Creating a Scientific Abstract - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Creating a Scientific Abstract

Description:

Ex: Effect of Owner Education Level on Number of Cats per Household ... What is the big point that you want to take home? Usually one or two sentences ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: GPTA
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Creating a Scientific Abstract


1
Creating a Scientific Abstract
  • Gail P. Taylor, Ph.D. University of Texas at San
    Antonio
  • Additional References
  • http//www.bio.davidson.edu/Courses/Bio111/Bio111L
    abMan/Preface20B7F.htmlhttp//www.uaf.edu/csem/
    ashsss/abstract_writing.html

2
What is a Scientific Abstract?
  • Summary report of scientific study
  • Several Types
  • Begin papers
  • Used at Conferences
  • Purpose determines format
  • Conference
  • Determines format/style
  • Published in books or CDs
  • Represent you and your mentor
  • Draws people to your work

3
For Conferences
  • Create Abstract
  • Confer with Mentor (your mentor is always right)
  • Receive Approval from RISE program director
    (SACNAS and ABRCMS)
  • Submit
  • Choose Oral Presentation or Poster
  • Conference Responds
  • Accepted or not
  • Oral or Poster
  • Prepare Oral or Poster presentation
  • Attend Conference
  • Make presentation

4
General Abstract Format
  • Project Title
  • Author, affiliations (university/department) and
    Address, perhaps email
  • Introduction Foundation for research Purpose
    of Research (can put overall goal)
  • Hypothesis- What you expect
  • Methods - How studied
  • Results - Principal findings
  • Conclusion and Discussion - Success of hypothesis
    and what findings mean

5
Following the Rules
  • Concise as possible
  • Body length determined
  • 300 Words
  • 2500 Characters
  • Title length may be determined
  • Formatting specified
  • Font used and its size
  • Title capitalization
  • Single spaced

6
Advice in Writing
  • Abstracts are short but time-consuming
  • Very information-dense, but simply formatted
  • Write long and pare down if needed
  • Analyze one sentence at a time
  • Each sentence has purpose
  • Each sentence logically follows another
  • Use plain English wherever you can
  • Use active voice when you can
  • State only your most important conclusion(s)
  • There is not good writing, only good rewriting

7
Following Conventions - Tense in Scientific
Writing
  • Present tense
  • previously published information accepted as fact
  • In Intro and discussion Spatial resolution of
    MR microscopy can reach 3 microns ref.
  • Refer to other parts of your document
  • Figure 4 shows a diffusion-weighted image.
  • Past tense - methods and results/actions
  • What we did, saw, and found
  • Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane.
  • All animals exhibited significantly diminished
    learning capacity...
  • Past perfect - action that happened before other
    past action
  • Group 2 rats had been housed individually prior
    to the beginning of the study
  • Present perfect - action recently completed or
    continuing to the present
  • Since 1991, researchers at the Center for In Vivo
    Microscopy have collaborated with more than
    thirty investigators at other institutions.

Duke University Medical Centerhttp//wwwcivm.mc.d
uke.edu/civmResources/iplHelp/writing.tips/tenses.
html
8
Title
  • Length and text style determined by conference
  • Optimally, identical to paper title
  • Very brief summary of research
  • Omits A study of, Investigations of, etc
  • Put species studied
  • Put limiting information
  • Avoid cute or abbreviations
  • May or may not give results
  • Topic Effects of phenobarbital on learning
  • Conclusive Phenobarbatal diminishes learning
  • Helps people to choose and find article
  • Ex Effect of Owner Education Level on Number of
    Cats per Household
  • Ex FGF-2 Induces Regeneration of the Chick Limb
    Bud

9
Introduction
  • What is the general topic you were investigating
    and why is it important?
  • Provide supporting information for title
  • Generally max 3 sentences
  • General information to specific
  • Ex The theory of competitive exclusion predicts
    that food habits of closely related species
    should not overlap significantly where species
    occur together.

10
Hypothesis
  • What are the specific questions you are
    addressing with this project?
  • Sometimes you need two sentences, but one is
    better
  • Ex We hypothesize that larvae of two recently
    diverged but regionally overlapping butterfly
    species, A and B, will have different food
    preferences.

11
Methods
  • How did you do this experiment?
  • One or two sentences are needed for short
    abstract (175 words). Three for longer.
  • Just to give general idea
  • No vendor info needed
  • Ex. In an overlap zone near Oil City, PA,
    transects in five different habitats were used to
    determine food and habitat preferences in wild
    populations. Two species of captive caterpillars
    were offered native foods in the laboratory
    weight changes of foods and caterpillars were
    determined daily.

12
Results
  • What did you find out?
  • One to two sentences ought to be enough state
    only you main point(s).
  • Include your most important data that influenced
    your conclusion
  • mean values, significance, standard deviations,
    number of samples you studied, etc.)
  • Ex. Food habits in overlapping habitats were
    significantly different between the two species
    (ANOVA p 0.001). Food habits in non-overlapping
    habitats were not significantly different (ANOVA
    p 0.52). There were no differences in food
    preferences (ANOVA p 0.76) or growth rates
    (ANOVA p 0.88) on different foods in laboratory
    maintained populations.

13
Conclusion/Discussion
  • How did hypothesis turn out?
  • What does your work mean?
  • What is the big point that you want to take home?
  • Usually one or two sentences
  • Ex Although both species obtain nourishment from
    the same types of plants, when living in
    overlapping habitats they did not do so and thus
    were able to co-exist. These results support
    provide further support for the theory of
    competitive exclusion.

14
Acknowledgements of Funding
  • At end, place recognition of funding source
  • This work was supported in part by
    NIH/NIGMS/MBRS-RISE GM 60655
  • Supported by MARC-USTAR GM 07717.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com