Local Authorities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Local Authorities

Description:

'We want every 16 and 17 year-old to participate. in education or training. ... Wales Webb Review - integrated 14-19 funding system - 16-19 apprenticeships included ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: kcr79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Local Authorities


1
EDEXCEL
  • Local Authorities
  • and
  • 14-19 Funding from 2011/12
  • Mark Corney
  • MC Consultancy


2
APPROACH
  • APPROACH 1
  • A Z
  • APPROACH 2
  • A Z


3
APPROACH 2
  • A Z
  • We want every 16 and 17 year-old to participate
  • in education or training.
  • (Raising Expectations enabling the system to
    deliver. Line 1. Para 1.1)


4
LEARNING LEAVING AGE
  • raise to 17 in 2013 (end of academic year)
  • raise to 18 in 2014 (18th birthday)
  • Level 3 or 18th birthday whichever is the sooner
  • participate in learning at least a unit of a

  • qualification
  • statutory right to day/block release

5
RAISING THE LEARNING LEAVING AGE TO 17 IN 2013
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





6
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





7
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





8
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12 14-19
    Funding System?




9
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
    Creation of YPLA

  • Transfer of 16-18
    LSC Funding

  • to Local
    Authorities
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12


10
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
    Local Authorities Funders

  • and Strategic
    Commissioners

  • of 3-15 and 16-18
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12


11
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10
    Shadow Structures in Place
  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





12
ASSESSMENT



  • CHANGES TO 16-18 FUNDING
  • MUST NOT CUT ACROSS
  • 14-19 FUNDING SYSTEM




13
THE GREAT FUNDING TRANSFER AND 14-19 FUNDING


14bn
14
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • 16-18 Apprenticeships and Local Authorities in
    2011/12
  • - demonstrate good links with NAS
  • - local engagement with employers
  • - local labour market intelligence
  • possible transfer of funding?


15
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Academy Funding and 2011/12 14-19 Funding
  • - academy numbers might grow (400 by 2010)
  • - DCSF to YPLA to Academies?
  • - transform into school trusts and become
  • funded by DCSF to YPLA to LAs?


16
AN INTEGRATED 14-19 FUNDING SYSTEM
  • Wales Webb Review
  • - integrated 14-19 funding system
  • - 16-19 apprenticeships included
  • - no academies in Wales
  • - Local Authorities small in Wales
  • - all 14-15 funding either to (i) 14-19
    consortia

  • (ii) up to WAG


17
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12 14-19
    Credit Qualifications

  • System?




18
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09 Key
    Stage 3
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





19
ASSESSMENT



  • 14-19 CREDIT BASED QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM
  • AND
  • 14-19 FUNDING SYSTEM?




20
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • SEPTEMBER 2013 TO 17
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09 Key
    Stage 3
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11

  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12
    Subject Diplomas

21
AN INTEGRATED 14-19 FUNDING SYSTEM
  • Wales Webb Review
  • - integrated 14-19 funding system
  • - 16-19 apprenticeships included
  • - no academies in Wales
  • - Local Authorities small in Wales
  • - all 14-15 funding either to (i) 14-19
    consortia

  • (ii) up to WAG


22
APPROACH
  • OPTION 1
  • A Z
  • OPTION 2
  • Z
    A


23
APPROACH 1
  • A Z


24
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10
    Shadow Structures in Place
  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12





25
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
    Creation of YPLA

  • Transfer of 16-18
    LSC Funding

  • to Local
    Authorities
  • Sept 2011 YR10 14/15 2011/12


26
THE FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Learning Year Age
    Year
  • Sept 2007 YR6 10/11 2007/08

  • Sept 2008 YR7 11/12 2008/09
  • Sept 2009 YR8 12/13 2009/10

  • Sept 2010 YR9 13/14 2010/11
    Local Authorities 3-15 Schools

  • 16-18 LSC Sixth Form
    2.1bn

  • 16-18 LSC FE
    3.6bn

  • 16-18 E2E
    0.2bn

  • 16-25 LDD
    0.3bn

  • NAS 16-18 Apprenticeship
    0.8bn

  • DCSF 16-18 Academies
    0.2bn


27
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • administration
  • commissioning
  • planning to inform funding
  • funding


28
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 1 Local Leadership Accountability
  • Para 1.7
  • local leadership and single point of
    accountability for 14-19 phase
  • Local Authorities to provide this leadership

29
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 2 Ring-Fenced 16-18 Education
  • Budget
  • 3-15 Dedicated Schools Grant
  • 16-18 Dedicated Education Grant (?)

30
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 3 Funding devolved to each Local
  • Authority
  • 150 LAs but more as more unitary authorities are
    created
  • funding devolved to each Local Authority
  • unless groups of Local Authorities decide
  • to pool funding
  • - difference between 16-18 and 14-19

31
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 4 Funding Following the Learner
  • Para 4.4
  • mainly 16-18 FE
  • what about 14-15 FE?
  • Principle 5 Funding Model ensuring Funding
  • Reaches Providers Appropriately
  • Para 1.10
  • mainly 16-18 FE
  • what about 14-15 FE?

32
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 6 Funding by Participation and
  • National Rates
  • Current Position
  • Residency/Participation Local/National
    Rates
  • 3-15 Participation
    Local Rates
  • 16-18 Participation
    National Rates

33
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 6 Funding by Participation and
  • National Rates
  • Possible Future Position
  • Residency/Participation Local/National
    Rates
  • 3-13 Participation
    Local Rates
  • 14-15 Participation
    National Rates
  • 16-18 Participation
    National Rates

34
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 6 Funding by Participation and
  • National Rates
  • Prior to the Consultation Paper
  • - some providers enrol learners from many LAs
  • - FE colleges but recognition of specialist
    providers
  • - 16-18 but recognition of14-15 (rate for the
    job)
  • reduce need for re-coupement given cross
  • boundary traffic
  • participation/national rates should facilitate
    not prevent learning outside LA area including
    14-15

35
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 6 Funding by Participation and
  • National Rates
  • Consultation Paper
  • there should be no assumption that it is
    problematic that a young person chooses to leave
    the area of one local authority to learn
    elsewhere
  • travel to learn patterns
  • greater focus on 16-18 relative to 14-15

36
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 7 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates

37
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 7 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates

38
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 7 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates

39
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 7 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates
  • The commissioning process of course
  • drives funding. (Para 5.1)
  • (but will commissioning reflect individual choice
    or aggregate demand of economic
  • Needs of LAs and RDAs)

40
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 8 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates via Sub-
  • Regional LA Groupings
  • one fifth of the 11-16 cohort changes per
  • year
  • 16-18 participation is more volatile with 10
    change in a year
  • funding model that is responsive to demand
  • (funding model that is responsive under LLA)

41
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 8 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates via Sub-
  • Regional LA Groupings
  • - LAs can act as single commissioner large
  • shire local authorities without unitary
    authorities
  • - expectation of formal sub-regional LA
  • groupings
  • - formal sub-regional LA groupings across 9
    English regions
  • - whole regions might form formal LA grouping
    (not same as funding to the regional tier)

42
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 8 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates via Sub-
  • Regional LA Groupings
  • whole regions might form formal LA grouping
  • LAs come together in 9 informal Government
    Office regions
  • not the same as regions/RDAs as budget holder

43
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 8 Commissioning by Participation
  • and National Rates via Sub-
  • Regional LA Groupings

44
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
  • administration
  • commissioning
  • planning to inform funding
  • funding


45
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 9 Oversight by National YPLA and
  • Regional YPLA of funding and
  • commissioning by participation
  • and national rates by formal
    LA
  • groupings
  • - National YPLA
  • - Regional YPLA
  • Sub-Regional LA Groupings

46
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 9 Oversight by National YPLA and
  • Regional YPLA of funding and
  • commissioning by participation
  • and national rates by formal
    LA
  • groupings
  • Option 1 DCSF to Local Authorities
  • Option 2 DCSF to YPLA to Local Authorities
  • Option 3 DCSF to YPLA to Local Authorities
    mediated
  • (i) sub-regional LA groupings
  • (ii) Regional YPLA

47
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 9 Oversight by National YPLA and
  • Regional YPLA of funding and
  • commissioning by participation
  • and national rates by formal
    LA
  • groupings
  • Option 1 DCSF to Local Authorities (Para 3.5)
  • break the bank - LAs commission
    what they want at a national rate
    funded by government
  • lack of budgetary control
  • in practice fund on last years
    budget
  • limited scope for commissioning

48
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 9 Oversight by National YPLA and
  • Regional YPLA of funding and
  • commissioning by participation
  • and national rates by formal
    LA
  • groupings
  • Option 2 DCSF to YPLA to Local Authorities
  • hands-on national agency role
  • Local Authorities assess needs,
    proposals to fill gaps
  • YPLA would retain responsibility
    for commissioning,
  • fund FE colleges, have budgetary
    control
  • Local Authorities not be able to provide
    real leadership
  • with commissioning to fit the
    budget

49
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 9 Oversight by National YPLA and
  • Regional YPLA of funding and
  • commissioning by participation
  • and national rates by formal
    LA
  • groupings
  • Option 3 DCSF to YPLA to Local Authorities
    mediated
  • (i) sub-regional LA groupings
  • (ii) Regional YPLA
  • - Funding can be plan-led not lagged
  • - RDA to co-chair regional YPLA (Para 3.23)

50
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 10YPLA to secure budgetary
  • control will give more
    space for
  • LAs to undertake commissioning
  • YPLA (Para 3.22)
  • step in if LAs unable top reach collective plan
  • establish and agree national planning and
    commissioning framework
  • work with JACQA on qualifications to be funded
  • manage national and regional contracts for some
  • provision (youth justice and vol org
    provision)

51
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 10YPLA to secure budgetary
  • control will give more
    space for
  • LAs to undertake commissioning
  • Regional YPLA (Para 3.23)
  • Local Authorities/RDAs/NAS/DIUS
  • RDA regional demand
  • Co-chaired by RDA
  • Indicative regional budget
  • Full range of Diplomas and 16-18 Apprenticeships
  • Local Authorities might resist this

52
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Principle 11 comparable funding for
  • comparable provision
  • Para 5.3
  • Principle 12 16-18 funding methodology will
  • remain
  • Para 5.6 GLHs to each Qual

53
16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • VARYING DEGREES OF COLLABORATION
  • Model (a) FE commissioning by YPLA at regional
  • level
  • Model (b) Home Local Authority manages the
  • relationship with school sixth forms
  • sixth form colleges and sub-regional

54
HE WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE
  • administration
  • commissioning
  • planning to inform funding
  • funding


55
LAs AND 16-18 FUNDING TRANSFER
  • Under the learning leaving age, Local Authorities
  • to commission to maximise access rather than
  • maximise provision in their local area (Para
    4.10)
  • Local authorities have powers to re-organise
    16-18
  • provision (Para 4.15)
  • Local authorities accountable via National
    Indicator
  • Set (include NEET category and L2/L3 attainment)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com