CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16

Description:

2. Common question of law or fact ... AT ANY STAGE OF THE ACTION (subject only to need to protect parties from unfair prejudice) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:16
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: susanna93
Category:
Tags: civil | class | procedure | fact

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16


1
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 16
  • Professor Fischer
  • Columbus School of Law
  • The Catholic University of America
  • October 1, 2003

2
PROGRESS FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK v. NATWEST CB p.
306
  • Limits on sanctions under Rule 11

3
LIMITS ON MONETARY SANCTIONS
  • 1. When are monetary sanctions unavailable
    against a REPRESENTED PARTY?
  • What subsection of FRCP 11 governs?
  • 2. Cannot award monetary sanctions sua sponte if
    show cause order issued before any voluntary
    settlement or dismissal
  • 3. Court must consider financial status of a Rule
    11 offender
  • 4. Duty to mitigate

4
SANCTIONS ORDERS
  • What does 11(c)(3) provide?

5
THE BIG PICTURE
  • Pleading
  • Joinder

6
JOINDER OF CLAIMS AND JOINDER OF PARTIES
  • Which rule(s) govern these?
  • Is it easier to join claims or parties?

7
LIMITS ON JOINDER
  • General policy of FRCP- liberal joinder rules BUT
  • Other rules may limit joinder. What are some
    examples?

8
FRCP 18 JOINDER OF CLAIMS
  • ISSUE What claims can a party bring against
    another party in the same action?
  • Can a party bring unrelated claims against
    another party in the same action?

9
APPLICATION OF FRCP 18
  • FRCP 18 applies to
  • P v. D
  • Third-party P v. Third-party D
  • D1 v. D2
  • D v. P

10
FRCP 18 PERMISSIVE OR MANDATORY?
  • MUST a P bring all unrelated claims against D in
    a single action? (please forget about
    counterclaims for now)Why?
  • Important Note related claims may be barred by
    claim preclusion. Well learn about this later.
  • Another Important Note Court can order separate
    trials under FRCP 42(b)

11
JOINDER OF PARTIES
  • Some parties MUST be joined (FRCP 19)
  • Other parties may be joined if permissive
    joinder rules apply (FRCP 20)

12
Kedra Case CB p. 315
  • Could all the Kedras be joined as Ps along with
    the Rozanskis?
  • Could all the defendants be joined in the same
    action?
  • Why or why not?

13
PERMISSIVE JOINDER FRCP 20
  • Parties are generally masters of their claims
  • ISSUE When can P sue together?
  • ISSUE When can P sue several Ds together in the
    same action?

14
WHEN CAN Ps SUE TOGETHER?
  • IF
  • 1. Claims arise out of same transaction and
    occurrence or series of transactions or
    occurrences AND
  • 2. Common question of law or fact
  • subject to discretion of court to deny joinder
    where JURY CONFUSION or UNDUE DELAY (20(b))
  • NOTE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RULES MAY AFFECT
    THIS- WE WILL DISCUSS LATER

15
WHEN CAN P SUE MULTIPLE Ds IN SAME ACTION?
  • IF
  • 1. Claims arise out of same transaction and
    occurrence or series of transactions or
    occurrences AND
  • 2. Common question of law or fact
  • subject to discretion of court to deny joinder
    where JURY CONFUSION or UNDUE DELAY (20(b))

16
RULE 20 IS PERMISSIVE
  • Parties are not required to be joined (subject
    to FRCP 19)
  • However, courts sometimes CONSOLIDATE actions
    (FRCP 42(a)) where they share common questions of
    law or fact
  • Courts also have discretion to deny joinder and
    order separate trials (FRCP 20(b))

17
FRCP 21 MISJOINDER OF PARTIES UNDER RULE 20
  • Misjoinder will not result in dismissal
  • Parties can be dropped (severed) or added
  • 1. On motion of parties
  • 2. Or at initiative of court
  • AT ANY STAGE OF THE ACTION (subject only to need
    to protect parties from unfair prejudice)
  • COURT HOWEVER CAN ORDER SEPARATE TRIALS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com