CommonKADS Context Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

CommonKADS Context Models

Description:

social uproar = headlines in the papers. Solution (a priori formulated by SSS management) ... TM-1: Top-level task model. Fill in TM components (see TM Figure) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: Schre9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CommonKADS Context Models


1
CommonKADS Context Models
  • Organization Model
  • Task Model
  • Agent Model

2
Knowledge always functions within an
organizational context
  • Why context modelling?
  • Role of aspect models organization, task, and
    agent models
  • Steps and techniques in knowledge-oriented
    business analysis
  • Illustrations ice-cream case study, housing case
    study

3
Why context modeling?
  • Often difficult to identify profitable use of
    (knowledge) technology
  • Laboratory is different from the ''real'' world
  • Acceptability to users very important
  • Fielding into ongoing process not self evident
  • Often not clear what additional measures to take

4
Goals for context modeling
  • Identify problems and opportunities
  • Decide about solutions and their feasibility
  • Improve tasks and task-related knowledge
  • Plan for needed organizational changes

5
Role of knowledge systems
  • "automation" is not the right way to look at KSs
  • tasks are usually too complex
  • much better view KS as process-improvement tool
  • typical role of KS active intelligent assistant

6
Context modelling process
  • Step 1 Carry out a scoping and feasibility study
  • Tool Organization Model (OM)
  • Step 2 Carry out impact and improvement study
  • Tool Task and Agent Models (TM, AM)
  • zooming in/refinement of organization model
  • Each study consists of an analysis part and a
    constructive decision-making part

7
Step 1 scoping and feasibility study
  • Step 1a analysis
  • Identify problem/opportunity areas and potential
    solutions
  • Put them into a wider organizational perspective.
  • Step 1b synthesis
  • Decide about economic, technical and project
    feasibility
  • Select the most promising focus area and target
    solution.

8
Step 2 impacts and improvements study
  • Step 2a analysis
  • study interrelationships between the task, agents
    involved, and use of knowledge for successful
    performance
  • what improvements may be achieved here?
  • Step 2b synthesis
  • Decide about organizational measures and task
    changes,
  • Ensure organizational acceptance and integration
    of a knowledge system solution

9
Three context models
  • scope and feasibility study
  • organization model (OM)
  • description and analysis of the broader
    organizational environment
  • impacts and improvements study
  • task model (TM) and agent model (AM)
  • more focused and detailed
  • zooms in on the relevant part of the organization
  • TM tasks plus knowledge directly related to the
    target problem
  • AM agents involved in TM tasks

10
Worksheets
  • Modeling process supported by worksheets
  • Organization model 5 worksheets
  • Task model 2 worksheets
  • Agent model 1 worksheet
  • Summary 1 worksheet
  • Act as checklist and information archive
  • Should be used flexibly

11
How to analyze a knowledge-intensive organization?
  • describe organization aspects
  • opportunity/problems portfolio
  • business context, goals, strategy
  • internal organization
  • structure
  • processes
  • people (staff functional roles)
  • power and culture
  • resources (knowledge, support systems,
    equipment,)
  • do this for both current and future organization
  • comparison, and first decisions on where to go

12
Worksheets Organization Model
13
OM-1 problem /opportunity identification
  • shortlist of perceived problems/opportunities
  • organizational context invariant part
  • mission, vision, goals of the organization
  • important external factors
  • strategy of the organization, value chain
  • list possible solutions
  • for the perceived problems and opportunities
  • compatible with organizational context.
  • techniques interviews, brainstorming

14
Case Study Ice-cream product development
  • Unilever food/personal care industry worldwide
  • First analysis step by worksheet OM-1
  • Perceived problem/opportunity issues
  • Speed-up time to market of new ice-cream products
  • Leverage best-practice knowledge throughout the
    company
  • Vision

15
OM-1 for Housing
Organization Model Problems and Opportunities Worksheet OM-1
Problems and opportunities assessment takes too much time not sufficient time for urgent cases
Organizational context Mission transparency of procedure, clear applicant responsibility External actors local council, public opinion, national regulations, Strategy broaden scope of market
Solutions Automated assessment system Training program for assessors to be come urgency handlers
16
Case Housing
  • Local government institution is responsible for
    assignment of rental houses to applicants
  • Transparent assignment procedure
  • two-weekly magazine with house offers
  • publication of results
  • Partially automated process
  • Existing databases of applicants and residences

17
Problem opportunity
  • Two sides of the same coin
  • Opportunity
  • a part of the business process in which it might
    be useful to introduce knowledge technology
  • Problem
  • an opportunity, that is currently being perceived
    as a problem in the organization

18
Organization boundary
  • Sometimes difficult to define the scope of what
    is the organization
  • Example in the housing domain
  • baseline organization assignment office
  • includes applicants?
  • includes rental agencies?
  • Decide on variant and invariant parts
  • invariant parts are assumed to be stable from the
    development point of view

19
OM-2 variant aspects
  • refers to a single problem-opportunity area of
    OM-1
  • describes the subpart of the organization
    involved
  • describes the aspects that might change or be
    affected by a knowledge-system solution

20
Variant aspects OM-2 (1)
  • structure
  • structure chart of departments, groups, units
  • process
  • decomposed into tasks plus dependencies
  • detailed in Worksheet OM-3
  • people
  • staff members involved as actors or stakeholders
  • decision makers, providers, users, customers
  • not "actual" people but functional roles

21
Variant aspects OM-2 (2)
  • resources
  • information systems
  • equipment and materials
  • non-knowledge skills and competencies.
  • knowledge
  • special resource in this context
  • detailed in Worksheet OM-4
  • culture and power
  • "unwritten rules of the game, styles of working
    and communicating, informal relationships

22
OM-2 ice-cream organization analysis
  • Example part of OM-2 analysis
  • Structure

23
Structure people Housing
24
Process Housing
25
Remainder of OM-2 for Housing
Organization model Variant aspects Worksheet OM-2
Resources Existing database of applicants and residences Priority calculator for computing a priority list of applicants for a residence.
Knowledge Assessment criteria knowledge for judging correctness of individual applications Assignment rules knowledge used for selecting an applicant for a particular house. Urgency rules special rules and regulations for urgent cases (e.g., handicapped people).
Culture power Hierarchical organization Employees view the future with some trepidation Management style history as civil servant
26
OM-3 Process Breakdown
  • Key element gt described in more detail
  • Fill-in for each task in the Process description
  • OM-3 elements
  • Task name identifier
  • Performed by agent (People or Resource)
  • Where? location in Structure
  • Knowledge required list of Knowledge assets
  • Knowledge-intensive? yes/no
  • Significance qualitative value, e.g. five-point
    scale

27
OM-3 example breakdown of ice-cream process
  • In ice-cream product development the main
    subprocesses are
  • product idea generation
  • feasibility phase
  • production and sales planning
  • implementation and role-out
  • post-launch review
  • All subprocesses are knowledge-intensive, but
    feasibility and planning phases in particular

28
Example OM-3 for Housing
Task Performed by Where Knowledge asset(s) KI? Signifi- cance
1. Magazine production Magazine editor Public service - No 3
2. Data entry applications Data typist / automated telephone Residence assignment - No 2
3. Application assessment Assigner Residence assignment Assessment criteria Yes 5
4. Residence assignment Assigner Residence Assignment Assignment urgency rules Yes 5
29
OM-4 Knowledge Assets
  • details the "Knowledge" element of OM-2
  • coarse-grained description
  • refined in task model and knowledge model
  • elements
  • Knowledge Asset Name (OM-3)
  • Possessed by Agent (OM-3)
  • Used in Task ID (OM-3)
  • Right Form? Right Place? Right Time? Right
    Quality?
  • yes/no comments

30
OM-4 knowledge assets for ice-cream business
process
31
Knowledge asset Housing
  • Knowledge asset
  • general residence-application norms
  • right form?
  • no, should be also in electronic form
  • right place, time, quality?
  • yes

32
Feasibility document contents
  • One copy of Worksheet OM-1
  • For each problem/opportunity area OM-2
  • For each task OM-3
  • For each knowledge asset OM-4
  • For each suggested solution decision to
    "automate" yes/no plus reasons
  • Worksheet OM-5 checklist for this decision
  • Proposed actions

33
Business Feasibility
  • expected benefits
  • tangible (economic) and intangible
  • expected added value
  • expected costs
  • comparison to possible alternative solutions
  • organizational changes required
  • economic and business risks and uncertainties

34
Technical Feasibility
  • complexity of knowledge/reasoning process
  • availability of state-of-the-art methods
  • has it been done before?
  • critical aspects involved?
  • time, quality, needed resources
  • measurable success factors
  • tests for validity, quality and performance
  • complexity of user/system interaction
  • availability of state-of-the-art methods

35
Project Feasibility
  • commitment from the agents and stakeholders
  • availability of resources in terms of time,
    budget, equipment, staff
  • availablity of required knowledge and other
    competencies
  • realistic expectations
  • adequate project organization and external
    communication

36
Proposed Actions
  • recommended concrete steps for action
  • List of focus areas
  • Target solution for focus area
  • Expected results and benefits
  • Required project actions
  • When to reconsider?

37
OM-5 feasibility decision document for
ice-cream example
  • Business, technical and project feasibility
  • Proposed actions for solution direction
  • Ice-cream case study
  • Clarification of knowledge bottlenecks achieved
  • Different knowledge improvement scenarios
    outlined
  • Requirements for technical and project
    feasibility stated
  • Proposed actions
  • Prioritize knowledge improvement scenarios as
    next step
  • .

38
Feasibility Housing
  • Automation of application assignment
  • feasible from all perspectives
  • Actions
  • application construction
  • job changes within assignment department
  • provide additional training
  • consider also resource transfer to computer dept.

39
Case social security services (SSS)
  • Problem-opportunity-context see book
  • Problem
  • laws and regulations are so complex
  • gt long time to reach a decision gt backlog
  • gt social uproar gt headlines in the papers
  • Solution (a priori formulated by SSS management)
  • knowledge system stores the legal decision-making
    knowledge
  • gt backlog reduced

40
SSS scope and feasibility decision making
  • Context analysis see book
  • Solution "KS for solving backlog problem"
  • Business feasibility
  • does not solve the problem as main task load is
    in archiving
  • requires organizational changes
  • status of people will change
  • Technical/project feasibility
  • state-of-the-art work
  • Proposed actions
  • redirect the project to simplify procedures for
    archiving and reporting.

41
Next step of context modelling zooming in on
tasks
  • Task subpart of a business process
  • goal-oriented value-adding activity
  • handles inputs and delivers desired outputs
  • in a structured and controlled way
  • consumes resources
  • requires (and provides) knowledge/skills
  • adheres to quality and performance criteria
  • carried out by responsible and accountable agents

42
Task Model aspects
43
TM-1 Task Analysis
  • zoom in on a task
  • more detailed description than OM-3
  • link to BPR/BPA methods
  • task is part of business process
  • link to SE analysis model
  • dependency and flow
  • data, function, control view on task

44
Task description internal
  • data dependency and data flow
  • preceding task, follow-up tasks
  • objects handled
  • simple information model
  • timing control
  • frequency, duration, when performed
  • constraints pre- and post-conditions

45
TM-1 Top-level task model
  • Fill in TM components (see TM Figure)
  • Example task decomposition and flow of
    feasibility phase
  • Gives first-cut version for task layer of
    knowledge model

46
Data flow Housing
47
Control flow Housing
48
Task description external
  • goal and value
  • agents involved
  • knowledge
  • list of knowledge items further detailed in TM-2
  • other competencies and skills
  • resources
  • refinement of OM-2
  • quality and performance
  • yardsticks for measuring task execution

49
TM-2 knowledge item description
  • Possessed by Agent
  • Used inTask ID
  • Domain
  • specialist field, discipline, branch of science
    or engineering, professional community
  • Indicate nature, form and availability of
    knowledge
  • tick if bottleneck

50
Characterizations of knowledge items
  • Nature
  • formal, rigorous empirical, quantitative
    heuristic, rules of thumb, .....
  • Form
  • mind, paper, electronic, action skill, ...
  • Availability
  • limitations in time, space, access, quality, form

51
TM-2 Detailing of knowledge items bottlenecks
  • Ice-cream case
  • Knowledge item consumer desires
  • Bottlenecks exist in
  • Nature incomplete, tacit, hard to verify
  • Form in mind of marketers only
  • Availability limitations in space and quality

52
Agent Model
  • OM and TM gt process/task perspective
  • AM perspective of individual agents
  • staff, software systems
  • large part rearrangement of information already
    in other worksheets
  • just a single worksheet
  • agent view useful for judging impact
  • See attitude matrix
  • important input for communication model

53
Agent Worksheet AM-1the assigner agent
Name Assigner
Organization Residence-assignment department
Involved In 3. Application assessment 4. Residence assignment
Communicates with Database Priority calculator
Knowledge Assessment criteria Assignment rules Urgency rules
Other competencies Ability to handle problematic non-standard cases
Responsibilities constraints Make sure that people are treated equally (no favors). This has been a problem in the past
54
Final step impacts and and improvements document
  • checklist in Worksheet OTA-1
  • measures for improvement accompany development
    work
  • major issues for decision making
  • organizational changes recommended
  • measures for specific tasks and/or workers
  • improvements regarding use and availability of
    knowledge
  • is the expected result sufficient?
  • future directions

55
Impacts and Changes (1)Organization as a whole
  • Structure
  • Process
  • Resources
  • People
  • Knowledge
  • Culture and Power

56
Impacts and Changes (2)Task/Agent-Specific
  • comparison future/current models
  • impact and change types
  • task lay-out
  • needed resources
  • performance and quality criteria
  • staffing, involved agents
  • individual positions, responsibilities,
    authority, constraints in task execution
  • knowledge and competencies
  • communication

57
Proposed Actions
  • improvements/changes in organization
  • accompanying measures
  • training, facilities
  • further project action
  • when to reconsider

58
OTA-1 impacts and improvements decisions
  • Ice-cream case processing scenario ranks best
  • Proposed actions
  • Develop processing KBS module
  • Archive past formulations
  • Structured knowledge management for knowledge
    sharing

59
Stakeholder-driven approach in Unilever PARIS
ice-cream project
60
Actors and stakeholders attitudes and
commitments
  • Important guideline always consider attitudes of
    actors and stakeholders toward changes
  • Ask yourself is there a sufficient basis to
    successfully carry through proposed changes?
  • Technique stakeholder attitude matrix
  • (EMS case, IEEE Intell. Syst. 1997)

Stakeholder/Solution SQ I II III IV V VI
Hospital specialist -
General Practitioner o o - - - -
EMS personnel o - -
Consumer - o (SQ
status quo)
61
Attitude matrix internal
  • Sponsor/Solutions SQ I II III IV V VI
  • Manager - - o - -
  • System manager - o o o o o
  • Dispatcher - - o - -
  • Paramedic - o -
  • Driver - o o o o
  • Consumer -

62
Summary
  • Organizational aspects critical success factor
  • Envisaged systems must be well-integrated
  • Step 1 portfolio of solutions feasibility
  • organization model
  • feasibility document
  • Step 2 zoom in and assess changes/measures
  • task, knowledge item, and agent descriptions
  • plan for organizational changes
  • Context analysis is wider applicable

63
Overall process of business analysis in KEM
64
Exercise knowledge workshop
  • Management group discussions, structured by using
    worksheets OM1-5, TM1-2, OTA-1, as a
    self-assessment instrument for management in own
    area of responsibility
  • Used by, e.g., Unilever and Dutch Tax Authority
  • In particular
  • Focus on valuable business area or process,
    sketch the workflow of this process, and list
    problem/opportunity portfolio
  • Identify the knowledge assets of importance to
    this process
  • Investigate whether there exists bottlenecks here
    (OM-4, TM-2)
  • Devise possible solutions and analyze their
    feasibility
  • Problem/cause/solution QFD-type matrices
  • Stakeholder attitude matrices
  • Take follow-up managerial action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com