Title: Astrobiology
1Astrobiology Wednesday, March 19, 2008 The
Search for Life in the Solar System The Planet
Mars
2The Search For Biosignatures On Mars
3The Search for Biosignatures on Mars
There are three direct methods for investigating
life in the solar system
Methodology
- in-situ investigation
- meteorites
- sample return missions
4Missions to Mars
Launch Date Name Country Result 1960 Oct. 10,
1960 Korabl 4 USSR Failed in Earth orbit Oct. 14,
1960 Korabl 5 USSR Failed in Earth
orbit 1962 Oct. 24, 1962 Korabl 11 USSR Failed to
leave Earth orbit Nov. 1, 1962 Mars 1 USSR Lost
communications Nov. 4, 1962 Korabl
13 USSR Failed in Earth orbit, reentered Nov.
5 1964 Nov. 5, 1964 Mariner 3 USA Launch failure,
entered solar orbit Nov. 28, 1964 Mariner
4 USA Reached Mars July 15, photographs/atmospheri
c measurements Nov. 30, 1964 Zond 2 USSR Lost
communications May 1965 1965 July 18, 1965 Zond
3 USSR Photographed Moon, reached Mars
orbit 1969 Feb. 24, 1969 Mariner 6 USA Flyby July
31 successful mission Mar. 27, 1969 Mariner
7 USA Flyby Aug. 5 successful mission Mar. 27,
1969 none USSR Failed believed launch
failure Apr. 14, 1969 none USA Failed 1971 May 8,
1971 Mariner 8 USA Failed to reach orbit May 10,
1971 Kosmos USSR Failed to leave Earth orbit
reentered May 10 May 19, 1971 Mars 2 USSR Orbited
Mars descent module crashed Nov. 27 May 28,
1971 Mars 3 USSR Orbited Mars descent module
failed upon landing Dec. 2 May 30, 1971 Mariner
9 USA Orbited Mars Nov. 13 successful
mission 1973 July 21, 1973 Mars 4 USSR Failed to
orbit, flew by Feb. 10 July 25, 1973 Mars
5 USSR Entered orbit of Mars Feb. 12 partially
successful mission
5Missions to Mars
Launch Date Name Country Result
1973 Aug. 5, 1973 Mars 6
USSR Flyby descent module communications failed
landing Mar. 12 Aug. 9, 1973 Mars 7
USSR Failed, flew by Mars 1975 Aug. 20,
1975 Viking 1 USA Orbited 1976 June
19 landed July 20 Sept. 5, 1975 Viking 2
USA Orbited 1976 Aug. 7 landed Sept.
3 1988 Aug. 5, 1988 Phobos 1
USSR Lost contact Aug. 31 Aug. 9, 1988 Phobos 2
USSR Orbited Mars 1989 Jan. 29 lost
contact Mar. 27 1992 Sept. 25, 1992 Mars Observer
USA Lost contact Aug. 21, 1993 1996 Nov. 7,
1996 Mars Global USA Arrived Sept,
1997, Prime mission began March, 1999
Surveyor and ended January, 2001. Still
in operation. Nov. 16, 1996 Mars 96
Russia Failed orbit insertion, fell to Earth Nov.
18. Dec. 4, 1996 Mars Pathfinder USA Landed
July 4, 1997, one year mission exceeded
goals. 1998Jul. 4, 1998 Nozomi
Japan Failed to orbit December, 2003 Dec. 11,
1998 Mars Surveyor 98 Mars Climate Orbiter USA
Lost contact September, 1999 1999 Jan. 3,
1999 Mars Surveyor 98 - Mars Polar Lander
USA Lost contact December 3, 1999
6Missions to Mars
Launch Date Name Country Result
2001 April 7, 2001 Mars Odyssey
USA Orbited October 24, 2001, still in
operation. 2003 June 1, 2003 Mars Express
Europe Arrived December 26, 2003
Beagle 2
Contact lost during landing. June 10, 2003 MER
- Spirit USA Landed January 2,
2004. Mission in progress.July 24, 2003 MER -
Opportunity USA Landed January 24, 2004. Mission
in progress. 2005 August 12, 2005 Mars
Reconnaissance Orbiter USA Arrived Mars,
February 3, 2006
See also - http//phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/timeline
.php
7Future Missions to Mars
2007 to 2009 Phoenix Launched August 2007 -
Small Mars scout lander (NASA) Phobos-Grunt -
October 2009 - Mars orbiter and Phobos sample
return (Russia) Mars Science Laboratory - 2009 -
Mars Rover (NASA) Beagle 2 Evolution - 2009 -
Mars Lander (ESA) 2010s ExoMars - 2011 - Mars
Rover (ESA) Mars 2011 - 2011 - Mars Scout
mission (NASA) Astrobiology Field Laboratory -
2016 - Mars Rover - proposed (NASA) Mars Sample
Return Mission - delayed until at least 2016,
more probably to 2024 - planned mission by ESA
and NASA as part of the Aurora Programme
8Mariner Missions to Mars
- Mariner 4 was the fourth in a series of
spacecraft used for planetary exploration in a
flyby mode and in 1965 represented the first
successful flyby of the planet Mars, returning
the first pictures of the Martian surface.
showing a moonlike cratered terrain without any
signs of vegetation, and measured atmosphere and
temperatures much less comfortable for most
creatures on Earth - the first Mars orbiter, Mariner 9, revived some
hope for all those considering life on Mars - Mariner 9 mapped virtually the whole planet and
found a diversity of forms, including high
volcanoes, huge canyons, extended chaotic terrain
and dry river beds indicating the former presence
of huge quantities of water on ancient young
planet Mars
9The Search for Biosignatures on Mars
NASA Missions Viking 1 and 2
10The Search for Biosignatures on Mars
- if we wish to search for life on Mars, we will
need to study actual soil samples from Mars to
see whether it contains living microbes - this type of search was first carried out by the
two NASA Viking landers in 1976
11Landing Sites of NASA Viking 1 and 2
Viking 2
Viking 1
Mars Pathfinder
MER Opportunity
MER Spirit
12Viking 1 and 2
Viking lander
Launch of Viking 1, August, 1975
13The view of Mars from Viking Lander 1. The large
rock is about 2 m across.
14The view of Mars from Viking Lander 2.
15Viking 1 and 2 Primary Mission Objectives
- NASA's Viking Mission to Mars was composed of two
spacecraft, Viking 1 and Viking 2, each
consisting of an orbiter and a lander - the primary mission objectives were to obtain
high resolution images of the Martian surface,
characterize the structure and composition of the
atmosphere and surface, and search for evidence
of life
16Viking 1 and 2
- INVESTIGATIONS INSTRUMENTS
- Orbiter imaging Two vidicon
cameras - Water vapor mapping Infrared
spectrometer - Thermal mapping Infrared
radiometer - Entry science
- Ionospheric properties Retarding potential
analyzer - Atmospheric composition Mass spectrometer
- Atmospheric structure Pressure, temperature
- Lander imaging Two facsimile cameras
- and acceleration sensors
- Biological analyses
- Metabolism Three separate experiments,
- Growth gas exchange, labeled release,
Photosynthesis and pyrolytic release, were
included to test different biological
models.
17Viking 1 and 2 - Background
- from a biological point of view, the Viking
mission to Mars can be interpreted as a test of
the Oparin-Haldane hypothesis of chemical
evolution - assuming that the early histories of Mars and
Earth were similar, and that terrestrial life
appears to have originated on Earth very early
from materials that could well have been present
also on Mars - it is not unreasonable to assume
that chemical evolution, leading to complex
organic compounds capable of replication, could
have also occurred on Mars
18Viking 1 and 2 - Background
- further, if replicating systems did appear on
Mars in an earlier, more benign environment than
exists today, the question is whether these
ancient organisms were able to adapt to worsening
conditions on that planet, as it lost its surface
water and much of its atmosphere, and cooled to
its present cold, arid, seemingly hostile
condition - the biological experiments aboard the Viking
spacecraft were intended to probe this possibility
19Viking Biology Experiments
- the two landers conducted four experiments
intended to detect the presence of
microbiological life on the Martian surface - soil samples were retrieved by the landers'
extendible arms
20Viking 1 2 The Four Experiments
- The Gas Exchange Experiment (GEX)
- The Labeled Release Experiment (LR)
- The Pyrolytic Release Experiment (PR)
- The Gas Chromtaograph - Mass Spectrometry
Experiment (GCMS)
211. The Gas Exchange Experiment (GEX)
- measured the production and/or uptake of CO2, N2,
CH4, H2 and O2 during incubation of a soil sample - a sample of Martian soil was deposited into a
reaction chamber - a solution of organic nutrients in H2O was added
- microorganisms were supposed to grow and produce
the gases proving metabolism and thus the
existence of life
221. GEX - Results
- large quantities of O2 were released that were
attributed to oxygen-producing chemical reactions
caused by the addition of water
232. The Labeled Release Experiment (LR)
- Labeled Release detect metabolic processes
through radiorespirometry - a radioactive nutrition solution containing 14C
was added to a soil sample - after metabolizing the nutrients, living
organisms would release radioactively-tagged
gases such as CO2 and CH4, which would be
detected by radiation detectors
242. LR - Results
- after first wetting, a sudden rise in the
radioactivity level of the gases was found - but after a second wetting, which should have
been equally nourishing for the organisms in the
soil, the radioactivity level did not only fail
to rise, but actually decreased - the explanation was that the nutrition solution
reacted with oxygen-rich compounds in the soil,
but after the first wetting, the compounds were
used up
253. The Pyrolytic Release Experiment (PR)
- Pyrolytic Release (carbon assimilation) to
detect the photosynthetic or chemical fixation of
CO2 or CO containing 14C - a soil sample was placed in a reaction chamber
containing an atmosphere identical to Mars,
except that the gases CO and CO2 were replaced by
radioactive counterparts containing 14C
263. PR - Results
- radioactive 14C was taken up by the soil sample,
and after incineration could be detected as
planned - a second experiment then heated the soil sample
for a long time at 175oC, whereby all forms of
life must have been destroyed, then the
experiment was repeated by adding radioactive
gases - this procedure gave the same results, indicating
that biology had nothing to do with the
translocation of 14C from CO and CO2 to other
compounds
274. The Gas Chromatograph - Mass Spectrometry
Experiment (GCMS)
- the GCMS also heated a soil sample and revealed
an unexpected amount of water but failed to
detect organic compounds - this absence was so absolute that it seemed there
must be some mechanism actually destroying carbon
compounds on the surface
28Viking Biology Experiments
- NASA conclusion "Viking not only found no life
on Mars, it showed why there is no life there....
the extreme dryness, the pervasive
short-wavelength ultraviolet radiation... Viking
found that Mars is even dryer than had previously
been thought... The dryness alone would suffice
to guarantee a lifeless Mars combined with the
planet's radiation flux, Mars becomes almost
moon-like in its hostility to life." - Gilbert Levin, who was the principal investigator
for the Labeled Release (LR) experiment,
maintains that "...it is now more than probable
than not that the LR experiment did in fact
detect life on Mars."
29Viking Biology Experiments
- a consideration is that all the Viking
experiments used samples from the uppermost
Martian surface - but current thinking, from the
new facts of life in extreme environments on
Earth, is that it is more likely that life would
be extant in the deeper subsurface. organisms
that had migrated or been carried to deeper
levels would enjoy a measure of protection not
experienced by surface dwellers..."
30Viking Non-Biological Experiments
- several other instruments aboard the Viking
landers ultimately made substantial contributions
to our understanding of the status of extant
biology on Mars - these included
- an extremely sensitive gas chromatograph-mass
- spectrometer for elucidating the nature of
organic compounds that might be present in
martian surface material, and also for
determining the composition of the Martian
atmosphere - an X-ray fluorescence instrument for analyzing
the elemental composition of surface samples - 3. an imaging system capable of surveying the
local surroundings in black and white and color,
over the course of the seasons
31Viking Non-Biological Experiments
- Major findings of interest were
- that no organic compounds were detected in
surface samples - that the inorganic elemental composition of
surface samples were consistent with a mixture of
iron-rich (smectite) clays, magnesium sulfate,
and iron oxides - that, in addition to carbon dioxide and carbon
monoxide, the surface atmosphere contained about
2.5 nitrogen and 0.15 oxygen - that no structures uniquely attributable to
biological entities were present in more than
4500 images obtained from the two landers
32Viking Experiments
- Qualifications
- the general acceptance of the lack of biological
activity on Mars is based on the failure of the
Viking organic analysis instrument (GCMS for
gas chromatograph mass-spectrometer) to find any
organic compounds, even though the LR returned a
positive result, no structures uniquely
attributable to biological entities were present
in more than 4500 images obtained from the two
landers, and the presumed absence of liquid water
on the surface of the planet
33Martian Meteorites
- Martian meteorites are not the ideal samples
within which to look for signs of life as they
represent relatively fresh samples of igneous
rocks, produced by volcanic activity either at
high or low levels within the martian crust - hence from only their primary features, it is
apparent that they should not record any evidence
of life - in the case of Martian rocks, it is the
subsequent histories of the samples that are
investigated - secondary events such as
weathering, hydrothermal activity and atmospheric
exposure - in other words, processes that occurred after the
rocks crystallized and cooled down
34Martian Meteorites
- preservation and recovery of meteorites in the
Antarctic ice fields
- meteorites are easier to find in Antarctica than
elsewhere on Earth as it is easy to see black
meteorites on the white ice. Also, meteorites
that fall onto the Antarctic ice are frozen and
preserved much better than they would be anywhere
else on Earth
35Martian Meteorites
- 19 Martian-meteorites (igneous rocks) have been
found - previously classified as Shergotty, Nakhla and
Chassigny (SNC) meteorites in the 1960s - petrographic features differ from other
meteorites leading scientists to believe that the
SNC group are derived from planets, not asteroids - ages mostly 150-1300 Ma, corresponding to
probable periods of volcanic activity on the
Martian surface, except ALH84001 which is 4.5 Ga - e.g., the 14N/15N ratios from trapped gasses in
the SNCs are exactly equivalent to the 14N/15N
ratios measured by the Viking landers
36The Martian atmosphere was measured, on Mars, by
the Viking lander spacecraft in 1976. The gas in
Martian meteorites are measured in laboratories
on Earth. If the two gas samples were identical,
points on the graph would fall on the straight
line from lower left to upper right. As you
can see, the gas from the Martian meteorite
EETA79001 is identical to the Martian atmosphere.
37Martian Meteorites
Element ratios allow the identification of Mars
meteorites plots of different element ratios
occupy different regions in the diagrams. This
is likely due to variations of the element
abundances with distance from the Sun during
accretion.
38Oxygen Isotope Composition of Martian Meteorites
39Martian Meteorite ALH84001
ALH84001 with intact fusion crust
40History of Martian Meteorite ALH84001
- ALH84001, an igneous rock (magmatic),
crystallized 4.5 Ga - 4.0 and 3.8 Ga, shock and fractures from a nearby
impact event produced the many fissures now seen
filled with other material
41History of Martian Meteorite ALH84001
- between 4.0 and 3.6 Ga, when Mars was likely
warmer and wetter, water penetrated fractures in
the subsurface rock - 3.5 to 1.39 Ga, carbonates crystallized from
fluid
- living organisms also may have assisted in the
formation of the carbonate and were fossilized
42Birthplace of Martian Meteorite ALH84001
- data from the Mars Global Surveyor and Mars
Odyssey orbiters suggests matches between the
ALH84001s mineral content and the composition of
the Eos Chasma branch of the Valles Marineris
canyon system
43History of Martian Meteorite ALH84001
- 12 - 17 Ma, after one or more nearby impacts
after the deposition of carbonates, ALH 84001 was
launched into interplanetary space by a large
nearby meteor impact on Mars - this is the only type of natural event that could
eject a rock from Mars' gravitational field with
the necessary escape velocity of 5.4 km/sec - after 15 Ma, a small body struck Mars, ejecting
a piece of the rock - for millions of years, the
rock floated through space, falling in Antarctica
13 Ka as a meteorite
44Event Ages of Martian Meteorite ALH84001
- Phase I primary crystallization age 4.5 Ga a.
based on 238U and 235U in relation to Pb - Phase II shock at 4.0 Ga a. based on 40Ar/40K
clock reset b. possible multiple shock events
before ejection c. volcanic event,
probably brought cumulate to surface - Phase III shock at 15 Ma a. possible ejection
event b. based on exposure to mineralogical
changes due to exposure to cosmic
ray bombardment
45Cosmic Ray Exposure Age of ALH84001
- cosmic ray exposure age is how long a meteorite
orbited in interplanetary space, exposed to
cosmic rays from the Sun and the galaxy - as these cosmic rays (high-energy elementary
particles) hit a meteorite, they produce some
characteristic new isotopes (by transmutation) of
chemical elements, both radioactive and stable - the longer a meteorite is exposed to cosmic rays,
the more of these new isotopes are present
46Cosmic Ray Exposure Age of ALH84001
- for ALH 84001, isotopes of the elements 3He,
21Ne, and 38Ar have been used to calculate a
cosmic ray exposure age - most of these ages are between 16 and 17 million
years, with a few measurements as young as 12
million years
47Terrestrial Age of ALH84001
- streaking through Earth's 300-km thick atmosphere
at a minimum speed of 15 km/sec, ALH 84001 melted
partially on the surface, forming the glassy
black fusion crust, which later quickly
identified it as a meteorite
48Terrestrial Age of ALH84001
- the terrestrial age of a meteorite is how long
ago the meteorite fell to Earth - radioactive isotopes are formed in a meteorite,
in space, as it is bombarded by cosmic rays - after its fall, it was protected from further
cosmic ray bombardment by Earths shielding
magnetic field, it is no longer hit by cosmic
rays, no more of the radioactive isotopes form,
and the ones already in the rock continue to
decay - the more of these isotopes in a meteorite, the
less time it has spent on Earth
49Terrestrial Age of ALH84001
- terrestrial ages are usually determined from
isotopes of the elements C (14C), Be (10Be), and
Cl (36Cl) - the best measure of ALH84001s terrestrial age
comes from its abundance of 14C - the abundance of 14C in ALH 84001 gives a
terrestrial age of about 13,000 years
50Terrestrial Age of ALH84001
- 13,000 to less than 20 years ago - glacial
transport
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)