20092010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions

1
2009-2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
2

• This list represents POTENTIAL reductions for the
  2009-2010 school year.
• No action will be taken until May or June
  following the Regular Legislative Session.

3
Criteria for Reductions

• The primary objectives
• to insure minimal impact on students
• to maintain adequate staffing
• Areas reviewed for reduction in the following
  priority order
• School Support Activities (District Level)
• Non-Instructional Activities (School Level)
• Instructional Activities (School Level)
• If necessary to eliminate positions permanently
  or through attrition, areas will be reviewed for
  reduction in the following priority order
• Non-Instructional Personnel
• Instructional Support Personnel
• Administrative / Supervisory Personnel
• Instructional Personnel

4
Assumptions

• For the 2009-10 revenue availability for our
  schools remains questionable.
• Based on State data, the projected decline for
  next year is an additional 9.2 or 1.6 billion.
• This means an additional 633 per student cut.
• For BPS, this equates to and additional cut of
  approximately 45 million.

5
Non-Recurring Budget Cuts for Both the Operating
and Capital Funds
6
Non-Recurring Budget Cuts for Both the Operating
and Capital Funds
7
Non-Recurring Budget Cuts for Both the Operating
and Capital Funds
8
Non-Recurring Budget Cuts for Both the Operating
and Capital Funds
9
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
10
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
11
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
12
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
13
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
14
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
15
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
16
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
17
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
18
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
19
2009 - 2010 POTENTIAL Budget Reductions
20
Timeline of Events
21

• This list represents POTENTIAL reductions for the
  2009-2010 school year.
• No action will be taken until May or June
  following the Regular Legislative Session.

22
(No Transcript)
23
School Board Contingency Spending vs. Budget
24
2001-02 to 2008-09

• The Operating Budget has increased 41 since
  2001-02, but if you exclude Class Size Reduction
  and K-12 Reading state categorical funds, the
  increase is only 21.
• This equates to a annual increase of 3 over the
  last 7 years.
• Beginning Teacher Salary has increased 27 over
  the same time period for an average annual
  increase of 3.9.

25
Floridas Ranking of Per Student Expenditure in
the Nation

• 2000-01 38th 7,718
• 2001-02 42nd 7,651
• 2002-03 43rd 7,759
• 2003-04 42nd 7,974
• 2004-05 42nd 8,232
• 17 below the nation average of 9,910

Source National Center for Education Statistics
26

• This list represents POTENTIAL reductions for the
  2009-2010 school year.
• No action will be taken until May or June
  following the Regular Legislative Session.

27
Summary

• Assumptions and Non-Recurring Reductions
• 66 million
• POTENTIAL Reductions
• 66.2 million
• Legislative session
• March 3 to May 1
• Board NOT involved until late May/June timeframe
• Parents, students, staff, community members,
  business partners
• Urged to do it NOW!
• Or these POTENTIAL cuts may become a REALITY!