New Guidelines streamline Diabetes Diagnosis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

New Guidelines streamline Diabetes Diagnosis

Description:

One approach is to choose the drug appropriate for the stage of the disease ... Is the patient is still gaining weight at the time of diagnosis ? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: david2671
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Guidelines streamline Diabetes Diagnosis


1
New GuidelinesstreamlineDiabetes Diagnosis
  • Clev Clin J Med 19986510-12

2
Guideline Development
  • 1979 National Diabetes Data Group
  • 1997 American Diabetes Association

Diabetes 1979281039-1057Diabetes Care
1997201183-1197
3
National Diabetes Data Group
  • Issued in 1979
  • fasting plasma glucose gt 140 mg/dl
  • 2 hr glucose tolerance test gt 200 mg/dl
  • tests not equivalent only 1/4 of patients with
    abnormal GTT have abnormal FBS
  • GTT is expensive, time-consuming, inconvenient
  • FBS is more reliable and consistent

Diabetes 1979281039-1057
4
American Diabetes Association
  • Report of the Expert Committee on the
    Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes
    Mellitus
  • Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197

5
American Diabetes Association
  • Issued in 1997
  • fasting plasma glucose gt126 mg/dl
  • glucose tolerance test not used
  • simplify the diagnostic process
  • identify more patients with previously
    unidentified diabetes

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
6
ADA criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes
mellitus
  • Symptoms of diabetes (polyuria, polydipsia,
    unexplained weight loss) plus a casual plasma
    glucose concentration ? 200 mg/dl
  • A fasting plasma glucose concentration ? 126
    mg/dl (measured after at least 8 hours of no
    caloric intake)
  • An abnormal oral glucose tolerance test result (a
    plasma glucose concentration ? 200 mg/dl two
    hours after a glucose load of 75 grams of
    anhydrous glucose dissolved in water)

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
7
Usefulness of Hemoglobin A1cfor follow-up but
not for screening
  • HbA1c level reflect long-term glucose level
    useful in the follow-up of diabetics
  • Problems
  • methods not standardized for all labs
  • abnormal low values in patients with abnormal
    hemoglobins or those with reduced red blood cell
    life span

8
Who should be screened?
  • Prevalence of diabetes (ages 40-74)
  • 12.27 using the 1979 criteria
  • 14.26 using the 1997 criteria
  • Currently, only 50 of diabetics are identified
  • Earlier identification and treatment may lead to
    fewer complications

The 3rd National Health and Nutrition Survey
9
Who should be screened?
  • Consider testing all persons age 45 and older (if
    normal, repeat every 3 years)
  • Consider testing at a younger age, or more
    frequently, for higher risk individuals

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
10
Who should be screened?high risk patients
  • Obese persons (? 120 desired body wt or body
    mass index ? 27 kg/m2)
  • first-degree relatives with diabetes
  • high-risk ethnic groups (African Americans,
    Hispanic, American Indians)
  • mothers of babies weighing ? 9 lb at birth
  • women with a history of gestational diabetes

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
11
Who should be screened?high risk patients
  • hypertensive patients (? 140/90)
  • dyslipidemic patients (HDL ? 35 mg/dl or
    triglyceride ? 250 mg/dl or both)
  • patients with previous finding of impaired
    glucose tolerance (140-199 mg/dl on 2-hr test) or
    impaired fasting glucose (110-125 mg/dl)

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
12
Old Nomenclatureclassification by disease
treatment
  • Discard the use of IDDM (insulin-dependent
    DM)NIDDM (non-insulin-dependent DM)
  • classification based on treatment
  • not all patients fit into either category

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
13
New Nomenclatureclassification by disease process
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • due to beta cell destruction, usually leading to
    absolute insulin deficiency
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • range from predominantly insulin resistance with
    relative insulin deficiency to predominantly
    secretory defect with insulin resistance

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
14
New Nomenclatureclassification by disease process
  • Other types of diabetes
  • specific genetic defects, diseases of the
    exocrine pancreas, endocrinopathies, drugs or
    chemicals, infections, immune-mediated diseases
  • Gestational diabetes
  • screen women at high risk (age gt25, obesity,
    family history, ethnic groups)

Diabetes Care 1997201183-1197
15
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Sulfonylreas
  • increase insulin secretion by the pancreas
  • Acarbose
  • delay carbohydrate absorption by inhibiting
    enzymes that break down starches in the small
    intestine

16
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Metformin
  • decrease hepatic glucose production
  • increase insulin sensitivity in muscle cells
  • Troglitazone
  • increase insulin sensitivity
  • isolated reports of severe hepatotoxicity

17
Toward rational use of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
  • One approach is to choose the drug appropriate
    for the stage of the disease based on the natural
    history of type 2 diabetes

18
Natural history of Type 2 diabetes
  • Early phase
  • ? insulin sensitivity
  • gradual rise in blood glucose
  • ? insulin secretion to compensate
  • Late phase
  • ? insulin levels as beta cell wears out
  • sharp rise in blood sugar level

19
Natural history of Type 2 diabetes Clue to
disease progression
  • Weight gain
  • Is the patient is still gaining weight at the
    time of diagnosis ?
  • weight gain, in the absence of therapy, indicates
    that the patient still has adequate insulin
    secretion

20
Toward rational use of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
  • General guidelines
  • monitor FBS and HbA1c at regular intervals (2 - 4
    times / yr) and adjust treatment as needed
  • Treatment guided by disease stage
  • early phase acarbose, metformin, troglitazone
  • late phase sulfonylureas and insulin

21
Toward rational use of Oral Hypoglycemic Agents
  • A M T S
  • Postprandial ? sugar
  • Liver disease -- --
  • Obese patients
  • Kidney disease --
  • Elderly patients
  • FBS gt 200 mg/dl

A acarbose, M metformin, T troglitazone, S
sulfonylureas favored or indicated,
low-dose, -- avoid
22
References
  • Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and
    Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes
    Care 1997201183-1197.
  • National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and
    diagnosis of diabetes and other categories of
    glucose intolerance.Diabetes 1979281039-1057.
  • Comparison of fasting and 2-hour glucose and
    HBA1c levels for diagnosing diabetes diagnostic
    criteria and performance revisited.Engelgau MM,
    Thompson TJ, et al. Diabetes Care
    199720785-791.
  • New guidelines streamline diabetes diagnosis.
    Reddy S.Clev Clinic j Med 199865(1)10-12.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com