Project CEOS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Project CEOS

Description:

Women face unconscious bias in competitions for fellowships, journal space, ... Flexible Career Policies. Cultural Assumptions Questioned and Shifted ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: maryj46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Project CEOS


1
Project CEOS Comprehensive Equity at Ohio
State ceos.osu.edu Comprehensive Equity at Ohio
State Leading to Excellence
2
CEOS The Co-PIs
  • Dr. Joan Herbers, PI Prof. of Evolution,
    Ecology, Organismal Biology, College of
    Biological Sciences
  • Dr. Jill Bystydzienski Chair, Department of
    Womens Studies
  • Dr. Anne Carey Assoc. Prof. of Earth Sciences,
    Assoc. Dean in the College of Mathematical
    Physical Sciences
  • Dr. Suzanne Damarin Prof. of Educational Policy
    and Leadership, College of Education Human
    Ecology
  • Dr. Anand Desai Prof., John Glenn School of
    Public Affairs
  • Dr. Anne Massaro Human Resources,
    Organizational Development Consultant
  • Dr. Carolyn Merry Prof. and Chair, Department of
    Civil and Environmental Eng. Geodetic Sciences,
    College of Engineering
  • Dr. Jean Sander Prof. and Associate Dean,
    College of Vet Med

3
Outline
  • Overview of gender equity in Science, Technology,
    Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
  • The situation at Ohio State
  • Demographics
  • Faculty flux diagrams
  • Project CEOS
  • The Transformational Leadership Model
  • Participating units and management structure

4
  • The problem a persistent loss of women from
    scientific fields throughout phases of career
    development.
  • Example Academic Medicine
  • Med School Applicants 50 women
  • Medical Students 48
  • MD graduates 46
  • Residents 42
  • Med School Faculty 33
  • Associate Professors 27
  • Professors 15
  • Chairs 11

5
  • Virginia Valian describes how gender schemas
    impede womens progress
  • Women are underestimated when in leadership
    positions
  • Womens credentials are implicitly devalued
  • Women face unconscious bias in competitions for
    fellowships, journal space, recognition by
    prestigious societies

6
  • Stereotype threat can impair girls and womens
    performance in STEM

7
  • Stereotype threat can impair girls and womens
    performance

8
  • Stereotype threat can impair girls and womens
    performance

9
  • why students switch from STEM majors

Men Women
1. Loss of interest in STEM 1. Other majors offer better education
2.Curriculum Overload 2. Loss of interest in STEM
3. Poor teaching in STEM 3. Rejection of STEM lifestyle
4. Career path too hard 4. Poor teaching in STEM
5. Other majors offer better education 5. Poor advising
10
  • Women and men STEM faculty have very different
    family situations

Men Women
Married with children 70 44
Married without children 15 19
Single without children 11 26
Single with children 4 19
11
  • Married STEM faculty have very different home
    situations

Men Women
Spouse works full-time 45 89
Spouse works part-time 20 5
Spouse not employed 35 6
Spouse is also a scientist 48 78
12
ADVANCE Part of a National Conversation
  • The National Academies published Beyond Bias and
    Barriers in 2007 to identify the issues and to
    outline remedies for universities and
  • professional societies.
  • The Hidden Brain Drain Project published the
    Athena Factor in 2008 concerning womens careers
    in STEM industries with recommendations about
    retention.

13
NSF ADVANCE Program
  • Institutional Transformation (IT) Grant
  • Overall goal Increase participation of women in
    the scientific and engineering workforce
  • through increased representation and advancement
    of women in academic science, technology,
    engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers
  • through research-based interventions that affect
    the workplace environment
  • OSUs grant 3.6 million, 5-year duration
    starting 9/2008
  • there are currently 35 ADVANCE IT institutions 5
    in the Big Ten, 3 in Ohio
  • 6 have already graduated

14
CEOS The Participating Colleges
  • Biological Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Mathematical Physical Sciences
  • Veterinary Medicine

15
1998 Faculty Demographic Snapshot
580
75
For Colleges of Bio Sci, ENG, MAPS, and Vet Med
16
Faculty Flux Diagram for Men
For Colleges of Bio Sci, ENG, MAPS, and Vet Med
17
Faculty Flux Diagram for Men
321
181
78
18
Faculty Flux Diagram for Men
580
579
351
321
181
156
72
78
19
Faculty Flux Diagram for Women
75
20
30
25
For Colleges of Bio Sci, ENG, MAPS, and Vet Med
20
Faculty Flux Diagram for Women
93
75
30
20
30
30
25
33
For Colleges of Bio Sci, ENG, MAPS, and Vet Med
21
Salient Points from Faculty Flux Diagrams
  • We have more women now on our faculties than in
    1998 while the number of men have remained
    constant.
  • Of the 103 assistant professors in 1998, 69 of
    the men and 44 of the women were still on the
    faculty 7 years later only 3 were denied tenure.
  • Of the 1998 associate professors, 42 of the men
    and 60 of the women were still in rank 7 years
    later.
  • Since 1998, women constituted 38 of the
    assistant professor hires, 16 of the associate
    professor hires and 11 of the professor hires.
  • Of those hired since 1998, 95 of the men and 87
    of the women are still on the faculty.
  • During the past year, our Colleges lost 4 women.

22
Leadership Changes over Five Years
College Deans Deans Assoc Asst Deans Assoc Asst Deans Chairs Chairs
2002 2007 2002 2007 2002 2007
CBS 0/1 1/1 1/2 2/3 0/6 2/6
MAPS 0/1 0/1 0/2 1/3 0/6 0/6
ENG 0/1 0/1 2/4 2/5 0/12 3/12
VET 0/1 0/1 0/3 1/3 0/3 0/3
Total 0/4 1/4 3/11 6/14 0/27 5/27
Entries indicate the no. of women/total no. in
those positions One male is African American
23
Representation of Women Faculty in Autumn 2007
College Asst Prof Assoc Prof Prof Total N of Faculty
CBS 39.1 23.7 17.1 25.5 102
MAPS 37.8 14.8 6.3 13.3 225
ENG 26.8 19.3 5.4 12.8 272
VET 44.4 33.3 20.0 27.1 70
All OSU 40.8 34.6 18.2 30.6 3477
24
CEOS Leadership and Management Structure - 1
  • Dr. Mary Juhas CEOS Program Director (0.5 FTE),
    Senior Asst. Dean, College of Engineering (0.5
    FTE), Research Scientist in the Dept. of
    Materials Science Eng. (0 FTE)
  • Dr. Joan Herbers CEOS Principal Investigator
  • Ms. Jill Hartman Program Assistant (1 FTE)
  • CEOS College Council
  • Dr. John Hubbell (Vet Med)
  • Dr. Matt Platz (BMPS)
  • Dr. Greg Washington (ENG)

25
CEOS Leadership and Management Structure - 2
  • CEOS Advisory Council
  • Deb Ballam Director of The Womens Place
  • Glenda La Rue Director, Women in Engineering
    Program (ENG)
  • Jean Schelhorn Associate Vice President,
    Technology Licensing
  • Michael Camp Director of the Center for
    Entrepreneurship
  • Georgina Dodge Office of Minority Affairs
  • Brenda Brueggemann Program Coordinator,
    Disability Studies Program
  • Mary Juhas, ex officio
  • Research team data collection, analysis,
    assessment, and evaluation
  • Jill Bystydzienski
  • Suzanne Damarin
  • Anand Desai
  • Anne Massaro
  • Joan Herbers, ex officio

26
CEOS Leadership and Management Structure - 3
  • External Advisory Board
  • Dr. Joseph Alutto, Provost and Executive Vice
    President (chair)
  • Dr. Sharon Bird Assoc. Prof. of Sociology, Iowa
    State, co-PI on ISUs ADVANCE project
  • Dr. Carolyn Mahoney President of Lincoln
    University, Missouri
  • Dr. Farah Majidzadeh CEO of Resource
    International, an engineering consulting firm in
    Columbus
  • Dr. Sue Rosser Dean of the Ivan Allen College of
    Liberal Arts, Georgia Tech, Prof. of Public
    Policy and of History, Technology, and Society,
    PI on Georgia Techs ADVANCE project

27
ADVANCE Expected Benefits
  • Improve recruitment and retention of women
    minority faculty
  • Improve diversity of faculty students
  • Establish a pool of senior women available for
    leadership positions

28
Transformational Leadership Model
29
The Four Programs within Project CEOS
  • Leadership training for deans and department
    chairs
  • Action learning teams that include deans, chairs,
    faculty and staff in the participating Colleges
    and beyond
  • Peer mentoring for tenured women in the STEM
    Colleges
  • Entrepreneurship training for women faculty in
    the STEM Colleges
  • Each program will include structured activities,
    peer networking, and reflective practice.

30
Services for Women Faculty
  • Peer mentoring circles to start June 2009
  • Entrepreneurship training to start autumn 2009
  • Maintain faculty profiles on OSU PRO
  • Podcasts of your lab for promotion of your work
  • Electronic reference library on women in STEM
  • What else can CEOS do for YOU?

ceos.osu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com