Title: THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH
1THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH
- SUSAN HAACK
- ltshaack_at_law.miami.edugt
2Much truth is spoken, that more may be
concealed Mr. Justice Darling
3two uses of truth
- as an abstract noun, referring to the concept of
truth, trueness (or the meaning of true and
its synonyms in other languages) - as a concrete noun, referring to beliefs,
propositions, statements, theories, etc., that
are true
4in the second, concrete use
- the word takes the indefinite article, a truth
- the plural form, truths
5for example
it is a truth universally acknowledged, that a
single man in possession of a good fortune must
be in want of a wife. Jane Austen, Pride and
Prejudice
6We hold these truths to be self-evident, that
all men are created equal . American
Declaration of independence
71. Trouble with Truth Truths
- we speak of true propositions, beliefs, etc., but
also of - true friends, true believers ( faithful)
- true likenesses (as of passport photo)
8we also say things like
- the frog is not a true reptile ( not really a
reptile) - these plants breed true ( the offspring are
just like the parents) - truing the wheels on a bicycle ( straightening
them)
9no doubt related to the locution
out of true ( askew, crooked), as with a
picture hung at an angle
10 a famous movie is called
True Grit ( real determination) from the
metaphor/idiom gritting your teeth
11truth cant be identified
- with acceptance-as-true
- nor with belief, not even warranted belief
- nor with agreement
- nor with sincerity
12the belief that Smith is either a liar or a fool
is true if Smith is either a liar or a fool and
not otherwise Frank Ramsey
13Ramseys account
- though often called a redundancy theory
- does NOT say it is true that is redundant
- it is not redundant e.g., in Plato said some
true things and some false things
14it might be better called
the laconicist theory since laconic in
English means terse, short
derives from the Greek word Laconia, the name
for the ancient city-state of Sparta
15it is not a complete theory
- it requires an account of propositional
quantifiers, which must not itself rely on the
concept of truth - it leaves open large questions about
representation (what makes this the proposition
that p) reality
16but it suffices to explain
- what I mean by saying that there are many truths,
but only one truth(-concept) - that some truths are about things of our
making, but truth is independent of us, objective
17- that some truths make sense only relative to
culture, community, legal system, etc. - but truth is not relative
18for example
- it was once true, but since 1832 is no longer
true, that in English law the penalty for
stealing a sheep was death - this is the origin of the expression might as
well be hung for a sheep as a lamb
19i.e.
if youre going to take a big risk, better it be
for the chance of a big reward than a small one!
20or, another example
- it was true until January 2005, but is no longer
true - that in Michigan law the standard of
admissibility of novel scientific testimony was
general acceptance in the field to which it
belongs
21again
- while some truths are vague, truth is not a
matter of degree - while some truths are partial, truth does not
decompose into parts
22there are many kinds of vagueness
- of predicates (tall, bald, intelligent)
- of nouns (heap, crowd)
- of adverbs (fairly, normally)
- of quantifiers (a few, many, several)
23- there is non-gradational vagueness, eg., of
buzzwords like funky - the vagueness of philosophical terms that have
lost meaning through multiple ambiguity
(realism, relativism, reliabilism)
24 there are two meanings of partially true
- part of p is true as in she was poor but
she was honest if she was poor, but not honest,
or honest but not poor - p is part of the truth in this sense every
proposition is only partially true
25so, what are we asking
- when we require a witness to tell the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth? - not that he tell the whole truth about
everything - but that he tell the truth, as he believes it to
be, without relevant omissions
26that some propositions are only partly true
- doesnt mean truth decomposes into parts
- a partial truth in the 1st sense (true in part)
is, strictly, just plain false - a partial truth in the 2nd sense (part of the
truth) is, strictly, just plain true
272. Problems with Partial Truth, Some Vagaries
of Vagueness
- this throws light on the question of truth in
history - any account of a past event is bound to be
incomplete, convey only part of the truth about
what really happened
28- may mislead because of its incompleteness, but
- that doesnt mean that no historical account can
be true (so far as it goes)
29why is incomplete evidence misleading?
If I knew what was important to know and what
wasnt, Id have this thing pretty much solved
Spenser, Robert B. Parkers laconic private
detective
Robert B. Parker
30 of course
There are the knowns, the unknowns, and the
unknown unknowns Donald Rumsfeld, former U.S.
Secretary of Defense
31a novelist makes the point precisely
The truth is not a line from here to there,
and not ever-widening circles like the rings on a
sawn log, but rather trails of overlapping
liquids that poured forth but then assumed a
shape and life of their own, that circled around
in spirals and fluctuations to touch and color
all truths that came out after that. Jeffrey
Lent
32this is exactly what happens in the novel, as
more truths come out
33now we see
- a connection between out of true and slanted
- why partial means both incomplete and
biased - why colorable has two almost opposite meanings
34vagueness may be
- inadvertent, or deliberate
- if deliberate
- benign, or
- intended to evade or mislead
35similarly
- partial truth may be inadvertent or deliberate
- if deliberate
- benign (e.g., tactful)
- or intended to deceive
36It is not in human nature to deceive others, for
any long time, without, in a measure, deceiving
ourselves Cardinal Newman
37 It is not in human nature to fudge issues to
others, for any long time, without, in a measure,
fudging them in ones own mind too SH
38as I see it
- deliberately (or quasi-deliberately) withholding
part of the truth, with benign intent - is analogous to a white lie
- i.e., a small lie told to avoid hurting someones
feelings
39but
- deliberately or quasi-deliberately withholding
part of the truth with intent to deceive - is just as bad as a plain old black lie
40however
- telling only part of the truth is psychologically
easier than flat-out lying - because you can tell yourself you arent lying
- after all, everything you say is true!
41one example of many
- drug companies have no obligation to publish
unfavorable studies - in fact often publish only the good news
- as a result of which doctors have prescribed a
drug when it is inappropriate or even dangerous
42a commentator observes
Too often, chief executives sugarcoat the truth.
Thats more dangerous than ever Many times
its the thing not said that gets a CEO in
trouble
43sadly
- deliberate and quasi-deliberate deception by
partial truth seems ubiquitous much commoner
than the Lie Direct - in business, in advertising, in politics
- even, Im afraid, in universities
44thank you for your invitation, and for your
attention!