Pr

1
2006 QCD Moriond Discussion Meeting March 23,
2006
2
2006QCD Moriond Discussion Meeting The aim of
this meeting is to prepare future Moriond. In
1966, when I started the first Rencontres de
Moriond, the main objectives of the meeting are
A. Promote exchanges and collaboration between
experimentalists and theorists B. Promote young
physicists in giving them a priority for giving a
talk.
3
Moriond Discussion meeting

• Every year, in each Moriond session, we have a
  discussion meeting in order to find out if we
  still fulfill the "founding" objectives
• As many  institutions , Moriond is getting
  older every year (40th Moriond anniversary this
  year  since 1966), we may become a club of
  "senior or friend physicists".
• Question
• Is MORIOND ALREADY MORIBOND?
• It is why your PARTICIPATION and your HELP is
  much needed to maintain Moriond in the right
  track.

4

• Objectives 
• Promote exchanges and collaboration between
• experimentalists and theorists
• Promote young physicists in giving them a
  priority
• for giving a talk.
• Realization 
• We try in Moriond to have a ratio of 60
• of experimentalists and 40 of theorists.
• This year 70 experimentalists 61 45
  theorists 39
• We try to convince speakers that theoretical
  talks should
• be prepared with experimenters in the audience
  in mind,
• and experimental talks should likewise be aimed
  at theorists.
• DID WE SUCCEED ?

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Reminder EW2006 session
12
(No Transcript)
13
Program Committee

• Present at the meeeting
• E. Augé (L.A.L. Orsay),
• A. Capella (L.P.T.H.E. Orsay),
• Y. Dokshitzer (LPTHE, Paris)
• B. Klima (Fermilab),
• L. McLerran (B..N.L,Brookhaven),
• B. Pietrzyk (LAPP, Annecy)
• Chung-I Tan (Brown University),
• J. Tran Thanh Van (Orsay),

• Cannot attend this year
• E. Berger (A.N.L),
• S. Bethke (MPI, Munchen),
• A. Czarnecki (Edmonton)
• D. Denegri (CERN),
• N. Glover (Durham),
• L. Kluberg (L.P.N.H.E.,Palaiseau),
• M. Krawcsyk (Warsaw Univ.)
• and U. Widerman (CERN)

• Thanks to the chair(wo)men of the various
  sessions of the conference.

14
Conference Secretariat

• Patricia Chemali
• Isabelle Cossin
• Elizabeth Hautefeuille
• Maryvonne Joguet
• Nicole Ribet
• Pierre Pham

15
Sponsors

• European Union
• CNRS   Formation Permanente 
• IN2P3  Institut National de Physique Nucléaire
  et de Physique des Particules
• CEA  DAPNIA-DSM
• FNRS (Belgium)
• NSF (grants for young US physicists)

16
DISCUSSION 

• Scientific Program Etienne Augé Coordinator
• In order to start the discussion, some questions
• - Is the number of talks too high?
• We gave a priority to young scientists to give a
  talk.
• Is the young scientist forum a good formula?
• - Every year, participants asked to have
  introductory talks. This year the organizers have
  made an effort in that direction. What are your
  feelings?
• - Are theoretical talks too specialized and too
  technical? Same question for experimental talks.
• Should we come back to La Thuile?