PROLEARN General Assembly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

PROLEARN General Assembly

Description:

Financial Information: January 28, 2006. Draft sent: January 28, 2006 ... Time of completion (no draft)- Month 30, 36, 42. Inline with overall PROLEARN objectives ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: prolear
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PROLEARN General Assembly


1
PROLEARN General Assembly
  • Administrative Session
  • Martin Wolpers
  • Katharina Pechtold
  • Effie Law

2
Overview
  • Budget and Person Month
  • Timelines
  • Review process/deadlines
  • Annual report
  • Review
  • Update JPA JPA3
  • Events
  • General Assemblies 2006
  • other

3
Budget
4
Person Efforts
5
Distribution of Money
  • More money than requested this year (150k)
  • ? less money in year 4
  • Suggestion
  • Use as buffer for additional activities, e.g.
    EC-TEL2006

6
Annual Report and Review
  • Annual Report
  • Industry involvement
  • Internal Integration
  • Q8 Reports January 14, 2006
  • Activity Reports January 14, 2006
  • Financial Information January 28, 2006
  • Draft sent January 28, 2006
  • Audit Certificates February 7, 2006
  • Submission to EC February 14, 2006
  • Review
  • Review Preparation meeting March 21, 2006
  • Reviewers_at_L3S March 21 to March 24, 2006
  • Review_at_L3S March 22 to March 23 whole day
    (9-17)

7
Peer Review of Deliverables
Substantial Changes Required
07.01.06
28.01.06
17.12.05
31.12.05
8
Research Report and Update JPA
  • Research report
  • Input by November 22, 2005
  • First draft by November 30, 2005
  • Corrections by December 12, 2005
  • Publication by December 19, 2005 (at Roadmap
    event in Greece)
  • Update JPA
  • Industry and internal integration
  • Deliverable input by November 28, 2005
  • 1st Draft distributed by December 20, 2005
  • 2nd Draft by January 14, 2006
  • Corrections by January 21, 2006
  • Final version by February 14, 2006

9
Deliverables Suggestions
  • Deliverable driven workpackage definition
    outlining the topics of partners
  • 1 or more deliverables championed per partner
    with at least 3 contributing partners
  • Include
  • Title
  • Participating partners (leader and at least 3)
  • Estimated effort per partner in person months
  • Brief description (not more than ¼ page)
  • Time of completion (no draft)- Month 30, 36, 42
  • Inline with overall PROLEARN objectives
  • Suggestion for work package

10
Deadlines
  • November 22, 2005
  • Input Research Report
  • November 28, 2005
  • Deliverable suggestions
  • Draft Research Report
  • December 14, 2005
  • Distribute list of deliverables
  • Corrections Research Report
  • December 17, 2005
  • Deliverable to peer reviewer
  • December 19, 2005
  • Publication Research Report
  • 1st Draft JPA
  • January 7, 2006
  • Deliverable reports to authors
  • January 14, 2006
  • 2. Draft JPA3
  • Q8 Reports
  • Activity Reports for Annual Report
  • January 21, 2006
  • Corrections Draft JPA3
  • January 28, 2006
  • Submission of deliverables to EC
  • Financial Information
  • Draft Annual Report
  • February 7, 2006
  • Audit Certificates and Form C
  • February 14, 2006
  • Submission JPA3, Annual Report, etc. to EC
  • March 22/23, 2006
  • Review at L3S

All Deadlines also at
11
Next Events
  • General Assemblies
  • Last week April/first week of May TWS? ? Paris?
  • In Greece on October 6/7 in Greece
  • Review preparation meeting on March 22 in
    Hannover
  • OnlineEduca 2005, Nov. 30 to Dec. 2 in Germany
  • eLearning Technologies and Ariadne GA
  • VCC Conference, December 7 in Germany
  • Roadmap Expert Symposium, December 19/20 in
    Greece
  • Learntec 2006, February 14-16 in Germany
  • Professional Learning, February 14/15 in Germany
  • CeBIT 2006, March 9-15 in Germany
  • Eden conf. in Vienna , beginning of June
  • Summer School 2006, June in Slovenia
  • EC-TEL 2006, October 1-7 in Greece

12
The End
13
New partners
  • New partners must be approved by GA
  • 75 of present partners must agree according to
    Consortium Agreement (Art. 6, Pp. 6 7)
  • Parties represented
  • OU NL
  • Yes
  • No
  • undecided
  • im-C AG
  • Yes
  • No
  • undecided
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com