Decades of Quality Management at PENNDOT,
1982-2002
20Two Years of Innovation and Change at PENNDOT,
1999-2001
21(No Transcript)
22Thank You