Title: Announcements
1Announcements Dec. 1, 2006
- Final exam, Monday, Dec. 11, 8am.
- (taking the final cannot hurt your grade)
2New York Times Interior Official and Federal
Biologists Clash on Danger to Bird December 5,
2004 The scientific opinions of a Bush
administration appointee at the Interior
Department with no background in wildlife biology
were provided as part of the source material for
the panel of Fish and Wildlife Service biologists
and managers who recommended against giving the
greater sage grouse protection under the
endangered species act. The appointee, Julie
MacDonald, a senior policymaker, criticized
studies showing widespread loss of grouse
territory and sporadic declines in grouse
populations. The sage grouse, whose habitat
overlaps areas of likely oil and gas deposits
across states like Wyoming and Montana, would
likely become an economic headache to the energy
and cattle industries if it were listed. Ms.
MacDonald's critique of sage grouse biology and
the biologists who work for an agency she
oversees showed flashes of her strong
property-rights background and her deference to
industry views.
3Los Angeles Times Battle lines drawn on
protection of species Julie Cart and Kenneth R.
Weiss, December 05, 2004 SAN DIEGO Western
governors gathered last week to plan with the
Bush administration and Congress how to change
the Endangered Species Act, the 31-year-old law
they say has cost developers, loggers and
ranchers too much money and hassle for the few
animals brought back from the brink of
extinction. "Just about everybody agrees the
Endangered Species Act is broken," said Rep.
Richard Pombo, R-Calif., a cattleman turned
chairman of the House Resources Committee. "The
only way you are going fix it is with legislative
change."
4(No Transcript)
5Environmental Policy
- Lecture Objectives
- What is the history of environmental policy in
the U.S.? - What role did Kepone play in environmental
policy? - What does the Endangered Species Act do?
6Development of Policy
- Policy - general principles by which the branches
of government guide management of public affairs - Congress passes legislation in form of acts and
statutes to guide or regulate behavior
7Development of Policy
- Types of regulatory approaches
- Prevention ban production/activity, limit
output, technology requirement - Discourage taxes on undesirable products,
liability for products/services, public
disclosure - Encourage subsidies for alternatives, tradeable
permits
http//thomas.loc.gov/
8(No Transcript)
9History of Environmental Policy
- Prior to 1960s, no set Environmental Policy in
U.S. - Federal agencies, industries, businesses, and
individuals did not have to consider the
environmental impacts of their actions
10Rachel Carson
- Published Silent Spring in 1962
- Warned about the environmental consequences of
DDT use - Considered to spark the beginning of the modern
environmental movement - Public Awareness
- Governmental research on pollution
11Problems of the 1960s
- Air Pollution
- Water Pollution
- Chemicals
Agent Orange
12National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 1969
- Requires
- federal agencies to consider environmental
consequences of actions - produces publicly reviewable document on this
analysis Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
- Created Council on Environmental Quality
- advises president, can issue regulations for
federal agency compliance with NEPA
13NEPA
- NEPAs strength EIS requirement
- Revolutionary stop and think strategy
- prevents tunnel vision by agencies
- Emulated by 25 states and 80 countries
14April 22th, 1970 First Earth Day
Organized by Gaylord Nelson
20 million people marched to demand improved
environmental quality
15Problems of the 1970s
- Water Pollution
- Air Pollution
- Oil embargo energy crisis (73-74)
- Environmental concerns faded when energy crisis
threatened the economy - Love Canal (1978)
- Three Mile Island (1979)
16Environmental Legislation in the 1970s
Clean Water Act
Clean Air Act
Safe Drinking Water Act
Endangered Species Act
Establishment of the Environmental Protection
Agency
17Improvement in Air Quality
4/5 primary air pollutants decreased since
1970 Nitrogen oxides per vehicle down, but
overall emissions increased due to larger number
of cars Lead emissions way down after switch to
unleaded gasoline
18Early Environmental Law Kepone
- Illustrates many of reasons why environmental law
is necessary - workplace health, air and water quality, consumer
exposure to hazardous chemicals - 1958 - Allied Chemical plants produced pesticide
known as Kepone - Company tested for toxicity highly toxic to
both rats and mice - caused cancer, liver damage, reproductive
failure, inhibition of growth and muscle
coordination
19Kepone
- Started commercial production in VA anyway
- More negative toxicity tests, increased
production - From 1966 to 1973 wastes were discharged directly
into the James River - Later, into municipal sewer system
20Kepone
- Numerous Health impacts on humans
- causes tremors, liver dysfunction, affects
reproductive system - 1975 - Doctor in Hopewell, VA made connection,
reported - 75 cases of acute Kepone poisoning
- Led to findings of serious contamination in
nearby land, water - one hundred miles of James River, portions of
Chesapeake Bay closed to fishing in 1975
21Kepone
- Variety of lawsuits against Allied
- plant workers, EPA, fishermen, etc.
- 10,500 plaintiffs suing for 85 billion
- Actual settlements unknown
- stipulation for out of court settlement was not
to divulge settlement amount - estimates are around 30 million
- Why did they get away with it for so long?
- Lack of enforcement mechanisms
- Plant located in poor area
- Case led to Clean Water Act of 1977
22Endangered Species Act
- 1973, 1982, 1895, 1988, 1995
- Example of roadblock statute
- very clear, unambiguous prohibition
- Revolutionary
- 1st piece of legislation anywhere to seriously
protect endangered species - A number of striking success stories
- bald eagle, American alligator, etc.
23ESA
- Three pronged approach
- 1. Bans import and sale of endangered species or
products - 2. Prohibits taking of any endangered species
- Cannot kill or capture endangered species
- Includes habitat modification and degradation
- 3. Prohibits federal agency programs and projects
that harm endangered species
24ESA
- Why protect species?
- Canaries in coal mine
- Morally right
- Potential resources
- They are keys to puzzles which we cannot yet
solve, and may provide answers to questions we
have not yet learned to ask. - House Resolution - Considerable backlash against ESA
- Interferes with land development, no obvious
human importance
25Tellico Dam Case
- Tennessee Valley Authority business groups vs.
citizens group including - farmers
- archaeologists
- Cherokee Indians
- Battle over construction of dam on Little
Tennessee River - 1960s-1980s
26(No Transcript)
27Cost Benefit Analysis (1968)
Conducted by the TVA
- Benefits
- Electrical Power 0.9 million
- Navigation Benefits 0.9 million
- Flood Control 1.1 million
- Recreation Benefits 3.7 million
- Water Supply (agric.) 0.2 million
- Employment Created 8.1 million
- Enhanced Land Value 1.6 million
- Costs
- Annualized Dam Cost 5 million
- Annualized Land Costs 0.0 million
- Net Benefits 11.5 million
28Tellico Dam
- TVA argued dam would provide recreation, promote
industrial development - Citizens groups 300 farm families in valley,
used by fishermen and canoeists, sacred to
Cherokees - Found endangered fish snail darter
- Project stopped by ESAs roadblock statute
29Tellico
- Supreme Court halts construction, reaction led to
creation of God Squad - Committee that can declare exceptions to ESA in
favor of economics - Had hearings on Tellico
- Developed own plan for development, showed
existing plan for dam seriously flawed - Request for exemption unanimously declined
- I hate to see the snail darter get the credit
for stopping a project that was ill-conceived and
uneconomic in the first place.
30Cost Benefit Analysis (1978)
- Benefits
- Electrical Power 2.7 million
- Navigation Benefits 2.7 million
- Flood Control 1.0 million
- Recreation Benefits 2.5 million
- Water Supply (agric.) 0.15 million
- Employment Created 0.0 million
- Enhanced Land Value 0.0 million
- Costs
- Annualized Dam Cost 3.2 million
- Annualized Land Costs 4.0 million
- Net Benefits -0.75 million
Conducted by the Endangered Species
Committee (God Squad)
31Tellico
- Tennessee Senator - slipped rider on
appropriations bill - Done at last minute, bill never read aloud
- Made Tellico Dam Project exempt from ESA
- Cherokees filed new lawsuit, was denied
- Dam completed
- No more snail darter in valley
- Later, other small populations found
- No industrial, little economic development
32Tellico
- Ecological Health Indicators atTellico
Reservoir, 2001 - Dissolved oxygen Poor
- Chlorophyll Poor
- Fish Fair
- Bottom life Poor
- Sediment Fair
33Points to Know Dec. 6
- What does it mean to have a governmental policy?
What 3 approaches can the government use to
regulate behavior? - What book is considered to have sparked the
modern environmental movement? Who wrote it and
what is it about? - What does the National Environmental Policy Act
do? What is its major strength? - What is Kepone? Why did it lead to the Clean
Water Act of 1977? - Why was/is the Endangered Species Act considered
revolutionary and controversial? - What is the God Squad, how did they rule in the
Tellico Dam case, and what was the final outcome?