Title: Debt Financing Alternatives for Todays Bioscience Company
1Debt Financing Alternatives for Todays
Bioscience Company
February 16, 2005
2Agenda
- Definition What It Is What It Is Used For
- Ascertaining Its Value Is Debt Worth It?
- Types of Financing, Typical Terms, Availability
- Separating Myth From Reality
- Some Gotchas How To Avoid Them
- Choosing a Provider Managing the Relationship
3What Is Senior / Venture Debt?
- Historical Definition Venture Leasing
- Todays Definition Any form of debt financing
provided to a company that is still dependent on
venture capital financing to fund its operations - Not just term debt anymore may include revolving
working capital financing
4Typical Uses of Venture Debt
- Literally speaking
- Financing Equipment
- General Corporate Purposes (Financing Anything)
- Financing Revenue Growth
- The Real Value Proposition Leveraging equity
capital in order to increase valuations between
equity rounds, reduce dilution, and enhance
investor return - Tangential Benefits
- Enhances appearance of financial stability and
staying power for prospective/existing
customers - Unlock restricted cash (landlord security
deposits, etc.)
5Ascertaining its Value Is Debt Worth It?
- For companies at all stages of development, the
answer is yes but conflicting viewpoints
abound! - Current Attitudes About Debt
- Were borrowing our own cash it doesnt add
runway - Too expensive / warrants coverage too high
- Gets repaid too quickly to help with
dilution/investor IRR - Doesnt make sense for pre-revenue companies
- Makes sense for pre-revenue companies, but only
in modest amounts - Makes sense for pre-revenue companies, but only
in gigantic amounts (more than 6 months cash
burn) - Makes sense for revenue-stage companies that need
to finance sales growth and/or enhance
credibility with existing and prospective
customers
6Defining the Value Proposition for Venture Debt
- How much debt and for what purpose?
- What is the potential impact on dilution?
- What are the other considerations?
- Are we being realistic?
7Defining the Value Proposition for Venture Debt
- The Bottom Line If the amount, purpose, and
cost/benefit analysis are making sense to you and
your board, and so long as your expectations
regarding the above are realistic, its time to
proceed!
8Types of Financing Venture Term Debt
- Advances for new and used equipment purchases, to
include some portion for soft costs - Draw periods of 0-12 months, followed by
repayment periods of 36 months (may be longer for
lab / test equipment) - May sometimes include an interest-only period
- May sometimes include a lower stream rate w/final
payment - May be specific lien on equipment financed or
first priority blanket lien on all assets (may
exclude IP) - May or may not be governed by financial covenants
- Pricing a function of debt terms and risk profile
of company - Available to companies that have raised Series A
and later, from both bank and non-bank providers
9Types of Financing Growth Capital
- Advances for anything no invoices required
- Draw periods, repayment periods, interest-only
periods, etc. are similar to equipment loans - First priority blanket lien on all assets (may
exclude IP, but less frequently than equipment
loans) - Typically no financial covenants
- Pricing a function of debt terms and risk profile
of company pricier than equipment loans - Available to Series A and B companies, from
select bank and non-bank providers availability
declines for companies at later stages of
development
10Types of Financing Working Capital
- Advances against eligible A/R other formula
options can include advances against inventory,
purchase orders, recurring revenue, contractual
payments, etc. - Generally revolving for a term of 12 months
payments of interest only with principal upon
maturity (renewable annually) may include other
costs - First priority blanket lien on all assets (may
exclude IP depending upon nature of IP) - May or may not be governed by financial
covenants, with pricing and degree of control
over collateral proceeds as the typical
trade-offs - Pricing a function of debt terms and risk profile
of company - Available to revenue-stage companies, from select
bank and non-bank providers (i.e., asset-based
lenders)
11Separating Myth From Reality
- The Myth Eliminating covenants and/or the MAC
clause will result in cheap equity - The Reality
- Debt is always debt, and can exit under certain
circumstances pay attention to other provisions
like insolvency clause, management rights, etc. - Covenants can be a good thing usually less
expensive, results in less ambiguity over what
constitutes an Event of Default
12Separating Myth From Reality
- The Myth Growth Capital is the most valuable
form of venture debt - The Reality
- Only if it doesnt block access to cheaper,
interest-only forms of working capital financing
upon reaching revenue stage - Pay attention to repayment terms v. timing/amount
of expected valuation increase
13Separating Myth From Reality
- The Myth Pledging the IP is Inappropriate
- The Reality
- Can be key to obtaining the greatest amount of
debt on the most favorable terms - May be essential in order for lender to perfect
its lien on A/R and inventory - Will not get in the way of maximizing the value
of the IP - May allow management and investors to preserve IP
in a bankruptcy scenario - Doesnt really give the lender any leverage they
dont already have it just feels that way
14Some Gotchas How To Avoid Them
- The Gotcha Growth Capital v. Working Capital
The Unforeseen Trade-Off - With one exception, a big slug of term debt today
may preclude you from obtaining cheap,
interest-only working capital financing upon
reaching revenue stage - Avoiding the Gotcha
- Choose a debt provider that offers the whole
spectrum of debt financing solutions for
companies at all stages of development - Negotiate a real carve-out for future working
capital financing
15Some Gotchas How To Avoid Them
- The Gotcha Big Debt is Better!
- Avoiding the Gotcha
- Yes if things go really, really well, however.
- Large amounts of debt can be an impediment to
future equity rounds - Smaller amounts of debt, to the extent that debt
service places a lower burden on cash burn, may
add more value than larger amounts of debt - Ensuring that debt service is no more than 10 of
cash burn in the early stages is prudent - The larger the amount of debt, the more the
choice of debt provider matters
16Some Gotchas How To Avoid Them
- The Gotcha Financial Covenant Misperceptions
- Avoiding the Gotcha
- Deals with covenants are often cheaper, but may
not add runway in certain instances - With a few exceptions, no-covenant deals will
become more scarce as the company progresses into
revenue stage and beyond - Covenants can largely eliminate the ambiguity
associated with the MAC clause, often with more
favorable terms - Where appropriate, ask your lender for covenant
and no-covenant options so as to better
understand the trade-offs relative to the
intended purpose
17Some Gotchas How To Avoid Them
- The Gotcha Not Understanding What Your Board
Wants - Avoiding the Gotcha
- Your board members have a perspective on debt
and hot buttons abound! - Reach a clear agreement as to the type of debt,
who should provide it, what the terms should look
like, and how the value proposition will be
defined prior to soliciting proposals
18Choosing a Debt Provider
- Things to Consider
- How are credit decisions made?
- What is their typical deal size/type?
- How much do they have available to lend?
- Transactional or relationship oriented?
- How is their reputation?
- Are they in trouble?
- Do Your Due Diligence
- Get references, and actually call them!
- Check with your board, other service providers,
and former/current borrowers - Review financials, press releases, etc. if
applicable
19Managing the Relationship
- Meet with your lender regularly provide updates
as to how the company is doing, what the board is
thinking, etc. treat them like a partner - Provide all required financial and collateral
reporting in a timely manner - Avoid surprises
- Communicate, Communicate, Communicate!