Title: Enforcement
1Update Enforcement of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
HIPAA SummitAugust 19, 2008
2Topics
- Enforcement Program
- First Resolution Agreement
- Other Activities
- Genetic non-discrimination
- Patient Safety Act
- Nationwide Health Information Network
3Health Information Privacy Complaints Received by
Calendar Year
4Pie Chart All Complaints
5(No Transcript)
6Pie Chart Total Investigated
7Resolution Agreement
- July 15, 2008 HHS entered into Resolution
Agreement (RA) with Providence Health Services - First RA reached for Security or Privacy Rule
enforcement - Agreement terms included
- Resolution amount of 100,000
- Corrective Action Plan
8Providence Health Services
- Health care system based in Seattle, Washington
- The incidents giving rise to the agreement
involved two entities within the system - Providence Home and Community Services and
- Providence Hospice and Home Care
9HIPAA Privacy Rule Complaint Process
DOJ
Accepted by DOJ
Complaint
Possible Criminal Violation
DOJ declines case refers back to OCR
Resolution
Intake Review
Possible Privacy Rule Violation
Investigation
OCR finds no violation OCR obtains voluntary
compliance, corrective action, or other
agreement OCR issues formal finding of violation
Possible Security Rule Violation
CMS OCR coordinate investigation of overlap
cases
CMS
Resolution
Resolution
The violation did not occur after April 14,
2003 Entity is not covered by the Privacy
Rule Complaint was not filed within 180 days and
an extension was not granted The incident
described in the complaint does not violate the
Privacy Rule
10What is a Resolution Agreement?
- A contract signed by HHS and a covered entity in
which the covered entity agrees to perform
certain obligations (e.g., staff training) and
make reports to HHS, generally for a period of
three years. - During the period, HHS monitors the compliance of
the covered entity with its obligations. - RA likely will include payment of a resolution
amount. - These agreements are reserved for investigations
with more serious outcomes. - RA is the "other agreement" provided for at 45
CFR 160.312(a) Informal means may include
demonstrated compliance or a completed corrective
action plan or other agreement.
11Is it a CMP? No
- CMPs arise only out of the formal resolution
process, which provides right to an
Administrative Law Judge hearing and a
Departmental Appeals Board appeal. - The resolution amount CAP are voluntary actions
taken by Providence to resolve the matter to the
satisfaction of HHS without having to move to a
formal enforcement process. An RA is an informal
resolution.
- Negotiated agreement settled investigation
without having to impose a civil money penalty. - Not an admission of liability by Providence nor a
concession by HHS.
12How does this differ from usual resolution?
- Usually Privacy Rule investigations that find
indications of potential violations are concluded
to the satisfaction of OCR - when the entity completes certain voluntary
compliance actions, and - OCR notifies the person who filed the complaint
and the covered entity in writing of the
resolution result. - Resolution Agreement with a Corrective Action
Plan is the next level of enforcement process. - This written agreement is negotiated in those
cases when we are not able to reach a
satisfactory resolution through the covered
entitys demonstrated compliance and/or
corrective action through other informal means.
13Why not impose a CMP?
- Cooperation by Providence throughout
investigation meant that HHS could satisfactorily
resolve issues through informal resolution. - Case resolved prior to the issuance of a Notice
of Proposed Determination and the imposition of a
CMP, which is formal enforcement. - Resolution Agreement is a settlement of the
investigation and matter.
14Investigation
- Triggered by 31 complaints submitted to OCR and
CMS - Complaints merged into joint compliance reviews
by CMS and OCR - Practices of entities created vulnerabilities
that led to massive impermissible disclosures
through multiple thefts
15Incidents
- Series of five incidents, September 2005 to March
2006 - Electronic information that was not encrypted or
otherwise properly safeguarded was lost or stolen - Backup tapes, optical disks, and laptops, all
containing unencrypted electronic PHI, were
removed from the Providence premises and left
unattended - Media laptops then lost or stolen, compromising
the PHI of over 386,000 patients
16Why a RA in this case?
- Management lapses
- On non-encryption, the entity had a policy that
was not being followed - On loss of backup media, the practice of taking
media home by employees without reasonable
safeguards was not consistent with policy, but
was known by the information system managers and
allowed to continue over long period of time - Affected a very large number of patients386,000
17Corrective Action Plan
- Requires Providence to
- Revise its policies, procedures re physical
technical safeguards (e.g., encryption) governing
off-site transport and storage of electronic
media --backup electronic media and portable
devices-- containing patient information - subject to HHS approval
- Train workforce members on safeguards
- conduct audits and site visits of facilities
- submit compliance reports to HHS for period of
three years
18Lessons learned
- Effective compliance with the Privacy Security
Rules means more than just having written
policies and procedures - HHS willing to work with cooperative entities to
implement effective changes to ensure that
consumers are protected.
- Covered entities need to continuously monitor
implementation - Covered entities need to ensure that these
efforts include effective privacy and security
staffing, employee training and physical and
technical features
19Part of overall enforcement strategy
- Resolution Agreement one of several effective
enforcement tools, to be used on case by case
basis - Covered entities that are not in compliance with
the Privacy and Security Rules may face similar
action
20Complaint Investigations
- Every complaint received by OCR is reviewed
allegations analyzed - An investigation is launched when warranted by
the facts and circumstances presented by the
complaint - OCR investigations have resulted in changes in
privacy practices and other corrective actions in
over 6,xxx cases since April 2003 - Corrective action obtained by HHS from covered
entities has resulted in systemic change that
benefits all individuals they serve
21Tips for CE Privacy Officers During an OCR
Investigation
- When you receive notification letter, contact
investigator. - Respond within stated time frames.
- If you are aware of a privacy incident, formulate
execute a corrective action plan, even if you
have not yet received a notification letter. - Be specific in your responses to requests for
data information. - Be forthcoming and acknowledge errors.
- Be cooperative, ask for technical assistance if
needed. - Remember, the goal is resolution through
voluntary compliance
22Our Mutual Goal
- Ensuring the privacy of each individuals health
information in accordance with the standards and
requirements of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
23Other Challenges
24Genetic Information--GINA
- Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act
(signed into law May 21, 2008) - To protect individuals from discrimination in
health insurance and employment on the basis of
genetic information - Mandates modification of the Privacy Rule to
incorporate provisions specific to genetic
information - Genetic information is protected health
information - Disallow the use or disclosure of genetic
information for underwriting - Privacy Rule Modifications anticipated in 2009
25Genetic Information -- HHS Personalized Health
Care Initiative
- Creating privacy and nondiscrimination
protections to advance genomic research for gene
based medicine and health care - Through AHIC, looking at how to use HIT to
advance personalized health care
26Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act
Establishes reporting systems for patient safety
events -- information can be aggregated, assessed
to improve overall patient safety quality of
care. Final rule expected by the end of 2008.
- Creates Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs),
entities recognized by the Secretary to collect
analyze patient safety events reported by health
care providers - Provides Federal privilege confidentiality
protections for "patient safety work product - HHS Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ) to administer rules for listing qualified
PSOs - OCR to enforce confidentiality provisions
27Nationwide Health Information Network
- Privacy and Security Are Integral to NHIN
- Necessary for Public Trust
- Public Participation Is Engine for Adoption
- HIPAA Levels Playing Field
- Nationally Accepted Standards for Privacy and
Security Already in Place - Uniform National Baseline of Protection More Is
Still Good
28NHIN Privacy
- HIPAA Privacy Rule as Facilitator Not Obstacle
to Health IT adoption - Standards Reflect Many Hard Choices Balancing
Privacy and Access in Healthcare Setting - Narrows Privacy Debate to New Areas of Risk and
Opportunity for Consumers - Flexibility Allows Rules to Adapt to HIE Needs
without Lowering Baseline for All
29Gaps for Privacy NHIN
- Uniformity How Much Is Really Needed
- Preemption
- Harmonizing Federal and State Laws
- Ex Consents
- Flexible and Scalable Standards
- Harmonizing Business Practices
- Example Minimum Necessary
- Privacy and Security Solutions for Interoperable
Health Information Exchange - Looking for Answers
30Gaps for Privacy NHIN
- Accountability
- New Players Typically Not Covered by HIPAA
- Certain Health Care Providers
- Providers of Network Services
- Providers of Data Management Services
- Providers of PHR Services
- Can Business Associate Contracts Work and Provide
Adequate Accountability in the NHIN? - Will Proposed Legislation in Congress Make These
Covered Entities Under HIPAA?
31Want More Information?
The OCR website, http//www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/
offers a wide range of helpful information about
the Privacy Rule
- The full text of the Privacy Rule
- A HIPAA Privacy Rule summary
- Frequently asked questions
- Fact sheets
- OCR enforcement program information