Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections

Description:

Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections. Overview. What are ... boot camp. Types of IS. Intensive ... Boot camps. Used most commonly with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: janeas2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections


1
Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections
2
Overview
  • What are intermediate sanctions?
  • Why do we use them?
  • What are the specific forms of IS?
  • Who are the clients?

3
What are Intermediate Sanctions?
  • Range of sanctions between prison and traditional
    probation
  • Vary in intrusiveness and control
  • Most served in community
  • Some involve some form of detention

4
Why have intermed. sanctions?
  • 1) Democratic ideals
  • 2) Incarceration not effective at crime
    prevention
  • 3) More supervision than traditional probation
  • 4) More specialized programs
  • 5) Individualized punishment
  • 6) Alternative to prison for VOPs

5
Types of IS
  • Vary from state to state
  • Can operate at local or state level
  • Can be codified as law or instituted by
    correctional authority
  • Most common forms
  • intensive supervision probation (ISP)
  • work release
  • house arrest
  • electronic monitoring

6
Types of IS
  • Other forms
  • day fines
  • asset forfeiture
  • restitution
  • community service
  • day reporting centers
  • boot camp

7
Types of IS
  • Intensive supervision probation (ISP)
  • Very close supervision - for high-risk offenders
  • Find high rates technical violations
  • Rand experiment
  • Random assignment to ISP or probation
  • No difference in rearrest, but way more technical
    VOPs
  • Despite research findings, ISP extremely popular
    across country

8
Types of IS
  • House arrest (AKA home confinement)
  • Sentenced to incarceration, but serve sentence at
    home
  • Usually permitted to go out for specific reasons
    (e.g. work)
  • Most on house arrest genuinely diverted from
    prison
  • Seems to work best w/ low-risk offenders
  • Often used w/ electronic monitoring

9
Types of IS
  • Electronic monitoring
  • Most often used in conjunction w/ house arrest
  • Offender wears electronic transmitting device
  • Two types of monitors
  • Passive responds only to inquiries
  • Monitor calls offender, who has to put device on
    receiver next to phone
  • Active sends continuous signals to receiver
  • Monitor notes breaks in signal

10
Types of IS
  • Fines
  • Monetary penalty paid directly to court
  • Possible solution day fines
  • Tied to offenders ability to pay
  • First decide amount of fine in standardized
    units, based on severity of crime
  • e.g. How many days of freedom is it worth?
  • Then decide value of standardized unit
  • Usually offenders net daily income

11
Types of IS
  • Forfeiture
  • Government confiscates property obtained w/
    earned through criminal activity
  • Can be implemented under civil or criminal law
  • Civil can be seized w/o finding of guilt
  • Criminal occurs after conviction
  • Highly controversial, challenged in court
  • USSC has restricted its use

12
Types of IS
  • Restitution
  • Pay victim back for losses
  • Typically used as a probation add-on
  • Intended to help repair damage done
  • Frequently goes unpaid
  • National study found only 45 of total ordered
    was repaid

13
Types of IS
  • Community service
  • Offender provides free labor for specified hours
    in some public service
  • e.g, removing graffiti, cleaning parks
  • Benefits community and offender
  • Held accountable for his crime
  • Avoids economic penalty and incarceration
  • Some view it as too lenient

14
Types of IS
  • Boot camps
  • Used most commonly with juvenile offenders
  • Subject offender to harsh military discipline
  • Get him to shape up
  • Most evaluations?
  • No difference in recidivism between BC and
    traditional punishment

15
Who are the clients?
  • All types of offenders
  • Programs intended to target either offenders
  • whod otherwise go to prison or
  • who need more supervision than theyd get on
    probation
  • Reality many judges reluctant to divert
    offenders from prison
  • Result? Many sent to IS who actually would have
    been given probation ? no real cost saving

16
Who are the clients?
  • Programs themselves also take conservative
    approach
  • High-risk cases deemed ineligible
  • How choose?
  • Evaluate crime severity and offenders problems
  • Have to weigh stakes
  • What happens if offender fails?
  • Costs to victims and society
  • Also negative publicity for administering agency

17
Future of IS
  • Fed. govt. providing to states for IS
  • More than 1/2 the states have laws supporting
    comm. corrections
  • Provides to counties to keep people out of
    prison --gt WHY?
  • State pays for prison --gt counties have no
    incentive not to send them to prison
  • Still has had limited impact on prison pop.
  • Many states eliminated parole
  • Mandatory sentences --gt prison sentences

18
Future of IS
  • For IS to really make a dent, will have to
  • overcome reluctance on part of CJS to place
    offenders in
  • get communities to overcome their opposition to
    placing programs in their neighborhoods
  • have programs with clearly articulated goals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com