Setting Rural Tariffs: The Case of Peru - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Setting Rural Tariffs: The Case of Peru

Description:

Low Density Markets: barely sustainable, not very efficient public ownership ... 18. 20. No FOSE. Monthly Reading. No FOSE. Six-Month Reading. With FOSE ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: eduardo99
Category:
Tags: barely | case | peru | rural | setting | tariffs

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Setting Rural Tariffs: The Case of Peru


1
  • Setting Rural Tariffs The Case of Peru Main
    Issues
  • Eduardo Zolezzi
  • World Bank Former Staff and Consultant
  • Former Peru Energy Sector Regulator
  • Washington, March 7, 2006

2
Situation of Electrification in Peru (1)
  • The population of Perú is about 27 million
    inhabitants, of which 65 live in urban areas
    (17.5 millones) and the remaining 35 (9.5
    millones) live in rural areas.
  • The highest poverty indexes correspond to rural
    areas, mainly located in the highlands and the
    amazon.
  • The average annual family income in the rural
    areas is in the range of US 300-1,500.
  • The rural population without electricity is
    approximately 6.5 million corresponding to about
    70 of the total rural population.
  • Access to other type of infrastructure in rural
    areas is also very limited according to the
    2000 National Household Survey, one in eight
    inhabitants of rural areas has access to paved
    road and less than 40 has public pipeline
    potable water service.

3
Situation of Electrification in Peru (2)
4
Situation of Electrification in Peru (3)

5
Electrification Index per Province
6
Per Capita Expenditures and Electricity Access
7
Access Gap to Reach the Poor
8
Main Characteristics of Distribution Systems
  • Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence show
    that electricity distribution cost functions
    exhibit
  • important economies of scale
  • increasing returns with scale and
  • important economies with consumption and
  • clients geographical density.

9
The Cost Problem of Rural Electrification
10
Situation of Electricity Distribution in Peru (1)
  • Very Diverse Structure/Management
  • High Density Market (very) profitable, efficient
    private ownership/management (Edelnor, Luz del
    Sur)
  • Medium Density Markets profitable, efficient
    public ownership/management (e.g. Distriluz,
    Seal, Electrosur Este) minor problems for
    introducing private participation.
  • Low Density Markets barely sustainable, not very
    efficient public ownership/management (some RDC)
  • Disperse and Very Low Density Markets non
    profitable, loosing making, inefficient public
    ownership/management (most of public-owned RDC)
  • MEM Expansion of Electricity Frontier/Rural
    Projects high loosing making projects,
    administered by Adinelsa the major problem of
    electrification.

11
Situation of Electricity Distribution in Peru (2)
  • Operating Margin of Public-Owned Distribution
    Companies
  • (1.00 US S/. 3.3 New Soles)
  • Operating Profits Distriluz Group S/. 32 million
    in 2002, 37.5 in 2003 and 64.7 in 2004
  • Operating Profits Seal, ELSO S/. 11 million in
    2002, 3.8 in 2003 and 2.8 in 2004
  • Operating Profits Other (ELS, ELO, Puno,
    Ucayali) S/. -18.6 million in 2002, 6.3 en 2003
    y 12.2 en 2004
  • Operating Losses Adinelsa S/.3.9 million in
    2002, 9.3 in 2003 and 15.5 in 2004

12
FOSE Impact (1)
  • 62 of all residential clients at national level
    benefit from FOSE
  • Lima consumers are the major contributors to FOSE
  • An average of S/. 2.5 millions each month are
    transferred to distributors that receive FOSE
  • Only regulated consumers pay for FOSE
    representing about 50 of total consumption
  • The newly expanded FOSE has increased this
    subsidy transfers considerably

13
FOSE Impact (2)
FOSE Impact on Average Residential Tariff
Consumption of 30 kWh/Month
20
17,39
18
16,33
16
13,62
14
12,56
12
9,85
Cents of US/kWh
10
8,79
8
6
4
2
0
No FOSE
No FOSE
With FOSE
With FOSE
With FOSE
With FOSE
Monthly Reading
Monthly Reading
Monthly Reading
Six-Month Reading
Six-Month Reading
Six-Month Reading
Law 27510 (2001)
Law 8307 (2005)
14
Electricity Prices in Peru and Other LAC
Countries
OLADE ELECTRICITY PRICE STATISTICS (US/kWh) Dec2003 OLADE ELECTRICITY PRICE STATISTICS (US/kWh) Dec2003 OLADE ELECTRICITY PRICE STATISTICS (US/kWh) Dec2003 OLADE ELECTRICITY PRICE STATISTICS (US/kWh) Dec2003
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
ARGENTINA 4.14 4.44 2.08
BOLIVIA 5.49 8.43 3.98
BRASIL 8.27 7.27 3.84
COLOMBIA 7.70 9.24 7.17
CHILE 8.56 8.21 5.56
ECUADOR 13.03 11.11 9.65
MEXICO 8.09 13.95 6.95
PARAGUAY 5.60 5.97 3.76
PERU 11.37 7.59 7.20
REP. DOMINICANA 9.53 10.60 10.82
SURINAME 17.10 17.30 13.10
URUGUAY 10.55 7.03 3.89
VENEZUELA 5.50 7.90 2.80
Organización Latinoamericana de Energía Organización Latinoamericana de Energía Organización Latinoamericana de Energía Organización Latinoamericana de Energía
15
Main Problems Identified
  • Lack of Predictable and Sustainable Sources of
    Funding
  • Lack of Incentives for Investment in Rural
    Electrification Programs/Projects
  • Inadequate Tariffs for Rural Electrification
    Development
  • Very Low Rural Electricity Consumption and
    Barriers to Densification
  • Deficiencies in Planning, Design, Regulations,
    Management and Implementation of RE Projects
  • Lack of Adequate Legal and Regulatory Framework
    for RE and Electrification of remote, isolated
    communities
  • Limited Participation of Regional and Local
    Governments, and Practically Null Participation
    of Private Sector

16
Existing Legal Frameworks for RE
  • Electricity Concession Law (LCE) No. 25844-1992
    and Regulations (overall sector framework no
    specific reference to electrification of urban
    marginal, rural, remote and isolated comunities,
    and consumers).
  • Rural, Remote, Isolated and Frontier
    Electrification Law No. 27744-2002 (establish a
    financing fund keeps a centralized approach with
    MEM/DEP in charge of planning, designing and
    construction of projects. This law was objected
    by the executive and was not regulated not
    operational)
  • Draft Law for the Promotion of Private Investment
    in Rural Electrification, approved by congress,
    but objected by the executive not enacted (do
    not supercedes Law 27744 it complements some of
    the articles of Law 27744 creating a special
    regime for promoting private investment in RE
    under the general ProInversion concession regime)
  • Law for the Promotion and Use of Renewable Energy
    Resources in Rural, Remote and Isolated Areas,
    No. 28546-2005 (very general and declarative with
    no specific promotion mechanisms it has not yet
    been regulated)
  • Second Draft Law for the Promotion of Private
    Investment in Rural Electrification, approved by
    congress but objected by the executive (some
    improvements to Law 27744 main objection is to
    sources of funding for the RE fund it establishes
    and the tax exceptions to investment subsidy)

17
The Great Challenge of Rural Electrification in
Peru Its Geography
Satellite Digital Terrain Elevation Model
18
Thank You For Your Attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com