ORDER IN THE COURT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

ORDER IN THE COURT

Description:

Did the principal violate the First Amendment rights of the journalists? ... The principal did not violate the freedom of the press in any way. Bibliography ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: cumbe
Category:
Tags: court | order | the | bc | cases | court | drama | principal | supreme | voice

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ORDER IN THE COURT


1
ORDER IN THE COURT!
  • Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeir

Kaitlyn B. and Kea S.
2
Introduction
  • High school students on the journalism staff at
    Hazelwood filed suit in Federal District Court
    because they felt their First Amendment rights
    were being taken away from them when the school
    officials would not publish their articles on
    pregnancy and divorce.

3
Case details
  • Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeir
  • No. 86-836
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • Argued October 13, 1987
  • Decided January 13, 1988

4
Who was involved in the case
  • Respondents Three former students At Hazelwood
    East High School.(Part of the Journalism I staff)
  • Principal Robert E. Reynolds

5
The First Amendment
  • Congress shall make no law respecting an
    establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
    free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom
    of speech, or of the press or the right of the
    people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
    Government for a redress of grievances.

6
Right or wrong?
  • Did the principal violate the First Amendment
    rights of the journalists?
  • No, the principals rejection of the articles did
    not violate their First amendment rights.
    Administrators have the right to check over
    students copy to make sure it is not offensive or
    libel in any way.

7
Conclusion
  • The Supreme Court was in favor with principal
    Reynolds, stating that the two articles were
    classified as inappropriate. The article on teen
    pregnancy invaded the privacy of students and the
    article on divorce was unfair because only the
    students views were being told when the parents
    should have been able to voice their opinions.
    The principal did not violate the freedom of the
    press in any way.

8
Bibliography
  • www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/hazelwo
    od.html
  • www.enotes.com/supreme-court-drama/hazelwood-schoo
    l-district-v-kuhlmeier
  • www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp.id4721
  • www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987_86_836
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com